ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07680452MelafitUpdated Jul 29, 2026

Clinical Study on High-fiber Diet and Short-term Fasting in Melanoma Under Immunotherapy With Checkpoint Inhibition

An interventional study of High-Fiber Diet and High-Fiber Diet and Short-Term Fasting in Melanoma (Skin Cancer), sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The treatment of melanoma has improved significantly in recent years. A modern form of cancer treatment known as immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors plays a key role in this. These drugs help the immune system better recognize and fight cancer cells. Nevertheless, it remains a challenge to maximize treatment effectiveness while minimizing side effects.

One possible approach to influencing treatment efficacy and tolerability is diet. A high-fiber diet, as recommended by the German Nutrition Society, increases the effectiveness of immunotherapy, in part through its influence on gut bacteria (the gut microbiota). Initial studies also show that short-term fasting (i.e., eating nothing or very little for a limited period) reduces the side effects of immunotherapy in mouse models and improves the tolerability of chemotherapy in humans.

This study investigates the feasability of a study on short-term fasting, in addition to a high-fiber diet in patiens with melanoma undergoing immunotherapy.

40 participants will follow a high-fiber diet based on the recommendations of the German Nutrition Society. Additionally, half of the participants will undergo periodic cycles of short-term fasting of 72h with each immunotherapy. Another 20 participants will not undergo any intervention and serve as a control group.

The goal is to determine whether this study concept is feasible. Exploratory outcomes include, quality of life, fatigue, tolerability of the therapy, impact on disease progression, immune system (flow cytometry) and gut bacteria (microbiome).

The results are intended to help understand whether targeted dietary measures can support the effectiveness of modern cancer treatments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Melanoma (Skin Cancer)

Keywords

  • fasting
  • diet
  • fiber
  • high-fiber
  • melanoma
  • STF
  • short-term fasting
  • microbiome
  • checkpoint-inhibitor
  • checkpoint-inhibition
  • immunotherapy
03

In context

Melanoma

3,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 578 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 40 across 2,649 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Charite University, Berlin, Germany is the lead sponsor of 857 studies on the registry; 129 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • or cytologically confirmed stage IIB-IIIC melanoma
  • Indication for immune checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy as determined by the tumor board
  • No prior systemic melanoma therapy
  • 0 or 1
  • ≥ 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Underweight ( ≤19.5)
  • Pre-existing eating disorder
  • Severe internal medical conditions (e.g., renal insufficiency with creatinine > 2 mg/dL) or secondary
  • Current vegan diet or prolonged fasting (≤ 4 days) within the last 6 months
  • Use of antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to the start of the study intervention
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    High-Fiber Diet

    Behavioral: High-Fiber Diet

  • Experimental
    High-Fiber Diet and Short-Term Fasting

    Behavioral: High-Fiber Diet and Short-Term Fasting

  • No intervention
    Observational

Interventions

  • BehavioralHigh-Fiber Diet

    High-Fiber Diet (\>35g/day) according to the German Nutrition Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung, DGE) for 6 months.

  • BehavioralHigh-Fiber Diet and Short-Term Fasting

    High-Fiber Diet (\>35g/day) according to the German Nutrition Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung, DGE) and 72 hours of short-term fasting (max 400kcal/day) with every immunetherapy cycle for 6 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Study feasability, measured by adequacy and efficiency of recruitment strategies

    Number of participants recruited per month (at least 2 per month)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  2. Study feasability, measured by adherence to the intervention and dropout rate

    Adherence to the Intervention for intervention groups (at least 70% of the fasting cycles)

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  3. Study feasability, measured by acceptability of study outcome measures

    Patient acceptability of study assessments (number of completed study visits)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  4. Feasibility of the study procedures

    Feasibility of study procedures, e.g. in terms of patient and provider acceptance of randomisation and outcome measures (percentage of eligible participants who explicitly refuse to participate because of the randomization process, missing item-level data, completion rates of questionnaires)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  5. Feasibility of the intervention procedures

    Feasibility of the intervention methods (including patient acceptance of video and telephone consultations measured by no-show rate, patient safety in terms of number of adverse events)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events during the study

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  2. Hospitalizations rate

    Number of hospital admissions occurring during the study period

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  3. Dose Interruption or reduction

    Frequency of dose interruption or reduction

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  4. Cumulative dose

    Total cumulative dose of study treatment administered during the study period

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  5. Treatment discontinuation

    Frequency of treatment discontinuation and the reasons for it

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  6. Subjective Severity of the main symptom

    Patient-reported severity of the main symptom assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst imaginable symptom severity)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  7. Distress Thermometer

    Psychological distress assessed using the Distress Thermometer, a self-report scale ranging from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). The DT is accompanied by a Problem list that identifies practical, family, emotional, spiritual/religious, and physical concerns

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  8. Health status (EQ-5D-5L)

    Health status assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. It evaluates five dimensions (mobilty, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each rated at five levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems).

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  9. Short Form 36

    Change in health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). The instrument evaluates eight domains of physical and mental health, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (scale 0-100).

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  10. Quality of life of cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Quality of life of cancer patients assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The instrument comprises 30 items evaluating global health status/quality of life, functional domains (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), and symptom domains. Higher scores on functional and global health status scales indicate better functioning and quality of life, whereas higher symptom scores indicate greater symptom burden.

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  11. Nutrition

    Dietary intake assessed using a 3-day food diary and using a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). The questionnaire evaluates the usual frequency of consumption of a range of food and beverage items over the specified recall period. Data are used to characterize dietary patterns and estimate intake of major food groups and nutrients.

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  12. Differential blood count

    Analysis of differential blood count to determine the distribution of leukocyte subtypes, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils." Unit of Measure: cells/µL

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  13. C-reactive protein (CRP)

    CRP (C-reactive protein) as a marker of inflammatory conditions is used to assess acute inflammation and monitor the effects of prolonged fasting and plant-based nutrition. Higher scores indicate more inflammation. Serum CRP, unit of Measure: CRP in milligram per liter (mg/L)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  14. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT/ALAT)

    Alanine aminotransferase (ALT/ALAT), Unit of Measure: U/L

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  15. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST/ASAT)

    Aspartate aminotransferase (AST/ASAT), unit of Measure: U/L

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  16. Electrolytes

    calcium in millimol per liter (mmol/L), potassium (mmol/L), sodium (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  17. Creatinine

    Creatinine in µmol per liter (µmol/L), Biomarker of renal function and muscle metabolism

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  18. Glucose

    Glucose, unit of Measure: mg/dL oder mmol/L

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  19. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)

    Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), unit of Measure: U/L

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  20. S100 protein

    S100 protein, unit of Measure: µg/L or ng/mL

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

Other outcomes

  1. Waist circumference

    Waist circumference, unit of Measure: cm

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  2. Hip circumference

    Hip circumference, unit of Measure: cm

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  3. Bioimpedance measurement

    Body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  4. Psoas muscle density

    Psoas muscle density assessed from clinically indicated CT scans when available from standard clinical care

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  5. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Time from study entry to disease progression or death

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  6. Recurrence-free survival (RFS)

    Time from study entry to disease recurrence or death

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  7. Overall survival (OS)

    Time from study entry to death from any cause

    Time frame: After 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  8. Flow cytometry

    Immune cell subsets quantified by flow cytometry

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  9. Ketone bodies

    Ketone body concentration, Indicators of fat metabolism and ketosis, analyzed for metabolic adaptations. Unit of Measure: mmol/L

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  10. Cytokine profile

    Quantification of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, IL-10) using multiplex ELISA or Luminex technology.

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  11. Immune cell proliferation and Stimulated cytokine production

    Functional immune cell tests: Proliferation assays and cytokine production following stimulation

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

  12. Gut microbiota diversity

    Gut microbiota diversity assessed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples.

    Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks, after 3 months, after 6 months, optional follow-ups at 12 and 18 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will be shared upon request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 23 months after the start.

Of 219 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Melanoma, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 227 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 62.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 3, 2026
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
StartActual
Jul 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 5, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 5, 2028
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07680452
Collaborators
University Hospital Heidelberg, CHUM Microbiome Research Center Montréal
Responsible party
Anika Hartmann Rajput, MD/PhD (MD/PhD, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Clinician Scientist, Charite University, Berlin, Germany) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
Start date
Jul 28, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 5, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Anika Rajput, MD/PhD
Contact
melafit@charite.de
004930450618599
Thomas Eigentler, Prof. Dr.
Contact
Anika Rajput, MD/PhD
principal investigator · Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion