CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07680296ADisIRastUpdated Jul 2, 2026

NIR Device for Assessment of Skin Flap Perfusion in Breast Surgery: A Pilot Interventional Study

An interventional study of Snapshot NIR V3.0 in Breast Cancer, Breast Reconstruction and Mastectomy, sponsored by National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this single-center, nonrandomized, interventional non-profit pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of a non-invasive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) imaging device for assessing skin-flap tissue oxygen saturation in adult women undergoing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction after oncological surgery.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can NIRS imaging provide reproducible measurements of tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂) in mastectomy skin flaps before surgery, during the intraoperative phase, and during postoperative follow-up?
  • Can spatial and temporal variations in StO₂ identify areas of potentially reduced flap perfusion or impaired tissue viability?
  • Can NIRS-derived oxygenation measurements support the assessment of postoperative flap healing and ischemic complications?

Participants will:

  • undergo non-invasive NIRS imaging of the breast skin flap before surgery;
  • undergo one intraoperative NIRS acquisition during mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction;
  • undergo repeated NIRS imaging during postoperative follow-up visits;
  • receive standard surgical treatment and postoperative care according to routine clinical practice.

NIRS imaging is performed for study purposes and does not influence intraoperative surgical decision-making or the choice of reconstructive procedure.

Read the detailed description

The ADISIRAST study is a single-center, non-randomized, pre-market, non-profit clinical investigation of a non-invasive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) imaging device for the assessment of perfusion in mastectomy skin flaps in patients undergoing breast surgery with immediate reconstruction.

Mastectomy skin-flap viability is an important determinant of postoperative healing and reconstructive outcomes. In routine clinical practice, flap perfusion is mainly assessed through intraoperative inspection and surgical judgment. Objective methods for evaluating tissue oxygenation may provide complementary information and may help characterize regional perfusion patterns that are not readily apparent during standard clinical assessment.

Near-infrared spectroscopy is a non-invasive optical technique that estimates superficial tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂) by analyzing the relative absorption of near-infrared light by oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. The investigational device is a portable, non-contact NIRS imaging system that generates two-dimensional maps of superficial tissue oxygen saturation. The device does not require tissue contact, contrast-agent injection, or exposure to ionizing radiation. Acquisitions are performed by positioning the device at a standardized distance from the surgical area and obtaining a digital image together with the corresponding StO₂ map.

The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, repeatability, and clinical interpretability of NIRS-derived StO₂ measurements in breast skin flaps throughout the perioperative period. NIRS images were acquired at predefined study time points, including a preoperative baseline assessment, an intraoperative assessment, and postoperative follow-up assessments(1 day and 15 days postoperative). This approach allowed the characterization of temporal changes in tissue oxygenation and the evaluation of regional differences within the skin flap.

Image analysis included assessment of absolute StO₂ values, regional oxygenation differences, spatial distribution of tissue areas within predefined StO₂ ranges, and longitudinal changes in oxygenation patterns. Regions of interest were defined within superior and inferior portions of the breast skin flap to explore regional perfusion heterogeneity. Additional image-derived metrics were calculated to quantify the extent of tissue area within selected StO₂ ranges and the degree of spatial heterogeneity of oxygenation.

Clinical and surgical data were prospectively collected, including reconstructive information, perioperative characteristics, postoperative flap healing, and clinically observed complications. NIRS findings were subsequently evaluated in relation to postoperative clinical observations, particularly the presence, location, and evolution of areas showing impaired healing or suspected ischemic changes.

Surgical planning and intraoperative decisions, including the choice of reconstructive approach, were made according to standard clinical practice, based on the treating surgical team's clinical assessment and preoperative evaluation. The operating surgeon was blinded to the intraoperative NIRS images, and NIRS findings did not influence surgical decision-making or the selection of the reconstructive procedure.

After study completion, NIRS-derived perfusion findings were retrospectively compared with the reconstructive strategy selected during surgery. This exploratory analysis was performed to assess the concordance between NIRS-based indications of flap perfusion and the clinical decision made by the surgical team. The analysis was intended to explore the potential future role of non-invasive tissue oxygenation imaging as an adjunctive tool for perioperative assessment and surgical training, rather than to evaluate a device-guided management strategy.

The study does not compare alternative surgical treatments or reconstructive techniques. It is designed as a feasibility and performance investigation and is not powered to establish definitive diagnostic thresholds, predict clinical outcomes with definitive accuracy, or demonstrate superiority of one reconstructive strategy over another. Data were collected prospectively and managed using coded participant identifiers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Breast Reconstruction
  • Mastectomy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
  • Tissue Oxygenation
  • Skin Flap Perfusion
  • Breast Reconstruction
  • Mastectomy
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex, aged 18 to 90 years.
  • Breast cancer patients scheduled for mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander; or healthy BRCA mutation carriers scheduled for prophylactic mastectomy.
  • No previous radiotherapy to the chest wall.
  • No previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe psychiatric disorders.
  • Advanced malignancy.
  • Severe aortic stenosis.
  • Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • Severe chronic kidney disease.
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  • Advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease (Leriche-Fontaine class III).
  • Use of benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, typical or atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, or anticonvulsants without a stable dose for at least 4 months.
  • Alcohol, caffeine, or other substance abuse.
  • Inability to reasonably adhere to study procedures.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical trial.
  • Withdrawal of informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Snapshot NIR Assessment

    Each patient enrolled in the study will undergo the standard diagnostic and treatment process. The only difference compared to patients not enrolled in the study will be the use of the experimental Snapshot NIR V3.0 device during the routine visits scheduled in any case, and in particular: during the preoperative consultation between the plastic surgeon and the breast surgeon, which must take place within 30 days prior to surgery; during the pre- and post-operative phases; on the first post-operative day during hospitalization; and on the 15th (+/-5 days) post-operative day during one of the routinely scheduled dressing changes.

    Device: Snapshot NIR V3.0

Interventions

  • DeviceSnapshot NIR V3.0

    The Snapshot NIR V3.0 device is used to noninvasively assess superficial breast skin flap tissue oxygenation and perfusion. NIR images and tissue oxygen saturation measurements are acquired preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at a later postoperative assessment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tissue Oxygen Saturation (StO₂) Measured by the Snapshot NIR V3.0 Device

    Superficial tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂, %) measured using the Snapshot NIR V3.0 imaging device. StO₂ values (%) will be obtained from predefined Regions of Interest (ROIs) identified on exported two-dimensional tissue oxygenation maps. Mean StO₂ (%) and the presence of hypoperfused areas will be evaluated at each scheduled study visit.

    Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 15 (±5 days).

  2. Correlation Between Snapshot NIR Tissue Oxygen Saturation (StO₂) and Clinical Assessment of Breast Skin Flap Perfusion

    Correlation between superficial tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂, %) measured using the Snapshot NIR V3.0 device and the clinical assessment of breast skin flap perfusion performed by visual inspection. Clinical assessment findings and StO₂ measurements will be compared for the predefined Regions of Interest (ROIs). The outcome will be expressed as a correlation coefficient between StO₂ (%) measurements and the corresponding clinical assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 15 (±5 days).

  3. Temporal Change in Tissue Oxygen Saturation (StO₂) of Breast Skin Flaps

    Change in superficial tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂, %) measured using the Snapshot NIR V3.0 device over time. Serial StO₂ measurements obtained from predefined Regions of Interest (ROIs) will be compared across study visits to evaluate the temporal evolution of tissue perfusion and hypoperfused areas.

    Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 15 (±5 days).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation Between Snapshot NIR Tissue Oxygen Saturation (StO₂) and Intraoperative Reconstructive Strategy

    Correlation between tissue oxygen saturation (StO₂, %) measured using the Snapshot NIR V3.0 device and the intraoperative reconstructive strategy selected by the surgeon (prepectoral implant versus subpectoral tissue expander). The outcome will be expressed as the correlation between StO₂ (%) measurements and the selected reconstructive strategy.

    Time frame: Intraoperative.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • U.O. Senologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana (AOUP) Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Chiara
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Trivella MG, Piersigilli A, Bernini F, Pelosi G, Burchielli S, Puzzuoli S, Kusmic C, L'Abbate A. Percutaneous cardiac support during myocardial infarction drastically reduces mortality: perspectives from a swine model. Int J Artif Organs. 2017 Jul 5;40(7):338-344. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000604. Epub 2017 Jun 6. PubMed 28604999 ↗
  • Jalil B, Hartwig V, Moroni D, Salvetti O, Benassi A, Jalil Z, Pistoia L, Minutoli Tegrimi T, Quinones-Galvan A, Iervasi G, L'Abbate A, Guiducci L. A Pilot Study of Infrared Thermography Based Assessment of Local Skin Temperature Response in Overweight and Lean Women during Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 19;8(2):260. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020260. PubMed 30791407 ↗
  • Hartwig V, Guiducci L, Marinelli M, Pistoia L, Tegrimi TM, Iervasi G, Quinones-Galvan A, L'Abbate A. Multimodal Imaging for the Detection of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation in Women: A Pilot Study Using NIRS and Infrared Thermography. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:5986452. doi: 10.1155/2017/5986452. Epub 2017 Sep 14. PubMed 29104746 ↗
  • Jalil B, Salvetti O, Poti L, Hartwig V, Marinelli M, L'Abbate A. Near infrared image processing to quantitate and visualize oxygen saturation during vascular occlusion. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Apr;126:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 17. PubMed 26725781 ↗
  • Jalil B, Hartwig V, Salvetti O, Poti L, Gargani L, Barskova T, Matucci Cerinic M, L'Abbate A. Assessment of hand superficial oxygenation during ischemia/reperfusion in healthy subjects versus systemic sclerosis patients by 2D near infrared spectroscopic imaging. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Mar;155:101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 12. PubMed 29512489 ↗
  • Gargani L, Bruni C, Barskova T, Hartwig V, Marinelli M, Trivella MG, Matucci-Cerinic M, L'Abbate A. Near-infrared spectroscopic imaging of the whole hand: A new tool to assess tissue perfusion and peripheral microcirculation in scleroderma. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr;48(5):867-873. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 11. PubMed 30205980 ↗
  • Longobardi P, Hartwig V, Santarella L, Hoxha K, Campos J, Laurino M, Salvo P, Trivella MG, Coceani F, Rocco M, L'Abbate A. Potential markers of healing from near infrared spectroscopy imaging of venous leg ulcer. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional with hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Nov;28(6):856-866. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12853. Epub 2020 Aug 24. PubMed 32789935 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared because participants consented only to aggregated data publication and due to confidentiality and privacy constraints.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07680296
Lead sponsor
National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy
Responsible party
Valentina Hartwig (Research Scientist, National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2026
Start date
Oct 10, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 13, 2026
Completion
Feb 13, 2026
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Matteo Ghilli, MD
principal investigator · U.O. Senologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana (AOUP)
Valentina Hartwig, PhD
study chair · National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy
Maria Giovanna Trivella, MD
study director · National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion