ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07678385LIDO-APPUpdated Jul 1, 2026

Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine for Pain After Laparoscopic Appendectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lidocaine (drug) and Normal Saline Placebo Infusion in Post Operative Pain, Acute and Laparoscopic Appendectomy, sponsored by Hospital Universitario de Caracas. Completed at 1 site in Venezuela. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario de Caracas · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2024, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated whether intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion improves postoperative analgesia and recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. The primary objective was to assess postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to bowel function recovery, length of hospital stay, plasma lidocaine concentrations, and adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain following laparoscopic appendectomy remains an important clinical concern despite advances in multimodal analgesia. Intravenous lidocaine has been proposed as an effective adjunct because of its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antihyperalgesic properties, but evidence in laparoscopic appendectomy remains limited.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial compared continuous intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion with placebo in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy under standardized general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either lidocaine or placebo according to the study protocol.

The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included opioid requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, incidence of adverse events, and perioperative plasma lidocaine concentrations measured at predefined intraoperative and postoperative time points.

The study aimed to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine infusion as part of multimodal perioperative analgesia for laparoscopic appendectomy and to correlate analgesic effects with measured plasma lidocaine concentrations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Pain, Acute
  • Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MULTI-MODAL ANALGESIA
  • LIDOCAINE INFUSION
  • POST-OPERATIVE PAIN
  • OPIOID SPARING
  • DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLED TRIAL
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario de Caracas is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 45 years.
  • I or II.
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy under general anesthesia.
  • Able to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cardiac conduction disorders or documented arrhythmias.
  • Hepatic insufficiency.
  • Renal insufficiency.
  • Chronic or long-term opioid therapy.
  • Known or suspected to amide-type local anesthetics.
  • Hemodynamic instability at the time of admission to the operating room.
  • greater than 35 kg/m².
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intravenous lidocaine group

    Participants received intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion in addition to standardized general anesthesia according to the study protocol.

    Drug: Lidocaine (drug)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    Participants received an equivalent volume of normal saline placebo under identical anesthetic conditions.

    Drug: Normal Saline Placebo Infusion

Interventions

  • Intravenous lidocaine administered as a bolus followed by continuous infusion during laparoscopic appendectomy according to the study protocol.

  • DrugNormal Saline Placebo Infusion

    Intravenous isotonic saline administered using the same infusion schedule as the active treatment to maintain blinding.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate better analgesic efficacy.

    Time frame: At 0 (PACU admission), 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total opioid comsumption

    Total postoperative opioid requirement during the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: From surgery completion through 24 hours after surgery.

  2. Post operative nausea and vomiting

    Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting requiring treatment

    Time frame: From surgery completion through 24 hours after surgery.

  3. Time to return of bowel function

    Time from surgery completion to first flatus or bowel movement.

    Time frame: From surgery completion to first flatus or bowel movement, assessed through 24 hours after surgery.

  4. Lengh of hospital stay

    Time from surgery completion until hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From surgery completion until hospital discharge (anticipated within 72 hours after surgery).

  5. Plasma lidocaine concentration

    Plasma lidocaine concentrations measured at predefined intraoperative and postoperative time points to evaluate systemic exposure and pharmacokinetic profile.

    Time frame: From baseline through 1 hour after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), with plasma lidocaine concentrations assessed at baseline, 30 minutes after study drug infusion initiation, 90 minutes after study drug infusion initiation, and 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitario de Caracas
    Caracas, Miranda 1040, Venezuela
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared. De-identified data may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request and subject to institutional and ethical approval.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2024 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 11 months.

Of 531 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 32. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 541 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2026
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07678385
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario de Caracas
Responsible party
Joseph Alejandro Veraza Almeida (Principal Investigator, Hospital Universitario de Caracas) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2025
Completion
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

JOSEPH A VERAZA, MD
principal investigator · sociedad medica joseph veraza

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion