An interventional study of Experimental : Combined Strength and Balance Training and Control : Balance and Core Training in Functional Ankle Instability, Kinesiophobia and Sports Rehabilitation, sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-26.
Sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This randomized controlled trial investigates the comparative effect of combined strength and balance training versus balance and core training on kinesiophobia (fear of movement), ankle instability, functional outcomes, and athletic performance in adolescent table tennis players with functional ankle instability (FAI). Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups over a 6-week intervention (3 sessions/week). The Experimental Group will receive combined strength and balance training, while the Control Group will receive balance and core training. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools: TSK-17, CAIT, FAAM, Y-Balance Test, Single-Leg Hop Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test.
285 studies on the registry are indexed under Kinesiophobia; 91 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 51 is close to the median of 52 across 174 interventional studies indexed under Kinesiophobia.
Browse Kinesiophobia studies →Ibadat International University, Islamabad is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will receive a 6-week combined strength and balance training program (3 sessions/week, 40-45 min). Strength Component: Theraband Dorsiflexion (3×12), Theraband Eversion (3×12), Heel Raises progressing to single-leg (3×12), Forward Lunges (3×10 each leg). Balance Component: Single-Leg Stance Eyes Open→Closed (3×30 sec), Wobble Board Standing (3×30 sec), Y-Balance Reach (3 trials each direction). Weekly progression: Week 1-2 basic stable surface exercises, Week 3-4 increased repetitions, Week 5-6 single-leg variations introduced.
Other: Experimental : Combined Strength and Balance Training
Participants will receive a 6-week balance and core training program (3 sessions/week, 40-45 min). Balance Component: Single-Leg Stance Firm→Foam (3×30 sec), Tandem Walking (3×10 m), Y-Balance Drill (3 trials each direction). Core Component: Plank Hold (3×20 sec), Side Plank each side (3×15 sec), Dead Bug Exercise (3×10 reps). Weekly progression: Week 1-2 basic level, Week 3-4 increased repetitions, Week 5-6 maintained progression.
Other: Control : Balance and Core Training
A structured 6-week exercise program combining ankle strengthening exercises (Theraband resistance training, heel raises, lunges) with dynamic balance training (single-leg stance, wobble board, Y-balance drills). Sessions last 40-45 minutes and are conducted 3 times per week. Warm-up: 5-7 min light jogging/dynamic mobility. Main Training: 30 min combined strength and balance work. Cool-down: 5 min static stretching.
A structured 6-week program combining balance training (single-leg stance on firm and foam surfaces, tandem walking, Y-balance drills) with core stabilization exercises (plank, side plank, dead bug). Sessions last 40-45 minutes, 3 times per week with the same warm-up and cool-down structure as the experimental group
Kinesiophobia - Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17)
17-item self-report questionnaire measuring fear of movement and re-injury. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.72-0.90). Reduced scores indicate decreased kinesiophobia.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
Ankle Instability - Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
Validated questionnaire assessing functional ankle instability severity. Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83). Increased post-intervention scores indicate improved perceived ankle stability
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
Functional Ability - Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Self-reported tool assessing functional limitations in foot and ankle disorders. Excellent internal consistency (α = 0.89-0.98) and reliability (ICC = 0.84-0.92) for ADL and Sports subscales. Increased scores indicate improved functional ability
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
Dynamic Balance - Y Balance Test (YBT)
Measures dynamic balance and lower limb neuromuscular control. Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.85-0.91). Reach distances normalized to limb length. Increased post-intervention reach distance indicates improved ankle stability.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
Functional Performance - Single-Leg Hop Test
Reliable measure of lower limb strength, dynamic stability, and functional performance (ICC = 0.85-0.95). Increased hop distance and improved landing control indicate enhanced neuromuscular function.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
Agility and Performance - T-Test and Illinois Agility Test
Valid and reliable measures of agility and change-of-direction speed. T-Test (ICC = 0.90-0.98), Illinois Agility Test (ICC = 0.88-0.96). Reduced completion time indicates improved dynamic stability and neuromuscular control.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ibadat International University, Islamabad