ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07667855Updated Jun 25, 2026

Peri-implant Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Microneedling With i-PRF vs. Connective Tissue Graft

An interventional study of Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) and Microneedling with Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (MN+i-PRF) in Thin Peri-implant Mucosal Phenotype, sponsored by Beirut Arab University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Lebanon. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by Beirut Arab University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate a minimally invasive technique for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation using microneedling combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) compared with the current gold-standard connective tissue graft (CTG). Patients with thin peri-implant soft tissue requiring implant second-stage surgery in the esthetic zone will be randomly assigned to receive either CTG harvested from the palate or a series of microneedling and i-PRF treatments. Clinical outcomes including mucosal thickness, keratinized tissue width, peri-implant health parameters, volumetric soft tissue changes, esthetic outcomes, and patient-reported measures of pain and satisfaction will be evaluated during follow-up. The study aims to determine whether microneedling with i-PRF can provide comparable soft tissue augmentation while reducing patient morbidity associated with connective tissue graft harvesting.

Read the detailed description

Peri-implant soft tissue quality is a key determinant of implant health, long-term stability, and esthetic outcomes. Adequate peri-implant mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width contribute to the maintenance of peri-implant health, while thin soft tissue phenotypes have been associated with increased risk of recession, discomfort during oral hygiene procedures, and peri-implant tissue complications. Connective tissue grafting (CTG) remains the gold standard for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation; however, it requires harvesting autogenous tissue from a secondary donor site, resulting in increased surgical morbidity, postoperative discomfort, and longer treatment time.

Recent regenerative approaches have focused on the use of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF), an autologous blood-derived concentrate rich in platelets, leukocytes, fibrin, and growth factors that promote angiogenesis, collagen formation, and soft tissue healing. Microneedling is a minimally invasive technique that creates controlled micro-injuries within the soft tissues, stimulating collagen production and enhancing the penetration and biological effects of regenerative agents. Preliminary evidence suggests that combining microneedling with i-PRF may enhance peri-implant soft tissue thickness and quality while minimizing patient morbidity.

This study is designed as a prospective, parallel-arm randomized controlled clinical trial comparing microneedling combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (MN+i-PRF) with connective tissue grafting (CTG) for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation during implant second-stage surgery. Approximately 24 eligible participants presenting with thin peri-implant soft tissue phenotype in the esthetic zone will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the test or control group. Allocation concealment will be performed using computer-generated randomization and sealed opaque envelopes. Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Participants in the control group will undergo peri-implant soft tissue augmentation using a subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palate and stabilized at the buccal aspect of the implant site. Participants in the test group will receive microneedling using a sterile automated microneedling device followed by injection of autologous i-PRF into the peri-implant mucosa. The test intervention will be performed at implant uncovery and repeated at 2-week and 4-week follow-up visits to maximize regenerative effects.

The primary outcome measure will be the change in peri-implant mucosal thickness from baseline. Secondary outcome measures will include keratinized tissue width, peri-implant probing depth, bleeding on probing, volumetric soft tissue contour changes assessed through intraoral scanning, Pink Esthetic Score (PES), and patient-reported outcome measures including postoperative pain and treatment satisfaction. Clinical and patient-centered outcomes will be evaluated at predefined follow-up intervals extending up to 9 months after treatment.

The objective of this study is to determine whether microneedling combined with i-PRF can provide peri-implant soft tissue augmentation outcomes comparable to connective tissue grafting while reducing treatment invasiveness and patient morbidity. The findings may contribute to the development of minimally invasive regenerative approaches for peri-implant phenotype modification and esthetic enhancement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thin Peri-implant Mucosal Phenotype

Keywords

  • Microneedling
  • Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin
  • i-PRF
  • Peri-implant soft tissue augmentation
  • Implant Esthetics
  • Mucosal Thickness
  • Connective Tissue Graft
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Beirut Arab University is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Systemically healthy adults (Between 18 and 65) with one or more dental implants requiring second-stage surgery in the esthetic zone (Anteriors and Premolars).
  • Thin soft tissue phenotype: mucosal thickness or KTW \<2 mm buccally.
  • Stable osseointegrated implant, adequate restorative space, and healthy adjacent teeth.
  • Good oral hygiene (PI ≤10%), with peri-implant maintenance.
  • Signed consent + willingness for 1-year follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heavy smokers (≥10 cig/day); light smokers only if reduced.
  • Systemic/healing issues: uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromise, bleeding disorders, anticoagulants, .
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Active infection (periodontal or peri-implant).
  • No residual keratinized mucosa on buccal side.
  • Previous graft/augmentation at the site or recent surgery (\<6 months).
  • Allergies to anesthetics/materials.
  • Non-compliance with instructions or follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Connective Tissue Graft

    Participants will receive peri-implant soft tissue augmentation using a subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palate during implant second-stage surgery. The graft will be placed at the buccal aspect of the implant site to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness and improve soft tissue phenotype stability.

    Procedure: Connective Tissue Graft (CTG)

  • Experimental
    Microneedling + Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (MN+i-PRF)

    Participants will receive peri-implant soft tissue augmentation using microneedling with a sterile automated microneedling device followed by injection of autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). The procedure will be performed during implant second-stage surgery and repeated at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively.

    Procedure: Microneedling with Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (MN+i-PRF)

Interventions

  • ProcedureConnective Tissue Graft (CTG)

    Peri-implant soft tissue augmentation performed using a subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palate during implant second-stage surgery. The graft is placed at the buccal aspect of the implant site to increase mucosal thickness and improve peri-implant soft tissue phenotype.

  • ProcedureMicroneedling with Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (MN+i-PRF)

    Peri-implant soft tissue augmentation performed using automated microneedling followed by injection of autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) during implant second-stage surgery. The intervention is repeated at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively to enhance peri-implant soft tissue thickness and quality.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mucosal Thickness

    Change in buccal peri-implant mucosal thickness (mm) measured at the mid-facial aspect, 2 mm apical to the mucosal margin, using standardized transgingival probing through a custom stent. Measurements will be compared between baseline and follow-up examinations.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Keratinized Tissue Width (KTW)

    Change in keratinized tissue width (mm) measured at the mid-facial aspect from the mucosal margin to the mucogingival junction using a calibrated periodontal probe.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 Weeks

  2. Peri-implant Probing Depth (PD)

    Peri-implant probing depth (mm) measured at four sites per implant (mesiobuccal, mid-buccal, distobuccal, and lingual/palatal) using a calibrated periodontal probe and standardized probing force.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 Weeks

  3. Bleeding on Probing (BOP)

    Presence or absence of bleeding following gentle periodontal probing at four peri-implant sites. Bleeding on probing will be recorded as an indicator of peri-implant soft tissue health.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 Weeks

  4. Volumetric Soft Tissue Contour Change

    Volumetric changes in peri-implant soft tissues assessed using intraoral digital scans and three-dimensional superimposition of STL files obtained at baseline and follow-up visits.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  5. Pink Esthetic Score (PES)

    Esthetic evaluation of peri-implant soft tissues using the Pink Esthetic Score. Standardized clinical photographs will be assessed to evaluate papilla fill, soft tissue contour, level, color, and texture around the implant restoration.

    Time frame: 6 Months

  6. Postoperative Pain

    Participant-reported postoperative pain measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 24 Hours and 72 Hours Postoperatively

  7. Patient Satisfaction

    Participant satisfaction regarding treatment comfort, esthetic outcome, and willingness to undergo the procedure again, measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ayyildiz BG, Eken S, Terzioglu B. The effect of the injectable platelet-rich fibrin on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype: a preliminary, prospective, 12-month follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2026 Mar 30;30(4):159. doi: 10.1007/s00784-026-06849-0. PubMed 41910803 ↗
  • Giammarinaro E, Baldini N, Covani U, Menini M, Pesce P, Marconcini S. Does platelet-rich fibrin enhance the outcomes of peri-implant soft tissues? A systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05922-6. PubMed 40264081 ↗
  • Zurek J, Niemczyk W, Dominiak M, Niemczyk S, Wiench R, Skaba D. Gingival Augmentation Using Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF)-A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 20;13(18):5591. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185591. PubMed 39337077 ↗
  • Chetana, Sidharthan S, Dharmarajan G, Iyer S, Poulose M, Guruprasad M, Chordia D. Evaluation of microneedling with and without injectable-platelet rich fibrin for gingival augmentation in thin gingival phenotype-A randomized clinical trial. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Jan-Feb;14(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Dec 15. PubMed 38188907 ↗
  • Valli Veluri S, Gottumukkala SN, Penmetsa GS, Ramesh K, P MK, Bypalli V, Vundavalli S, Gera D. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of periodontal phenotype modification therapy using injectable platelet rich fibrin with microneedling and free gingival grafts: A prospective clinical trial. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;125(4):101744. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101744. Epub 2023 Dec 19. PubMed 38128879 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Feb 2027, 8 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2026
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 26, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 26, 2027
Last update
Jun 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07667855
Lead sponsor
Beirut Arab University
Responsible party
Nayer Aboelsaad (Professor and chairperson of Periodontology Department, Beirut Arab University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Start date
Jun 26, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 26, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 26, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Ranim Ahmad, Msc Oral & Dental Surgery
Contact
raneem-ahmad1998@hotmail.com
+961 79129351
Nayer Aboelsaad, PHD
study chair · Beirut Arab University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion