ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07667023Updated Jun 24, 2026

Virtual Reality Headset as an Alternative Tool for Reducing Dental Anxiety

An interventional study of Virtual reality headset and standard dental care in Neurodevelopmental Disorder (Diagnosis), sponsored by Semmelweis University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Hungary. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Semmelweis University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of virtual reality (VR) headsets can have a positive effect on dental fear during dental procedures and stress induced by the dental environment. Particular attention is paid to children with mild intellectual disabilities and those living with neurodevelopmental disorders (autism spectrum disorder), for whom these factors may hinder the successful completion of procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurodevelopmental Disorder (Diagnosis)

Keywords

  • autism spectrum disorder
  • dental anxiety
  • child
  • pediatric dentistry
03

In context

Neurodevelopmental Disorders

352 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurodevelopmental Disorders; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 88 across 217 interventional studies indexed under Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Browse Neurodevelopmental Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Semmelweis University is the lead sponsor of 140 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 6-12
  • At least one decayed primary tooth
  • A consent form signed voluntarily by a parent or legal guardian after receiving information

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient or legal guardian refuses to participate in the study.
  • A patient who is completely uncooperative
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Children with special needs who wear VR headsets during dental treatment.

    Device: Virtual reality headset

  • Active comparator
    Children with special needs who participate in dental treatment without VR headsets.

    Other: standard dental care

  • Experimental
    Typically developing children who wear VR headsets during dental treatment

    Device: Virtual reality headset

  • Active comparator
    Typically developing children who participate in the study without using VR glasses.

    Other: standard dental care

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual reality headset

    Useing VR headset during dental treatments

  • Otherstandard dental care

    Standard dental treatments without VR headset

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Child Dental Anxiety via Venham Picture Scale (VPS)

    The VPS is a self-report visual scale consisting of 8 pairs of drawings representing anxious and non-anxious children. The child selects the picture that best reflects their emotional state. Total score ranges from 0 (no anxiety) to 8 (maximum anxiety). Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.

    Time frame: Evaluated at 6 specific time points: immediately before and within 5 minutes after the dental examination (Session 1, Day 1), the oral hygiene treatment (Session 2, Day 22), and the restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43).

  2. Physiological Manifestation of Dental Anxiety via Pulse Rate

    Objective, physiological measurement of actual dental anxiety and stress response. Heart rate (measured in beats per minute) is used as an objective indicator for sympathetic nervous system arousal triggered by dental fear.

    Time frame: Continuously monitored (every 4 seconds) during each procedure: dental examination (Session 1, Day 1), oral hygiene treatment (Session 2, Day 22), and restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Child Dental Anxiety via Facial Image Scale (FIS)

    The FIS is a self-report scale comprising 5 faces ranging from very happy (score 1) to very unhappy (score 5). The child points to the face they feel most like at the moment. Higher scores indicate greater distress

    Time frame: Evaluated at 6 specific time points: immediately before and within 5 minutes after the dental examination (Session 1, Day 1), the oral hygiene treatment (Session 2, Day 22), and the restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43).

  2. Child Cooperation and Behavior via Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (FBRS)

    The FBRS is a 4-point clinical rating scale used by the dentist to evaluate child cooperation. Scores range from 1 (definitely negative, refusal of treatment) to 4 (definitely positive, good rapport and enjoyment of the treatment). Higher scores indicate better cooperation.

    Time frame: Evaluated within 5 minutes after the completion of each active procedure and reported for each session: dental examination (Session 1, Day 1), oral hygiene treatment (Session 2, Day 22), and restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43).

  3. Clinical Evaluation of Behavior via Venham Anxiety and Behavior Scale (VABS)

    A 6-point clinical rating scale (ranging from 0 to 5) scored by the investigator to assess the child's state of anxiety and cooperative behavior based on specified objective behavioral criteria during dental care. A score of 0 represents a calm, relaxed state, while a score of 5 indicates extreme anxiety accompanied by the total refusal of dental treatment. Higher scores reflect greater anxiety and uncooperative behavior.

    Time frame: Evaluated within 5 minutes after the completion of each active procedure and reported for each session: dental examination (Session 1, Day 1), oral hygiene treatment (Session 2, Day 22), and restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43).

  4. Change in Dental Anxiety via Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS)

    A 4-item self-report questionnaire assessing general dental anxiety. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale. Total score ranges from 4 (no anxiety) to 20 (severe anxiety). Higher scores indicate higher levels of dental anxiety.

    Time frame: Immediately before dental examination (Session 1, Day 1) and within 5 minutes after restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43).

  5. Change in Dental Fear via Dental Fear Survey (DFS)

    A 20-item self-report questionnaire measuring a participant's denral fear. Items are scored on a 5-point scale. Total score ranges from 20 to 100. Higher scores indicate more negative beliefs and lower trust.

    Time frame: Immediately before dental examination (Session 1, Day 1) and within 5 minutes after restorative treatment (Session 3, Day 43).

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07667023
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Start date
Jun 12, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion