CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07665931SIMEO-RV COPDUpdated Jun 24, 2026

Effect of Simeox® on Residual Volume in COPD Patients With Pulmonary Hyperinflation

An interventional study of Simeox in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Pulmonary Hyperinflation, sponsored by Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Lodi. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Lodi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary People with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have too much air trapped in their lungs (pulmonary hyperinflation). This makes it hard to breathe and reduces quality of life. This study tests whether a single session with a medical device called Simeox® can reduce the amount of air trapped in the lungs. Simeox® works by applying gentle intermittent negative pressure during exhalation to help air move out of the lungs more easily. Patients with severe or very severe COPD and documented hyperinflation will undergo lung function measurements before and immediately after a 20-minute Simeox® session. The main measurement is the change in residual volume (RV), which is the amount of air left in the lungs after a full exhalation. We will also measure changes in other lung volumes, breathlessness, and any side effects. This is a single-arm pilot study enrolling 23 patients at one center in Italy (ASST Lodi). The study is non-profit and has been approved by the Ethics Committee Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 1 (CET Lombardia 1).

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description Pulmonary hyperinflation is a key pathophysiological feature of advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), resulting from air trapping due to airflow obstruction and reduced elastic recoil. It is strongly associated with dyspnea, exercise intolerance, and impaired quality of life. Reducing residual volume (RV) is therefore a clinically meaningful therapeutic target in patients with severe and very severe COPD.

Simeox® is a CE-marked electro-medical device currently used in clinical practice for bronchial secretion drainage. It applies intermittent negative pressure at high frequency (6-12 Hertz, Hz) during the expiratory phase, with the aim of increasing expiratory flow velocity and promoting air mobilization. While the device is routinely used in patients with bronchial hypersecretion, its potential effect on static lung volumes in patients with hyperinflation - regardless of the presence of significant secretions - has not been systematically investigated.

This prospective, single-arm, non-controlled pilot study aims to explore the immediate effect of a single Simeox® session on RV in patients with severe or very severe COPD and documented pulmonary hyperinflation.

Study procedure:

Each participant undergoes baseline lung function assessment using spirometry and nitrogen wash-out (N₂ wash-out), followed by a single Simeox® treatment session lasting approximately 20 minutes (4 series of 10 tidal breathing cycles in a seated position, with rest breaks according to tolerance). During each breathing cycle, the patient performs slow controlled exhalations while the device applies high-frequency intermittent negative pressure modulated to the maximum tolerated intensity. Lung function measurements are repeated immediately after the session (within 30 minutes).

Safety monitoring:

Respiratory rate, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) are monitored throughout the session. Adverse events are recorded and classified by type, severity, and relationship to the treatment. Tolerability is assessed through subjective patient rating and dyspnea score variation.

Statistical analysis:

Pre- and post-intervention comparisons will be performed using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test depending on data distribution (significance level p \< 0.05). Sample size was calculated based on a clinically meaningful RV reduction of 0.40 L (standard deviation, SD: 0.60 L), yielding a minimum of 21 patients (80% power, α = 0.05), with 23 patients planned to account for dropouts.

This pilot study will provide the methodological basis for designing a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a larger sample and longer follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Pulmonary Hyperinflation

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Pulmonary Hyperinflation
  • Residual Volume
  • Air Trapping
  • Simeox
  • Intermittent Negative Pressure
  • airway Clearance
  • Lung Volumes
  • Nitrogen Washout
  • Spirometry
  • Dyspnea
  • Respiratory Physiotherapy
  • Pilot Study
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of severe or very severe COPD (GOLD stage 3-4)
  • Documented pulmonary hyperinflation defined by at least one of the following criteria measured by nitrogen wash-out (N₂ wash-out):
  • Residual volume (RV) > 150% of predicted
  • Functional residual capacity (FRC) > 130% of predicted
  • Total lung capacity (TLC) > 120% of predicted
  • RV/TLC ratio > 40%
  • Clinical stability (no exacerbations in the 3 weeks prior to enrollment)
  • Patients for whom assessment of the effect of Simeox® on reduction of pulmonary hyperinflation is considered clinically appropriate, in the context of exploratory device use
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active or recent pneumothorax (\< 6 weeks), predisposition to pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, or known pleural fragility
  • Active or recent gross haemoptysis (\< 6 weeks) or active pulmonary haemorrhage
  • Haemodynamic instability
  • Unstable cardiovascular conditions, including:
  • Recent myocardial infarction
  • Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled arrhythmias
  • Unstable heart failure
  • Recent cardiothoracic surgery (\< 3 months), including oesophageal surgery
  • Recent thoracic trauma or severe acute lung injury
  • Continuous mechanical ventilation, active need for inspiratory assistance, or tracheostomy
  • Neuromuscular diseases with respiratory muscle weakness
  • Inspiratory muscle weakness precluding increased respiratory effort
  • Oropharyngeal or oral muscle weakness
  • Inability to cough effectively, forcefully and autonomously
  • Severe restrictive lung disease (TLC \< 60% of predicted)
  • Airways at risk of aspiration (e.g. recent nasogastric tube feeding)
  • Uncontrolled gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Simeox Treatment

    All enrolled patients undergo a single session of treatment with the Simeox® device. Lung function is assessed before and immediately after the session. No control or comparator group is included.

    Device: Simeox

Interventions

  • DeviceSimeox

    Single treatment session of approximately 20 minutes with the Simeox® electro-medical device. The session consists of 4 series of 10 tidal breathing cycles performed in a seated position, with rest breaks according to patient tolerance. During each breathing cycle, the patient performs slow controlled exhalations while the device applies high-frequency intermittent negative pressure (6-12 Hz), modulated to the maximum tolerated intensity. Treatment efficacy is monitored through visual indicators integrated into the device.

    Also known as: Intermittent Negative Pressure Device

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Residual Volume (RV)

    Absolute change in residual volume (ΔRV, liters) measured by nitrogen wash-out (N₂ wash-out) before and immediately after a single Simeox® treatment session

    Time frame: Baseline and within 30 minutes after the end of the treatment session

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Residual Capacity (FRC)

    Absolute change in functional residual capacity (ΔFRC, liters) measured by nitrogen wash-out (N₂ wash-out) before and immediately after the treatment session

    Time frame: Baseline and within 30 minutes after the end of the treatment session

  2. Change in Vital Capacity (VC)

    Absolute change in vital capacity (ΔVC, liters) measured by spirometry before and immediately after the treatment session

    Time frame: Baseline and within 30 minutes after the end of the treatment session

  3. Change in Dyspnea Score

    Change in dyspnea assessed using the modified Borg CR10 scale (range 0-10; higher scores indicate greater dyspnea) before and immediately after the treatment session

    Time frame: Baseline and within 30 minutes after the end of the treatment session

  4. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Number and type of adverse events classified by severity (mild, moderate, severe) and relationship to the treatment (related, probably related, unrelated)

    Time frame: From the start of the treatment session up to 30 minutes after session completion

  5. Treatment Tolerability

    Tolerability assessed by subjective patient rating at the end of the session (tolerated / poorly tolerated / not tolerated) and by the need to interrupt or modify the session due to discomfort or adverse symptoms

    Time frame: From the start of the treatment session up to 30 minutes after session completion

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • . Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2008.
  • Hartman JE, Ten Hacken NH, Klooster K, Boezen HM, de Greef MH, Slebos DJ. The minimal important difference for residual volume in patients with severe emphysema. Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1137-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00219111. Epub 2012 Mar 22. PubMed 22441742 ↗
  • Fessler HE, Scharf SM, Permutt S. Improvement in spirometry following lung volume reduction surgery: application of a physiologic model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan 1;165(1):34-40. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.1.2101149. PubMed 11779727 ↗
  • Hopkinson NS, Toma TP, Hansell DM, Goldstraw P, Moxham J, Geddes DM, Polkey MI. Effect of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction on dynamic hyperinflation and exercise in emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Mar 1;171(5):453-60. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200407-961OC. Epub 2004 Dec 3. PubMed 15579725 ↗
  • Wanger J, Clausen JL, Coates A, Pedersen OF, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, Johnson D, Macintyre N, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pellegrino R, Viegi G. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J. 2005 Sep;26(3):511-22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035005. No abstract available. PubMed 16135736 ↗
  • O'Donnell DE, Laveneziana P. Dyspnea and activity limitation in COPD: mechanical factors. COPD. 2007 Sep;4(3):225-36. doi: 10.1080/15412550701480455. PubMed 17729066 ↗
  • Garcia-Rio F, Lores V, Mediano O, Rojo B, Hernanz A, Lopez-Collazo E, Alvarez-Sala R. Daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is mainly associated with dynamic hyperinflation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep 15;180(6):506-12. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1873OC. Epub 2009 Jun 19. PubMed 19542481 ↗
  • Puente-Maestu L, Stringer WW. Hyperinflation and its management in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2006;1(4):381-400. doi: 10.2147/copd.2006.1.4.381. PubMed 18044095 ↗
  • Cooper CB. The connection between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease symptoms and hyperinflation and its impact on exercise and function. Am J Med. 2006 Oct;119(10 Suppl 1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.004. PubMed 16996896 ↗
  • Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Updated 2024.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared, given the exploratory and pilot nature of the study, the small sample size (23 patients), and the need to protect participant privacy in accordance with Italian and European data protection regulations (GDPR). Aggregate results will be made publicly available through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and/or presentation at scientific conferences within 12 months of study completion, as required by the approving Ethics Committee (CET Lombardia 1).

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07665931
Lead sponsor
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Lodi
Responsible party
Andrea Di Matteo (Principal investigator, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Lodi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Start date
May 5, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Andrea Di Matteo, dr
Contact
andrea.dimatteo@asst-lodi.it
+393387123135

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion