CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07662980Updated Jun 23, 2026

The Prevalence of Hyperglycemia in Surgical Patients With Pre-diabetes

An observational study in Prediabetes or Diabetes, Surgery Complications and Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery, sponsored by University of Calgary. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
750
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to measure the prevalence and risks of hyperglycemia in surgical patients with prediabetes. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the prevalence of hyperglycemia in surgical patients with prediabetes?
  • What is the relative risk of postoperative complications associated with hyperglycemia?

To answer these questions, surgical patients with prediabetes will undergo universal glucose measurement in the perioperative period. Glucose data will be analyzed in conjunction with electronic health record (EHR) data describing patient outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Background

Day-of-surgery and postoperative ('perioperative') hyperglycemia are modifiable risk factors for complications after non-cardiac surgery, including surgical site infections, 30-day readmissions, and mortality. Data from Alberta suggests perioperative hyperglycemia is common among people without diabetes, affecting about 13% of people with prediabetes on the day-of-surgery and 18% of people without diabetes after surgery. Paradoxically, the risks of perioperative hyperglycemia appear to be two-times greater for people with prediabetes than for people with diabetes and the reasons for this are unknown. Current estimates of the prevalence of perioperative for people with prediabetes are limited. Understanding the true prevalence would inform individual decision-making around surgery, the need for further research about the true association of hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes, and clinical decisions about the utility of measuring glucose for all people with prediabetes around the time of surgery.

Objectives

This prospective cohort study will establish the prevalence of perioperativehyperglycemia in people with prediabetes undergoing scheduled (elective and urgent) non-cardiac surgeries. This information will inform:

  1. Patients, to better understand their individual risks of elective surgery.
  2. Clinicians, on the need for perioperative glucose measurement for patients with prediabetes.
  3. Researchers, on the need for and design of further studies.

Methods Overview

We will measure glucose in all adult patients with prediabetes undergoing scheduled (elective and urgent) non-cardiac surgeries throughout the perioperative period (referring to the day of surgery and up to the first 3 postoperative days or discharge, whichever comes first) to determine the prevalence of perioperative dysglycemia in people with prediabetes.

This project will leverage established data sources and linkages to address secondary and exploratory objectives: (1) Use in-hospital insulin prescribing data to describe current practices for treatment of perioperative hyperglycemia in people with prediabetes; (2) Explore the association between clinical outcomes like infections and length of stay with perioperative hyperglycemia in people with prediabetes; and (3) Compare the prevalence of perioperative hyperglycemia and the association of hyperglycemia with clinical outcomes between the intervention period and a historical control period (pre-intervention at the same hospital) and a contemporaneous, non-intervention site (UAH, Edmonton) to examine whether the 'prediabetes paradox' is a result of confounding by indication or another cause.

Outcomes

If the prevalence of perioperative hyperglycemia in people with prediabetes is sufficiently high, clinical guidelines should recommend perioperative glycemic monitoring for patients with prediabetes. Further, if there is an association between hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes, intervention-based studies are needed to determine whether this risk is modifiable with hyperglycemia treatment.

Team

The NPI and co-investigators have led a 5-year implementation science and quality improvement study to improve perioperative glycemic management for people with diabetes in Alberta. This interdisciplinary group of patients, nurses, endocrinologists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, internists, and implementation scientists will leverage their existing data access, professional networks, and content expertise to conduct this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prediabetes or Diabetes
  • Surgery Complications
  • Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery
  • Stress Hyperglycemia

Keywords

  • Prediabetes
  • Prevalence
  • Surgical Complications
  • Perioperative Hyperglycemia
03

In context

Prediabetic State

999 studies on the registry are indexed under Prediabetic State; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 750 is above the median of 216 across 128 observational studies indexed under Prediabetic State.

Browse Prediabetic State studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Surgical in-patients at the Foothills Medical Centre.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hemoglobin A1c measurement between 6 and 6.4%
  • Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18
  • Pregnancy
  • Any formal diabetes diagnosis
  • Current use of medications that influence blood glucose regardless of the indication
  • Undergoing cardiac, intracranial neurosurgery, bariatric, or pancreatic surgeries
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
750 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Surgical Patients with Prediabetes

    Adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgeries who have pre-diabetes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of perioperative hyperglycemia

    Prediabetes will be defined as described in Section 4.2 using Diabetes Canada definitions. The perioperative period will include the day of surgery and the early postoperative period. The day of surgery includes surgical admitting, intraoperative, and recovery room on postoperative day (POD) 0, which is the day that surgery was completed until 23:59. The early postoperative period will be defined as the first 3 full postoperative days, in keeping with studies that have demonstrated that hyperglycemia is most common in the first 72 hours after surgery and that early hyperglycemia is associated with greater 30-day postoperative mortality. Hyperglycemia will be defined using Diabetes Canada reference ranges as any glucose value \>10.0 mmol/L by any form of glucose measurement.

    Time frame: Up to the first 3 postoperative days or discharge, whichever comes first.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-operative complications

    Postoperative complications are defined in accordance with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), a standardized list of preventable complications developed by surgeons and used internationally to describe hospital-level quality of surgical care. These include the following adverse events within 30 days of surgery: SSIs (superficial, deep incisional, organ/space, using the Centres for Disease Control definitions), wound dehiscence, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, pulmonary embolism, ventilator use \>48 hours, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, transfusion complications, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, septic shock, Clostridium difficile infection, death, readmissions, and unplanned reoperations.

    Time frame: Within 30 days of surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ruzycki SM, Harrison TG, Lithgow KC, Cameron A, Philp L, Heatlie L, Esmail R, Ejaredar M, Helmle K, McKeen J, Dillane D. Day-of-surgery quality gaps in glycemic management: a retrospective cohort study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Nov 25;14(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00628-3. PubMed 41291884 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD, specifically deidentified patient data will be shared upon reasonable request by fellow research teams.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07662980
Lead sponsor
University of Calgary
Responsible party
Shannon Ruzycki (Assistant Professor, University of Calgary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Study contacts

Shannon Ruzycki, MD
Contact
shannon.ruzycki@ucalgary.ca
+1 (403) 604-1642
Shannon Ruzycki, MD
principal investigator · University of Calgary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion