ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07655102PROSP_BRUGANAEUpdated Sep 8, 2026

Prospective Multicentre Observational Registry of Peri-procedural Anaesthesia, Sedation and Related Medication Exposure in Patients With Brugada Syndrome

An observational study in Brugada Syndrome (BrS), Ventricular Arrhythmia and Anesthesia, sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the perioperative risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in adult patients diagnosed with Brugada Syndrome undergoing anaesthetic procedures. Brugada Syndrome is a rare inherited cardiac condition associated with an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, and perioperative management remains challenging due to limited high-quality evidence.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias during anaesthesia and up to 30 days after the procedure?
  • Are anaesthetic drugs traditionally considered "non-recommended" associated with an increased risk of perioperative arrhythmic events?

Researchers will also explore the relative contribution of anaesthetic drugs versus perioperative physiological factors (e.g., haemodynamic changes, fever, bradycardia) in triggering arrhythmias.

Participants will:

  • Undergo anaesthetic procedures (general, locoregional, or sedation) as part of routine clinical care
  • Have clinical data collected prospectively from electronic medical records during the perioperative period
  • Be followed for 30 days after the procedure to assess outcomes, including arrhythmias, complications, ICU admission, and mortality

This is a multicentre, prospective observational registry, and no additional interventions or changes to standard clinical practice will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brugada Syndrome (BrS)
  • Ventricular Arrhythmia
  • Anesthesia
  • Sedation

Keywords

  • Brugada Syndrome
  • Anaesthesia
  • Anesthesia
  • Perioperative Care
  • Ventricular Arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias
  • Perioperative Risk
  • Anesthetic Drugs
  • Propofol
  • Sodium Channel Blockers
  • Observational Registry
  • Multicentre Study
03

In context

Brugada Syndrome

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Brugada Syndrome; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 155 across 34 observational studies indexed under Brugada Syndrome.

Browse Brugada Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona is the lead sponsor of 327 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome receiving care at participating tertiary and secondary hospitals. Patients will be identified through preoperative anaesthesia assessments, hospital admissions, and operating room schedules. The registry will include consecutive patients undergoing any type of anaesthetic procedure (general, locoregional, or sedation) for surgical or non-surgical interventions as part of routine clinical care. Participating centres are expected to include institutions with experience in the perioperative management of cardiac patients, ensuring representation of real-world clinical practice across different healthcare settings.

Eligibility criteria

Patients should match all the inclusion criteria to be entered for data collection:

  • Documented type 1 Brugada pattern (spontaneous, fever-related, or induced by sodium-channel blocker challenge/other recognised provocation test) with a diagnosis considered compatible with Brugada syndrome by the treating cardiology team.
  • Undergoing general anaesthesia, monitored sedation, loco-regional anaesthesia for any surgical, diagnostic, interventional, obstetric or other non-surgical procedure (including epidural analgesia for labour and sedation for endoscopy).

Patients with one or more exclusion criteria will not be included for data collection and analysis:

  • No documented type 1 Brugada ECG pattern, uncertain diagnosis without sufficient supporting data.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Brugada Syndrome Patients Undergoing Anaesthesia

    Adult patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome undergoing anaesthetic procedures (general, locoregional, or sedation) for surgical or non-surgical interventions. This is an observational cohort with no assigned interventions. Anaesthetic management, including the use of specific drugs (e.g., propofol, local anaesthetics, ketamine), will be performed according to routine clinical practice. Participants will be followed during the perioperative period and up to 30 days after the procedure to assess the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and other clinical outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of cardiac arrhytmia from the start of anaesthesia/sedation until 24 hours after the procedure

    To determine the incidence of sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, arrhythmic cardiac arrest, aborted sudden cardiac death, or appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmia from the start of anaesthesia/sedation until 24 hours after the procedure.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative anesthetic management strategies in BrS patients

    Intraoperative anesthetic management strategies in BrS patients, including use of general anaesthesia, monitored sedation, neuraxial and regional techniques across surgical, diagnostic, obstetric and non-surgical settings.

    Time frame: During the anesthesic procedure

  2. Peri-procedural complications and relevant ECG changes

    To evaluate peri-procedural complications and relevant ECG changes, including dynamic type 1 pattern changes, bradyarrhythmias, supraventricular arrhythmias, haemodynamic instability, fever and electrolyte disturbances.

    Time frame: During the anesthesic procedure

  3. Periprocedural complications

    To assess ICU/PACU admission rates, unplanned escalation of care, need for car-dioversion/defibrillation, and peri-procedural ICD management.

    Time frame: Perioperative

  4. 30 days outcome

    To analyse 30-day outcomes, including ventricular arrhythmic events, mortality and hospital re-admission

    Time frame: 30 days after the anesthesic procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Espinosa A, Ripolles-Melchor J, Brugada R, Campuzano O, Sarquella-Brugada G, Abad-Motos A, Zaballos-Garcia M, Abad-Torrent A, Prieto-Gundin A, Brugada J. Brugada Syndrome: anesthetic considerations and management algorithm. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Feb;85(2):173-188. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.13170-1. Epub 2018 Oct 30. PubMed 30394071 ↗
  • Ojaimi RE, Carteron M, Arnold S, Broux N, Corsia G, Zicarelli JP, Benhamou D. Neuraxial anesthesia for delivery in parturtients with Brugada syndrome: Local anesthetics revisited. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 May;52(5):102562. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102562. Epub 2023 Feb 27. No abstract available. PubMed 36858196 ↗
  • Ripley A, Castro J, Gadsden J. Local anesthetics, neuraxial anesthesia, and the Brugada syndrome. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Feb;25(1):78-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Dec 12. No abstract available. PubMed 23246496 ↗
  • Cole JB, Sattiraju S, Bilden EF, Asinger RW, Bertog SC. Isolated tramadol overdose associated with Brugada ECG pattern. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug;35(8):e219-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02924.x. Epub 2010 Oct 7. PubMed 21039643 ↗
  • Rollin A, Maury P, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Brugada J. Transient ST elevation after ketamine intoxication: a new cause of acquired brugada ECG pattern. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Jan;22(1):91-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01766.x. PubMed 20384648 ↗
  • Cuttone G, Martucci G, Napoli R, Tigano S, Arcadipane A, Pappalardo F, Sanfilippo F. Anesthesiological management of Brugada syndrome patients: A systematic review. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Jul-Sep;17(3):394-400. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_205_23. Epub 2023 Jun 22. PubMed 37601502 ↗
  • Duque M, Santos L, Ribeiro S, Catre D. Anesthesia and Brugada syndrome: a 12-year case series. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Dec 7. PubMed 28183560 ↗
  • Flamee P, Viaene K, Tosi M, Nogueira Carvalho H, de Asmundis C, Forget P, Poelaert J. Propofol for Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Single-Center, 25-Year, Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2021 Jun 1;132(6):1645-1653. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005540. PubMed 33857025 ↗
  • Flamee P, Varnavas V, Dewals W, Carvalho H, Cools W, Bhutia JT, Beckers S, Umbrain V, Verborgh C, Forget P, Chierchia GB, Brugada P, Poelaert J, de Asmundis C. Electrocardiographic Effects of Propofol versus Etomidate in Patients with Brugada Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2020 Mar;132(3):440-451. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003030. PubMed 31743136 ↗
  • Postema PG, Wolpert C, Amin AS, Probst V, Borggrefe M, Roden DM, Priori SG, Tan HL, Hiraoka M, Brugada J, Wilde AA. Drugs and Brugada syndrome patients: review of the literature, recommendations, and an up-to-date website (www.brugadadrugs.org). Heart Rhythm. 2009 Sep;6(9):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Jul 8. PubMed 19716089 ↗
  • Borrell-Vega J, Fernandez Font JD, Linares M, Martinez-Palli G, Isabel-Roquero A, Mont L, Brugada J, Arbelo E, Gimenez-Mila M. Eighteen-year analysis of anaesthetic management in Brugada syndrome: The BRUGANAES study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 May 1;42(5):458-467. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002146. Epub 2025 Feb 12. PubMed 39945140 ↗
  • Brugada J, Campuzano O, Arbelo E, Sarquella-Brugada G, Brugada R. Present Status of Brugada Syndrome: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 28;72(9):1046-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.037. PubMed 30139433 ↗
  • Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Nov 15;20(6):1391-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90253-j. PubMed 1309182 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 22 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2026
First posted
Jun 17, 2026
StartActual
Jul 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 20, 2028
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07655102
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 17, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2026
Primary completion
May 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion