CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07645079Updated Jun 12, 2026

Automated Insulin Delivery Versus Daily Injections for Hospital Diabetes Care

An interventional study of automated insulin delivery system and GlucoTab in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Infection and CGM, sponsored by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim

The investigators aim to investigate if automated insulin delivery systems (AID) improve in-hospital glycemic and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to standard-of-care with a pen-basal-bolus insulin regimen manually titrated by general staff at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital and a clinical decision support system (GlucoTab) titrating the basal-bolus regimen automatically daily at Graz University Hospital.

Population

Hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes in non-intensive care units (non-ICU) at medical wards at Copenhagen University Hospitals of Herley-Gentofte (affiliated with Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen) and Medical University Hospital of Graz (N = 92).

Design

This is an investigator-initiated, two-armed, two-site, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial.

Objectives

The objective is to determine the glycemic and clinical effects of inpatient AID systems in non-ICU patients with type 2 diabetes. Participants will be randomized in a usual-of-care and an AID arm. Diabetes management will be performed by usual care in the control arm based on a basal-bolus insulin regimen and point-of-care (POC) glucose testing. A continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system (Abbott FreeStyle Libre 3) will be used in all groups for outcome analysis and comparison between the groups. The CGM will be blinded for the control arm, to not interfere with the usual of care because of the higher amount of glucose data. The AID-arm will be managed by an AID system with real-time CGM data transmitted to nursing stations.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: The primary outcome is the difference in CGM-recorded time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dl (3.9-10.0 mmol/l)) between the POC- and the CGM-arm according to the 2023 in-hospital CGM consensus during the entire hospital stay.

Secondary outcomes: Outcomes are reported according to the 2023 in-hospital CGM consensus and specified in the protocol during the entire hospital stay, including three levels of time above range (TAR) 180-250mg/dl (10.0-13.9 mmol/l), >250mg/dl (>13.9 mmol/l), and >180mg/dl (>10.0 mmol/l); three levels of time below range (TBR) 54-70mg/dl (3.0-3.9 mmol/l), \<54mg/dl (\<3.0 mmol/l), and \<70mg/dl (\<3.9 mmol/l); events of hypoglycemia in three levels, 54-68mg/dl (3.0-3.8 mmol/l), \<54mg/dl (\< 3.0 mmol/l), and \<70mg/dl (\<3.9 mmol/l), where the glucose values between the two hypoglycemic events must all be >70mg/dl (>3.9 mmol/l) for at least 15 consecutive minutes(1), including prolonged hypoglycemic events (> 120 minutes), recurrent hypoglycemic events (events preceded by another hypoglycemic event), and recurrent hypoglycemic days (percentage of days with at least one hypoglycemic event on separate days that is preceded by another in-hospital day with hypoglycemia(1)); mean glucose level; standard deviation (SD) of the CGM glucose distribution; coefficient of variation (CV); and insulin doses during hospitalization.

Clinical outcomes: The investigator assess the length of hospital stay as calculated from time of admission until discharge; in-hospital mortality; admissions to intensive care unit; any in-hospital-related complications occurring at least one day after randomization and until discharge, as documented and defined by the treating physician in the electronic health record (e.g., acute kidney injurie, sepsis, etc.)

Method

For the usual-of-care-arm, glucose assessment is done by standard POC glucose testing and insulin is manually titrated by general staff at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital and the glucose assessment is done by standard POC glucose testing and insulin is manually titrated by the GlucoTab system titrating the basal-bolus regimen automatically daily at Graz University Hospital. For the AID-arm, CGM data informs in real time the mylife Ypsopump for automated insulin delivery.

Device

The investigational device is the AID system, containing of the mylife YpsoPump and the FreeStyle Libre 3 sensor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
  • Infection
  • CGM

Keywords

  • automated insulin delivery systems
  • AID
  • CGM
  • continouse glucose monitoring
  • infectiouse disease
  • type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • diabetes mellitus type 2
  • GlucoTab
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A documented history of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) which requires subcutaneous insulin therapy
  • acute infectious disease of any kind
  • age ≥ 18 years old
  • willingness and ability to comply with theclinical investigation plan
  • ability to communicate with the trial personal
  • an expected length of hospital stay for at least 2 days after enrolment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients already using AID for their glycemic management
  • Patients in use of an insulin pump
  • Skin pathologies that hinder application of a FreeStyle Libre-3 CGM and mylife YpsoPump
  • Participation in another trial, which could influence the outcome of the trial
  • Any mental condition rendering the patient incapable of giving informed consent
  • Known or suspected allergy to adhesive material/tape of the Libre-3-sensor and/or YpsoPump
  • Any disease or condition which the investigator or treating physician feels would interfere with the trial or the safety of the patient
  • Diagnoses/treatments/clinical parameters prohibiting use of Insulin/AID such as

    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 OR
    • Treated with hydroxyurea/hydroxycarbamide OR
    • Nutritional therapy (continuous enteral or parenteral feeding) OR
    • Clinically relevant pancreatic disease OR
    • Aystemic glucocorticoid treatment with prednisone equivalent dose >5 mg/day OR
    • Expected to require admission to the intensive-care unit OR > Patients in dialysis
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
92 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AID-arm

    In the AID-arm, participants will be equipped with a Freestyle libre-3 CGM to collect the glucose data and communicated with the mylife YpsoPump for insulin application. As part of the AID system, the participants will also be equipped with the CE-marked mylife Ypsopump to administer the needed insulin dose during the day. The insulin used for the pump for the glycaemic control of the participants will be insulin aspart.(6) The Freestyle libre-3 CGM and the YpsoPump will be coupled together in an AID system via the the mylife CamAPS HX app on a smartphone.

    Device: automated insulin delivery system

  • Placebo comparator
    Control-Arm

    In the control-arm, glucose levels are assessed with POC glucose testing at 03:00 h, pre-prandial at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and before bedtime (22:00 h) or for subjects not eating at 03:00 h., 08:00 h., 12:00 h., 17:00 h., and 22:00 h as per standard of care. A blinded CGM is mounted for outcome analysis. At admission, non-insulin antidiabetic medications will be paused, and the control-arm participants will be treated by usual-of-care with a pen based a basal-bolus regimen Participants at Graz University Hospital are ordered the same basal-bolus insulin regimen as in the usual-of-care arm at Steno Diabetes center Copenhagen, however, insulin is not manually titrated, but titration is based daily on the GlucoTab system, a clinical decision support validated for the inpatient setting in titrating insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes as this is the usual of care at Graz University hospital.

    Procedure: GlucoTab · Procedure: Control-arm

Interventions

  • Deviceautomated insulin delivery system

    To date, no randomized controlled trials have evaluated inpatient use - including bolus insulin - in patients with infectious disease.

    Also known as: AID, cloosed-loop system

  • ProcedureGlucoTab

    Participants at Graz University Hospital are basal-bolus insulin regimen , however, insulin is not manually titrated, but titration is based daily on the GlucoTab system, a clinical decision support validated for the inpatient setting in titrating insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes as this is the usual of care at MUG. The GlucoTab-arm will be titrated initially by the principal Investigator or sub principal investigator and afterwards by the general ward nurses of MUG.

  • ProcedureControl-arm

    In the control-arm, glucose levels are assessed with POC glucose testing at 03:00 h, pre-prandial at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and before bedtime (22:00 h) or for participants not eating at 03:00 h, 08:00 h, 12:00 h, 17:00 h, and 22:00 h. Those collected glucose levels will be automatically transferred to the EHR. If POC glucose testing is not prescribed or performed five times daily as standard of care, the research staff may encourage usual ward nurses to do so. The investigat will also mount a FreeStyle Libre-3 CGM on each participant like descripted in the section above to be able to have a better comparison of the glucose levels throughout the day in both arms. This glucose data will be blinded and as such only be available for the diabetes research team in the end of the trial and not for the general wards. At admission, non-insulin antidiabetic medications will be paused, and the control-arm participants will be treated by usual-of-care with a pen based a basal-bolus regimen

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time in range

    The difference in CGM-recorded time in range of 70-180 mg/dl (3.9-10.0 mmol/l) between the control-arm and the AID-arm

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time above range level 1

    The difference in CGM-recorded time in range of 181 - 250 mg/dl (10.1 - 13.9 mmol/L) between the control-arm and the AID-arm

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  2. Time above range level 2

    The difference in CGM-recorded time in range of \> 250 mg/dl (\> 13.9 mmol/l between the control-arm and the AID-arm

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  3. Time below range level 1

    The difference in CGM-recorded time in the range of 54 - 70 mg/dl (3.0 - 3.9 mmol/L) between the control-arm and the AID-arm

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  4. Time below range level 2

    The difference in CGM-recorded time in the range of \< 54 mg/dl (\< 3.0 mmol/l) between the control-arm and the AID-arm

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  5. Hypoglycemic events level 1

    Hypoglycemic events (defined as three consecutive CGM measures) in the range of 54-70 mg/dl (3.0-3.9 mmol/l).

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  6. Hypoglycemic event level 2

    Hypoglycemic events (defined as three consecutive CGM measures) in the range of \<54 mg/dl (\<3.0 mmol/l).

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  7. Recurrent hypoglycemic event

    Recurrent hypoglycemic events, defined as events preceded by another hypoglycemic event. The glucose values between the two episodes must all be \> 70mg/dl (\>3.9 mmol/l) for at least 15 consecutive minutes between the sentinel and recurrent hypoglycemic events to count.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  8. Time at High Risk for Hypoglycemia

    The difference in CGM-recorded time in range of 70 - 100 mg/dl (3.9 - 5.6 mmol/l) between the control-arm and the AID-arm

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  9. Glycemia risk index

    Defined by the formula \[3.0 × % time below 54mg/dl (3.0 mmol/l)\] +\[2.4 × % time below 70mg/dl (3.9 mmol/l)\] + \[1.6 × % time above 180mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l)\] + \[0.8 × % time above 250mg/dl (13.9 mmol/l)\].

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  10. Prolonged hypoglycemic events level 1

    A hypoglycaemic event 54 - 70 mg/dl (3.0 - 3.9 mmol/l) continuously for at least 120 minutes.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  11. Prolonged hypoglycemic event level 2

    A hypoglycaemic event \<54 mg/dl (\<3.0 mmol/l) continuously for at least 120 minutes.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  12. Severe hypoglycemia

    Patient requires assistance to correct hypoglycemia.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  13. Mean sensor glucose

    Mean sensor glucose from the CGM in mg/dl (mmol/l).

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  14. Standard deviation of the glucose distribution

    The standard deviation mg/dl (mmol/l) from the CGM glucose measurements.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  15. Coefficient of variation

    The standard deviation of the glucose distribution divided by the mean glucose level.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  16. Length of stay

    The amount of time spent in the hospital from admission untill discharge from the hospital

    Time frame: From admission untill discharge from the hospital (up to 30 days)

  17. In-hospital complications

    Any in-hospital related complications occurring at least one day after randomization (e.g. acute kidney injury, sepsis, etc.)

    Time frame: One day after randomisation until discharge from the hospital (up to 30 days)

  18. Total daily insulin doses

    The amoun of daily insulin given.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

Other outcomes

  1. Questionnaires

    The validated Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Inpatients (DTSQ-IP) will be used. The questionnaires will assess the patient satisfaction level and staff satisfaction level in managing patients on either control-arm patients vs AID systems. Exploratory, the investigators will identify which patients might benefit from AID and in-hospital diabetes teams by heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses.

    Time frame: From inclusion in the trial until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

  2. Time management

    Time management for setting up the AID system and maintaining it is compared to usual-of-care (time spent monitoring POC glucose testing and administering basal-bolus regimen insulin daily).

    Time frame: From inclusion until discharge from hospital (up to 30 days)

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • University Hospital of Graz
    Graz, Styria 8036, Austria
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
    Copenhagen, 2730, Denmark
    • Mikkel Thor Olsen, MD, PhD · Contact · mikkel.thor.olsen@regionh.dk · +45 31 49 72 95
    • Mikkel Thor Olsen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Bally L, Thabit H, Hartnell S, Andereggen E, Ruan Y, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Wertli MM, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery for Glycemic Control in Noncritical Care. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):547-556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805233. Epub 2018 Jun 25. PubMed 29940126 ↗
  • Olsen MT, Klarskov CK, Jensen SH, Rasmussen LM, Lindegaard B, Andersen JA, Gottlieb H, Lunding S, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Hansen KB, Kristensen PL. In-Hospital Diabetes Management by a Diabetes Team and Insulin Titration Algorithms Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring or Point-of-Care Glucose Testing in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (DIATEC): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2025 Apr 1;48(4):569-578. doi: 10.2337/dc24-2222. PubMed 39887698 ↗
  • Sampson MJ, Singh H, Dhatariya KK, Jones C, Walden E, Bradley C. Psychometric validation and use of a novel diabetes in-patient treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Diabet Med. 2009 Jul;26(7):729-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02754.x. PubMed 19573123 ↗
  • Benfield T, Jensen JS, Nordestgaard BG. Influence of diabetes and hyperglycaemia on infectious disease hospitalisation and outcome. Diabetologia. 2007 Mar;50(3):549-54. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0570-3. Epub 2006 Dec 23. PubMed 17187246 ↗
  • Shah BR, Hux JE. Quantifying the risk of infectious diseases for people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003 Feb;26(2):510-3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2.510. PubMed 12547890 ↗
  • Bertoni AG, Saydah S, Brancati FL. Diabetes and the risk of infection-related mortality in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jun;24(6):1044-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1044. PubMed 11375368 ↗
  • YPU_eIFU_REF_700009439_BE-de_V01.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.mylife-diabetescare.com/files/media/03_Documents/01_YpsoPump/IFU/1.5/YPU_eIFU_REF_700009439_BE-de_V01.pdf
  • Rubin R, Khanna NR, McIver LA. Aspart Insulin. 2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500030/ PubMed 29763206 ↗
  • ART41641-001_rev-A-web.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 23]. Available from: https://freestyleserver.com/payloads/ifu/2023/q3/ART41641-001_rev-A-web.pdf
  • Spanakis EK, Cook CB, Kulasa K, Aloi JA, Bally L, Davis G, Dungan KM, Galindo RJ, Mendez CE, Pasquel FJ, Shah VN, Umpierrez GE, Aaron RE, Tian T, Yeung AM, Huang J, Klonoff DC. A Consensus Statement for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics for Inpatient Clinical Trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1527-1552. doi: 10.1177/19322968231191104. Epub 2023 Aug 17. PubMed 37592726 ↗
  • Boughton CK, Hartnell S, Hobday N, Lake A, Davenport K, Daly A, Ward C, Taylor C, Hovorka R, Bansiya V. Implementation of fully closed-loop insulin delivery for inpatients with diabetes: Real-world outcomes. Diabet Med. 2023 Jun;40(6):e15092. doi: 10.1111/dme.15092. Epub 2023 Mar 28. PubMed 36947090 ↗
  • Boughton CK, Bally L, Martignoni F, Hartnell S, Herzig D, Vogt A, Wertli MM, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Fully closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 May;7(5):368-377. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30061-0. Epub 2019 Mar 29. PubMed 30935872 ↗
  • Thabit H, Schofield J. Technology in the management of diabetes in hospitalised adults. Diabetologia. 2024 Oct;67(10):2114-2128. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06206-4. Epub 2024 Jul 2. PubMed 38953925 ↗
  • Hochfellner DA, Rainer R, Ziko H, Aberer F, Simic A, Lichtenegger KM, Beck P, Donsa K, Pieber TR, Fruhwald FM, Rosenkranz AR, Kamolz LP, Baumann PM, Mader JK, Plank J. Efficient and safe glycaemic control with basal-bolus insulin therapy during fasting periods in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes using decision support technology: A post hoc analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Sep;23(9):2161-2169. doi: 10.1111/dom.14458. Epub 2021 Jun 22. PubMed 34081386 ↗
  • Davis GM, Hughes MS, Brown SA, Sibayan J, Perez-Guzman MC, Stumpf M, Thompson Z, Basina M, Patel RM, Hester J, Abraham A, Ly TT, Chaney C, Tan M, Hsu L, Kollman C, Beck RW, Lal R, Buckingham B, Pasquel FJ. Automated Insulin Delivery with Remote Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Feasibility Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Oct;25(10):677-688. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0304. Epub 2023 Aug 28. PubMed 37578778 ↗
  • Thabit H, Hartnell S, Allen JM, Lake A, Wilinska ME, Ruan Y, Evans ML, Coll AP, Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):117-124. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30280-7. Epub 2016 Nov 9. PubMed 27836235 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07645079
Lead sponsor
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 12, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion