ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07643064FRAIL+APUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Multicomponent Exercise and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Program (FRAIL+AP) for Frail Older Adults in Primary Care

An interventional study of FRAIL+AP Program and Usual Care in Frail Elderly, sponsored by Alberto Bermejo Franco. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Primary conditionMotor Activity(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Motor Activity is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Alberto Bermejo Franco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Frailty is a multidimensional clinical syndrome associated with increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes in older adults. Despite strong evidence supporting multicomponent exercise interventions, their implementation in primary care settings remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the FRAIL+AP program, which integrates Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) with a 12-week multicomponent exercise intervention, including visual-spatial gait retraining using the Tapiz Fisior system.

The study will assess whether this intervention improves frailty status, physical performance, and functional independence, while reducing falls among community-dwelling older adults compared to standard care.

Read the detailed description

Frailty is a prevalent geriatric syndrome characterized by decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, including falls, disability, hospitalization, institutionalization, and mortality. The Canary Islands have one of the highest rates of frailty and pre-frailty among community-dwelling older adults in Spain, highlighting the need for effective and scalable interventions within primary care settings.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is considered the gold standard for identifying multidimensional health needs in older adults and for guiding individualized care plans. In parallel, multicomponent exercise programs incorporating strength, balance, endurance, and flexibility training have demonstrated effectiveness in improving physical function and reducing frailty-related impairments. However, challenges remain regarding the implementation of these interventions in routine primary care practice.

The FRAIL+AP study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a primary care-based intervention combining Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, health education, and a supervised multicomponent exercise program in frail and pre-frail older adults. The intervention also incorporates visual-spatial gait retraining using the Tapiz Fisior system, a structured floor-grid tool aimed at improving gait control, balance, coordination, and fall prevention.

A total of 200 community-dwelling adults aged 70 years and older will be recruited from five primary care centers in Tenerife, Spain. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or a control group receiving usual care. The intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of supervised and home-based exercise sessions, together with educational activities focused on healthy lifestyles, nutrition, frailty awareness, and fall prevention.

Primary outcomes include changes in frailty status assessed by the FRAIL Scale and physical performance measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Secondary outcomes include incidence of falls, pain perception, mood, functional independence, nutritional status, handgrip strength, healthcare resource utilization, and comorbidity measures. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and one week after completion of the intervention by blinded evaluators.

The study aims to determine whether the FRAIL+AP protocol can improve physical performance, reduce frailty, and support healthy aging through an integrated and scalable model that can be implemented within routine primary care services.

02

Conditions studied

  • Frail Elderly

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • exercise
  • frailty
  • elderly
  • physiotherapy
  • primary care
03

In context

Motor Activity Unverified

9,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,910 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 60 across 8,388 interventional studies indexed under Motor Activity.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Alberto Bermejo Franco as lead sponsor.

Compared within Motor Activity, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Community-dwelling adults aged 70 years or older.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written .
  • Medical clearance to participate in low-to-moderate intensity physical exercise.
  • Presence of frailty or pre-frailty defined by meeting at least two of the following criteria:
  • Functional independence sufficient to participate in the intervention (Barthel Index >80.
  • FRAIL Scale score ≥ 1.
  • Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score \< 10.
  • Gait speed \< 0.8 m/s.
  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) test > 12 seconds.
  • Registered at one of the participating primary care centers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute to physical exercise, including recent acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, severe uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, or severe uncorrected aortic stenosis.
  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing comprehension of study procedures or exercise instructions.
  • Severe psychiatric disorders interfering with participation.
  • Absence of a legally authorized representative when required.
  • Severe uncontrolled behavioral disturbances.
  • Any acute or chronic medical condition considered by the investigators to make participation unsafe.

Discontinuation Criteria:

  • Failure to attend the initial mandatory health education workshop.
  • Attendance at fewer than 6 of the 12 scheduled supervised exercise sessions.
  • Development of an acute medical condition that results in a temporary or permanent contraindication to physical activity.
  • Participant withdrawal of .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FRAIL+AP Program

    Participants receive a 12-week intervention consisting of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), health education, and a multicomponent exercise program combining strength, balance, mobility, flexibility, and visual-spatial gait retraining using the Tapiz Fisior system. The intervention includes one supervised session and one home-based session per week.

    Behavioral: FRAIL+AP Program

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants receive standard primary care follow-up according to the Canary Health Service guidelines, including routine medical care and general lifestyle recommendations, without participation in the FRAIL+AP structured exercise program.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralFRAIL+AP Program

    A 12-week multicomponent intervention including Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, health education, strength training, balance exercises, mobility training, flexibility exercises, and visual-spatial gait retraining using the Tapiz Fisior system. Participants attend one supervised session and perform one home-based session per week.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Standard primary care management according to regional healthcare guidelines without structured exercise intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in frailty status measured by the FRAIL Scale

    Change in FRAIL Scale score from baseline to 12 weeks. The FRAIL Scale ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater frailty (0 = robust, 1-2 = pre-frail, 3-5 = frail).

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Change in physical performance measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    Change in the total Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score from baseline to 12 weeks. The SPPB total score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better physical performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Falls

    Number of falls recorded during the study period using participant diaries and verified through electronic medical records.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Musculoskeletal Pain Intensity

    Change in musculoskeletal pain intensity measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Mood and Affective Status

    Change in depressive symptoms measured using the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). The GDS-15 total score ranges from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptomatology.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  4. Functional Independence

    Change in functional independence measured using the Barthel Index. The Barthel Index total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence in activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  5. Nutritional Status

    Change in nutritional status measured using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). The MNA total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status. Scores \<17 indicate malnutrition, 17-23.5 indicate risk of malnutrition, and 24-30 indicate normal nutritional status.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  6. Handgrip Strength

    Change in upper-limb muscle strength measured by handgrip dynamometry. The highest value obtained from standardized testing procedures will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  7. Comorbidity Burden

    Change in clinical comorbidity status assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  8. Healthcare Resource Utilization

    Healthcare utilization assessed through review of electronic medical records, including primary care visits, emergency department attendance, hospital admissions, and other healthcare contacts during the study period.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centro de Salud Tacoronte
    Tacoronte, Santa Cruz de Tenerife 38350, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, Brach J, Chandler J, Cawthon P, Connor EB, Nevitt M, Visser M, Kritchevsky S, Badinelli S, Harris T, Newman AB, Cauley J, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923. PubMed 21205966 ↗
  • Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85. PubMed 8126356 ↗
  • Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, Albarede JL. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition. 1999 Feb;15(2):116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00171-3. PubMed 9990575 ↗
  • Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4. PubMed 7183759 ↗
  • Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK. A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Jul;16(7):601-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0084-2. PubMed 22836700 ↗
  • Alegre-Tamariz J, Sanchez-Medina J, Runzer-Colmenares FM, Avila-Rodriguez C, Bermejo-Franco A, Parodi JF. Impact of a functional gait training program as a complementary strategy to improve physical function in older adults: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Geriatr. 2025 Oct 21;25(1):789. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06471-x. PubMed 41120990 ↗
  • Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Anker SD, Aprahamian I, Arai H, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Bernabei R, Cadore EL, Cesari M, Chen LK, de Souto Barreto P, Duque G, Ferrucci L, Fielding RA, Garcia-Hermoso A, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Harridge SDR, Kirk B, Kritchevsky S, Landi F, Lazarus N, Martin FC, Marzetti E, Pahor M, Ramirez-Velez R, Rodriguez-Manas L, Rolland Y, Ruiz JG, Theou O, Villareal DT, Waters DL, Won Won C, Woo J, Vellas B, Fiatarone Singh M. International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults (ICFSR): Expert Consensus Guidelines. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(7):824-853. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1665-8. PubMed 34409961 ↗
  • Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1376-1386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31785-4. PubMed 31609229 ↗
  • Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6. PubMed 31609228 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Manas L, Feart C, Mann G, Vina J, Chatterji S, Chodzko-Zajko W, Gonzalez-Colaco Harmand M, Bergman H, Carcaillon L, Nicholson C, Scuteri A, Sinclair A, Pelaez M, Van der Cammen T, Beland F, Bickenbach J, Delamarche P, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Rockwood K, Rodriguez Artalejo F, Serviddio G, Vega E; FOD-CC group (Appendix 1). Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):62-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls119. Epub 2012 Apr 16. PubMed 22511289 ↗
  • Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, Cesari M, Chumlea WC, Doehner W, Evans J, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Katz PR, Malmstrom TK, McCarter RJ, Gutierrez Robledo LM, Rockwood K, von Haehling S, Vandewoude MF, Walston J. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022. PubMed 23764209 ↗
  • Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. PubMed 11253156 ↗
  • Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8. PubMed 23395245 ↗
  • Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, Lloyd-Sherlock P, Epping-Jordan JE, Peeters GMEEG, Mahanani WR, Thiyagarajan JA, Chatterji S. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2145-2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4. Epub 2015 Oct 29. PubMed 26520231 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data sharing plans have not yet been finalized. Any future sharing of de-identified individual participant data will be considered in accordance with ethical, legal, and institutional requirements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 5,147 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Motor Activity, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 5,207 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 7, 2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
StartActual
May 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07643064
Lead sponsor
Alberto Bermejo Franco
Responsible party
Alberto Bermejo Franco (Principal Investigator, Universidad Europea de Madrid) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
May 28, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Ángel Moisés Reyes Abreu, Registered Nurse
Contact
enf.enlacetacoronte@gmail.com
+34922474058
Alberto Bermejo Franco, PhD (Physiotherapy)
Contact
alberto.bermejo@universidadeuropea.es
+34656932144
Ángel Moisés Reyes Abreu, Registered Nurse
principal investigator · Centro médico Tacoronte. Adress: Carr. Gral. del Nte., 5, 38350 Tacoronte, Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Alberto Bermejo Franco, PhD (Physiotherapy)
study director · Universidad Europea de Madrid. Adress: C/ Tajo, S/N. 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón (Madrid)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion