CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07642323NOR-MPUpdated Jun 11, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of NOM and OPFS Versus RO for dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-Mutated Gastrointestinal Cancers

An observational study in Gastrointestinal Cancers, Gastrointestinal Cancers - Stomach and Gastrointestinal Cancers - Colorectal, sponsored by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
22
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Non-Operative Management (NOM) and Organ Preservation First Strategy (OPFS) compared with Radical Operation (RO) in patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal cancers.

Background \& Design:

With the remarkable efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal tumors, organ preservation has become a promising alternative to highly invasive surgeries. The NOR-MP trial is a single-center, bidirectional registry study consisting of two parts: a retrospective cohort study and a prospective observational registry.

Intervention Group (NOM/OPFS): Patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) or near-cCR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy will undergo a "Watch \& Wait" (W\&W) strategy. Patients with near-cCR or non-cCR who are eligible for organ preservation will undergo local excision (LE) or endoscopic resection (including ESD or EMR).

Comparison Group (Radical Operation): Patients who undergo standard radical surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

The study aims to determine whether an organ-preserving approach can achieve comparable oncological outcomes and safety profiles while significantly improving patients' quality of life compared to radical surgery.

Read the detailed description

The NOR-MP trial is a single-center, bidirectional registry study designed to compare the clinical outcomes of Organ Preservation First Strategy (OPFS) / Non-Operative Management (NOM) against standard Radical Operation (RO) for patients diagnosed with dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal cancers. The study is divided into two sequential parts based on the nature of data collection:

Part 1: Retrospective Cohort Study

This part retrospectively reviews the medical records of eligible patients with dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal cancers who previously completed neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Patients are allocated into two historical cohorts:

Experimental Cohort (NOM/OPFS): Patients who achieved cCR/near-cCR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and entered the "Watch \& Wait" (W\&W) program, as well as those with near-cCR or non-cCR who underwent local excision (LE) or endoscopic resection (including Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [ESD] or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection [EMR]).

Control Cohort (RO): Patients who underwent radical surgical operation after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Pathological outcomes (including the proportions of ypCR, ypTisN0, and ypT1-2N0) and surgical safety data will be collected and analyzed.

Part 2: Prospective Registry Study

This part prospectively enrolls newly diagnosed patients with dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal cancers receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Following treatment evaluation by the multi-disciplinary NOR-MP research team, patients are enrolled into two parallel observational tracks:

Experimental Cohort (NOM/OPFS): Patients eligible for and consenting to NOM or OPFS. This includes the W\&W strategy for those achieving cCR/near-cCR, and LE or endoscopic resection (ESD/EMR) for those with near-cCR or non-cCR.

Control Cohort (RO): Patients who proceed to standard radical operation. Pathological response distribution (proportions of ypCR, ypTisN0, ypT1-2N0, and ypT3+ diseases) and short-to-long-term surgical safety endpoints will be prospectively documented.

By comparing the retrospective and prospective cohorts, this study evaluates whether the omission of radical surgery is oncologically safe and preserves organ function without compromising long-term survival.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrointestinal Cancers
  • Gastrointestinal Cancers - Stomach
  • Gastrointestinal Cancers - Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal Cancers - Anus

Keywords

  • Gastrointestinal cancers
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Gastric cancer
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

779 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 22 is below the median of 197 across 176 observational studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.

Browse Gastrointestinal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute is the lead sponsor of 261 studies on the registry; 128 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The target population consists of adult patients diagnosed with primary gastrointestinal cancers (including but not limited to colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and gastroesophageal junction cancer) that are histologically confirmed as deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) or harboring polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain mutations. All enrolled patients must have received or are scheduled to receive neoadjuvant or conversion immunotherapy prior to definitive local tumor management strategy determination.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed primary gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (e.g., colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer).
  • Confirmed as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) by immunohistochemistry (IHC), high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS), or harboring POLE exonuclease domain mutations.
  • Received neoadjuvant/conversion immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors, either monotherapy or combination therapy) prior to treatment response evaluation.
  • For the Retrospective Cohort (Part 1): Patients treated between [Start Month/Year] and [End Month/Year] who completed evaluation and subsequent strategy (NOM/OPFS or RO).
  • For the Prospective Cohort (Part 2): Newly diagnosed patients who consent to long-term follow-up and multi-disciplinary team (MDT) assessment for organ preservation or radical surgery.
  • Age ≥ 18 years at the time of diagnosis.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrently diagnosed with other active malignant tumors within the past 5 years.
  • Patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) / microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors, or wild-type POLE status.
  • Evidence of untreatable distant metastasis or systemic disease that precludes local tumor management (NOM/OPFS or radical operation).
  • Inability to undergo regular endoscopic, radiological (MRI/CT), or clinical follow-up due to compliance or geographic reasons.
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent form (applicable to the prospective cohort).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
22 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Experimental Cohort (NOM/OPFS)

    Retrospective Cohort Study: Patients who achieved cCR/near-cCR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and entered the "Watch \& Wait" (W\&W) program, as well as those with near-cCR or non-cCR who underwent local excision (LE) or endoscopic resection (including Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection \[ESD\] or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection \[EMR\]). Prospective Registry Study: Patients eligible for and consenting to NOM or OPFS. This includes the W\&W strategy for those achieving cCR/near-cCR, and LE or endoscopic resection (ESD/EMR) for those with near-cCR or non-cCR.

    Other: NOM/OPFS

  • Control Cohort (RO)

    Retrospective Cohort Study: Patients who underwent radical surgical operation after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Pathological outcomes (including the proportions of ypCR, ypTisN0, and ypT1-2N0) and surgical safety data will be collected and analyzed. Prospective Registry Study: Patients who proceed to standard radical operation. Pathological response distribution (proportions of ypCR, ypTisN0, ypT1-2N0, and ypT3+ diseases) and short-to-long-term surgical safety endpoints will be prospectively documented.

Interventions

  • OtherNOM/OPFS

    Patients eligible for and consenting to NOM or OPFS. This includes the W\&W strategy for those achieving cCR/near-cCR, and LE or endoscopic resection (ESD/EMR) for those with near-cCR or non-cCR.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Organ Preservation Rate (for OPFS/NOM group)

    The percentage of patients in the NOM/OPFS group who successfully maintain their native organ without requiring radical surgical resection or permanent stoma.

    Time frame: Up to 3 years after the completion of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical Safety and Postoperative Complications

    Incidence and severity of perioperative complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo classification. This compares the safety data among patients undergoing Radical Operation (RO), Local Excision (LE), or endoscopic resection (ESD/EMR).

    Time frame: Within 30 days and 90 days post-surgery.

  2. Pathological Response Distribution (for RO group)

    Proportions of patients in the radical operation cohort achieving pathological complete response (ypCR), ypTisN0, ypT1-2N0, and ypT3+ diseases to characterize the pathological efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

    Time frame: At the time of radical surgery (typically within 4-12 weeks post-immunotherapy).

  3. Local Regrowth / Recurrence Rate

    Rate of tumor regrowth in patients undergoing the "Watch \& Wait" strategy, or local recurrence in patients undergoing local/endoscopic excision.

    Time frame: Followed up at regular intervals (every 3-6 months) up to 3 years.

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    Defined as the time from treatment initiation to death from any cause.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years.

  5. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) / Disease-Specific Survival (DSS)

    To compare the long-term oncological efficacy between the NOM/OPFS group and the RO group. DFS is defined as the time from the start of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to the date of first documentation of disease recurrence (local, regional, or distant), progression, or death from any cause.

    Time frame: From enrollment/treatment initiation up to 5 years.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07642323
Lead sponsor
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Responsible party
Xiaokang Lei (Dr., Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Xiaokang Lei, M.D.
Contact
lxkpku@163.com
+8618811181993

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion