ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07641699DCM-RBUpdated Jun 11, 2026

A Multicenter Registry-Based Study Across the Spectrum of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

An observational study in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Non-myelopathic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression and Asymptomatic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression, sponsored by Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational registry-based study of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) across the full disease spectrum, linked to a disease-specific biobank. The study will enroll adults with non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression, including asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression with or without radiculopathy, as well as patients with mild, moderate, or severe DCM. The study does not assign treatment or interfere with real-world clinical decision-making. All participants will undergo standardized baseline assessment, scheduled follow-up, and event-driven supplemental data collection. Core data include demographic information, comorbidities, disease characteristics, neurological examination, objective functional tests, patient-reported outcomes, cervical MRI findings, treatment pathway, treatment changes, adverse events, and long-term clinical outcomes. In participating centers, standardized biospecimen collection will be performed to support nested biomarker, immune, imaging, electrophysiological, and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome substudies. The main objective is to establish a standardized multicenter registry platform covering non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression and mild, moderate, and severe DCM; to describe clinical trajectories, imaging evolution, treatment pathways, and long-term outcomes; and to identify factors associated with disease deterioration and functional prognosis.

Read the detailed description

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is an important cause of chronic spinal cord dysfunction in adults. The disease spectrum includes non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression, which may occur with or without radiculopathy, and clinically established mild, moderate, or severe DCM. Current clinical management and research increasingly require standardized longitudinal data collection across different disease stages, treatment pathways, imaging phenotypes, and functional states.

This study will establish a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational registry based on a disease-specific registry platform and linked biobank. The study itself will not interfere with clinical treatment decisions. Participants will receive routine clinical care under real-world practice, including observation, nonsurgical treatment, surgery, or follow-up after previous cervical spine surgery as clinically indicated.

All enrolled participants will enter the same registry platform and undergo standardized baseline assessment, scheduled follow-up, and event-driven supplemental data collection. The registry will use a two-level data structure consisting of a core dataset and optional extended datasets. The core dataset includes demographic characteristics, comorbidities, disease history, neurological examination, objective functional tests, mJOA, JOA, Nurick grade, Neck Disability Index, SF-36v2, cervical MRI findings, treatment exposure, treatment changes, hospitalization, surgery, readmission, reoperation, adverse events, and major functional events.

Extended datasets may include quantitative MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, T2 mapping, electrophysiology, standardized blood biomarkers, PBMC-based immune profiling, omics assays, optional surgically obtained tissue, and structured traditional Chinese medicine syndrome assessment, depending on center capability, ethical approval, funding, and assay validation. The recommended core MRI protocol includes conventional cervical MRI, DTI, and T2 mapping. The core blood collection protocol includes serum, EDTA plasma, buffy coat, and whole blood for biomarker assays and correction variables.

Scheduled follow-up visits are planned at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months, with extension to 60 months when feasible. Event-driven supplemental data collection will be performed when participants develop new myelopathic signs, clinically meaningful neurological deterioration, treatment escalation, surgery, readmission, reoperation, or other major functional events.

The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of clinical deterioration or disease progression across the spectrum of degenerative cervical cord compression and DCM. The registry will support natural history research, clinical trajectory analysis, treatment pathway evaluation, biomarker exploration, nested prognostic modeling, and real-world outcome evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
  • Non-myelopathic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression
  • Asymptomatic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression
  • Cervical Spinal Cord Compression

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Degenerative cervical myelopathy
  • DCM
  • Non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression
  • NMDCCC
  • Asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression
  • ADCC
  • Cervical spinal cord compression
  • Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
  • Patient registry
  • Biobank
  • Natural history
  • Disease progression
  • mJOA
  • Cervical MRI
  • Diffusion tensor imaging
  • T2 mapping
  • Blood biomarker
  • Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome
03

In context

Disease Progression

402 studies on the registry are indexed under Disease Progression; 112 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 200 across 213 observational studies indexed under Disease Progression.

Browse Disease Progression studies →

Lead sponsor

Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults with MRI-confirmed degenerative cervical spinal cord compression caused by degenerative pathology will be enrolled from spine outpatient clinics, inpatient wards, preoperative assessment pathways, postoperative follow-up, and imaging review pathways. The study population includes non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression, with or without radiculopathy, and clinically and radiologically confirmed mild, moderate, or severe degenerative cervical myelopathy. All participants must be able to complete baseline core assessments, provide written informed consent, and participate in longitudinal follow-up.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Cervical MRI confirms cervical spinal cord compression caused by degenerative pathology, including but not limited to disc protrusion or bulging, osteophyte formation, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy or ossification, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, degenerative cervical canal stenosis, or other degenerative compressive factors.
  • At least one cervical level meets one or more of the following imaging criteria: partial or complete disappearance of the cerebrospinal fluid space around the spinal cord, direct contact between the spinal cord and degenerative compressive structures, focal spinal cord indentation, flattening or deformation, or other recognized imaging manifestations of degenerative cervical cord compression.
  • Meets one of the following clinical phenotypes: non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression, with or without clinical radiculopathy; or clinically and radiologically confirmed mild, moderate, or severe degenerative cervical myelopathy.
  • Able to complete baseline core assessments and willing to participate in longitudinal follow-up.
  • Provides written . Additional consent may be obtained for specific biospecimen types or nested substudies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical spinal cord compression or myelopathy mainly caused by non-degenerative etiologies, such as acute trauma, tumor, infection, inflammatory or demyelinating disease, vascular lesion, obvious congenital malformation, or other non-degenerative spinal cord disease.
  • Presence of a dominant other neurological disease or severe psychiatric or cognitive disorder that, in the investigator's judgment, would clearly interfere with DCM-related neurological functional assessment or make reliable follow-up impossible.
  • Objective inability to complete the core imaging assessment or core follow-up and judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for inclusion in the main registry cohort.
  • Refusal to sign or explicit refusal of core data collection and follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
36 Months
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • A1: Non-myelopathic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression Without Radiculopathy

    Adults with MRI-confirmed non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression without clinical radiculopathy.

    Other: Registry-based observation

  • A2: Non-myelopathic Degenerative Cervical Cord Compression With Radiculopathy

    Adults with MRI-confirmed non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression with clinical radiculopathy.

    Other: Registry-based observation

  • B1: Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

    Adults with clinically and radiologically confirmed degenerative cervical myelopathy with mild neurological impairment, defined as mJOA score 15-17.

    Other: Registry-based observation

  • B2: Moderate Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

    Adults with clinically and radiologically confirmed degenerative cervical myelopathy with moderate neurological impairment, defined as mJOA score 12-14.

    Other: Registry-based observation

  • B3: Severe Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

    Adults with clinically and radiologically confirmed degenerative cervical myelopathy with severe neurological impairment, defined as mJOA score 0-11.

    Other: Registry-based observation

Interventions

  • OtherRegistry-based observation

    Participants will receive routine clinical care according to real-world clinical decision-making. The study does not assign or mandate surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Clinical data, imaging data, follow-up outcomes, adverse events, and biospecimens will be collected according to the registry protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Composite Clinical Deterioration or Disease Progression Event

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of any component of the predefined composite clinical deterioration or disease progression endpoint. The composite endpoint is considered to have occurred when a participant first experiences one or more of the following events: progression from non-myelopathic degenerative cervical cord compression to clinical degenerative cervical myelopathy, a decrease in mJOA score of at least 2 points from baseline; a new clinically meaningful neurological deficit or definite myelopathic sign; predefined worsening in symptom/function state; treatment escalation due to objective disease progression; new sphincter dysfunction; loss of independent ambulation; or another major functional event adjudicated by investigators. Participants without any component event will be censored at the last available follow-up. The unit of measure is months from baseline to the first composite event.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Treatment Pathway Conversion

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first treatment pathway conversion. Treatment pathway conversion is defined as a change from observation or regular follow-up to nonsurgical treatment, from observation or nonsurgical treatment to surgery, or another clinically justified treatment strategy change due to symptom worsening, neurological deterioration, imaging progression, or other objective disease progression. Participants without treatment pathway conversion will be censored at the last available follow-up. The unit of measure is months from baseline to first treatment pathway conversion.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

  2. Time to First Cervical Spine Surgery During Follow-up

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first cervical spine surgery related to degenerative cervical cord compression or degenerative cervical myelopathy during follow-up. Cervical spine surgery includes cervical decompression, fusion, laminoplasty, or other DCM-related cervical surgical procedures. Participants without cervical spine surgery will be censored at the last available follow-up. The unit of measure is months from baseline to first cervical spine surgery.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

  3. Time to First DCM-related Readmission

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first readmission related to degenerative cervical myelopathy, degenerative cervical cord compression, postoperative complications, disease recurrence, symptom aggravation, or other cervical spine-related causes. Participants without DCM-related readmission will be censored at the last available follow-up. The unit of measure is months from baseline to first DCM-related readmission.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

  4. Time to First Cervical Spine Reoperation or Additional Cervical Intervention

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first cervical spine reoperation or additional cervical intervention related to degenerative cervical myelopathy, degenerative cervical cord compression, postoperative complications, disease recurrence, adjacent segment problems, or other cervical spine-related causes. Participants without reoperation or additional cervical intervention will be censored at the last available follow-up. The unit of measure is months from baseline to first reoperation or additional cervical intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

  5. Time to First Composite Major Functional Deterioration Event

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first occurrence of any component of the predefined composite major functional deterioration endpoint. The composite endpoint is considered to have occurred when a participant first experiences new or obviously worsened sphincter dysfunction, loss of independent ambulation, serious fall-related consequences, marked decline in activities of daily living, or another clinically meaningful major functional deterioration event adjudicated by investigators. Participants without any component event will be censored at the last available follow-up. The unit of measure is months from baseline to first composite major functional deterioration event.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

  6. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    This outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants who experience at least one serious adverse event during follow-up. Serious adverse events include events resulting in death, life-threatening events, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, persistent or significant disability, or other medically important events. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

  7. Percentage of Surgically Treated Participants With Surgical Adverse Events

    This outcome will be reported as the percentage of surgically treated participants who experience at least one surgical adverse event. Surgical adverse events may be recorded using SAVES-V2 or an equivalent structured adverse event recording tool when feasible. The unit of measure is percentage of surgically treated participants.

    Time frame: From surgery to 36 months after baseline

  8. Percentage of Participants With All-Cause Mortality

    This outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants who die from any cause during follow-up. The date of death and main cause of death will be recorded when available. The unit of measure is the percentage of participants.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in mJOA Score

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at each scheduled follow-up visit. The mJOA score is a clinician-administered neurological function scale for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The unit of measure is points on the mJOA scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  2. Change From Baseline in JOA Score

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at each scheduled follow-up visit. The unit of measure is points on the JOA scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  3. Change From Baseline in Nurick Grade

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in Nurick grade at each scheduled follow-up visit. The Nurick grade is an ordinal clinician-rated measure of gait-related functional impairment in cervical myelopathy. The unit of measure is grade on the Nurick scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  4. Change From Baseline in Neck Disability Index Score

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in the Neck Disability Index score at each scheduled follow-up visit. The Neck Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire assessing neck-related disability. The unit of measure is points on the Neck Disability Index scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  5. Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary Score

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary score at each scheduled follow-up visit. The SF-36v2 is a patient-reported health-related quality of life questionnaire. The unit of measure is points on the SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  6. Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in the SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary score at each scheduled follow-up visit. The SF-36v2 is a patient-reported health-related quality of life questionnaire. The unit of measure is points on the SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  7. Change From Baseline in 10-Second Grip-and-Release Test Count

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in the number of grip-and-release cycles completed within 10 seconds at each scheduled follow-up visit. The 10-second grip-and-release test is an objective hand function test. The unit of measure is the number of cycles.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  8. Change From Baseline in 10-Meter Walking Speed

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in walking speed measured by the 10-meter walking test at each scheduled follow-up visit. The unit of measure is meters per second.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months, or according to clinical follow-up availability

  9. Change From Baseline in Maximum Spinal Cord Compression

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in maximum spinal cord compression measured on cervical MRI. Maximum spinal cord compression will be assessed using offline quantitative MRI measurement. The unit of measure is percentage.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  10. Change From Baseline in Maximum Canal Compromise

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in maximum canal compromise measured on cervical MRI. Maximum canal compromise will be assessed using offline quantitative MRI measurement. The unit of measure is percentage.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  11. Change From Baseline in Spinal Cord Cross-Sectional Area

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in spinal cord cross-sectional area measured on cervical MRI at the target compression level. The unit of measure is square millimeters.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months, when available

  12. Change From Baseline in DTI Fractional Anisotropy

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in fractional anisotropy measured by cervical spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging at the target level or predefined region of interest. The unit of measure is fractional anisotropy value.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  13. Change From Baseline in T2 Mapping Value

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in cervical spinal cord T2 mapping value measured at the target level or predefined region of interest. The unit of measure is milliseconds.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  14. Change From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in plasma neurofilament light chain concentration measured in EDTA plasma. The measurement tool is a blood biomarker assay. The unit of measure is picograms per milliliter.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  15. Change From Baseline in Serum Interleukin-6 Concentration

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in serum interleukin-6 concentration measured in serum. The measurement tool is a blood biomarker assay. The unit of measure is picograms per milliliter.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  16. Change From Baseline in Plasma Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Concentration

    This outcome will be reported as the change from baseline in plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration measured in EDTA plasma. The measurement tool is a blood biomarker assay. The unit of measure is picograms per milliliter.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months

  17. Time to First Worsening in Symptom and Functional State Category

    This outcome will be reported as the time from baseline to the first worsening in the predefined symptom and functional state category. Symptom and functional state will be classified by investigators using a predefined ordinal state category: S0, imaging compression without definite symptoms or signs; S1, radiculopathy-dominant state; S2, sensory-dominant state; S3, upper-limb motor or hand-function dominant state; S4, lower-limb or gait-dominant state; S5, mixed motor involvement; and S6, sphincter dysfunction or severe functional impairment. "Worsening" is defined as a transition to a higher severity state category. The unit of measure is months from baseline to the first worsening in the state category.

    Time frame: Baseline to 36 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100102, China
    • Yin He · Contactmilkywaymoon@163.com · +8615901123675
    • Liguo Zhu · Principal investigator
    • He Yin · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Dusek L, Novotny O, Surelova D, Urbanek I, Prokes B. Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2260-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142434.02579.84. PubMed 15480138 ↗
  • Yanez Touzet A, Bhatti A, Dohle E, Bhatti F, Lee KS, Furlan JC, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS, Zipser CM, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Milligan J, Sarewitz E, Curt A, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Aarabi B, Boerger TF, Tetreault L, Chen R, Guest JD, Kalsi-Ryan S, McNair AG, Kotter M, Davies B; AO Spine RECODE-DCM Steering Committee. Clinical outcome measures and their evidence base in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review to inform a core measurement set (AO Spine RECODE-DCM). BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):e057650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057650. PubMed 35046007 ↗
  • Davies BM, Yang X, Khan DZ, Mowforth OD, Touzet AY, Nouri A, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Kurpad SN, Guest JD, Tetreault L, Kwon BK, Boerger TF, Rodrigues-Pinto R, Furlan JC, Chen R, Zipser CM, Curt A, Milligan J, Kalsi-Rayn S, Sarewitz E, Sadler I, Blizzard T, Treanor C, Anderson D, Fallah N, Hazenbiller O, Salzman C, Zimmerman Z, Wandycz AM, Widdop S, Reeves M, Raine R, Ryan SK, Malone A, Gharooni A, Wilson JR, Martin AR, Fehlings MG, McNair AGK, Kotter MRN; AO SPINE RECODE-DCM Steering Committee and AO Spine RECODE DCM Community. A minimum data set-Core outcome set, core data elements, and core measurement set-For degenerative cervical myelopathy research (AO Spine RECODE DCM): A consensus study. PLoS Med. 2024 Aug 22;21(8):e1004447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004447. eCollection 2024 Aug. PubMed 39173109 ↗
  • Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, Middleton JW, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, Brodke DS, Burns AS, Carette S, Chen R, Chiba K, Dettori JR, Furlan JC, Harrop JS, Holly LT, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kotter M, Kwon BK, Martin AR, Milligan J, Nakashima H, Nagoshi N, Rhee J, Singh A, Skelly AC, Sodhi S, Wilson JR, Yee A, Wang JC. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression. Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):70S-83S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701914. Epub 2017 Sep 5. PubMed 29164035 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The individual participant data sharing plan has not yet been finalized. De-identified data may be made available for ethically approved collaborative research after completion of the main analyses, subject to institutional policies, ethics approval, data use agreements, and applicable regulations. Biospecimen access and transfer will require additional approval according to the biobank governance policy, ethics approval, sample management standard operating procedures, and material transfer agreements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Dec 2031, 66 months later.

Of 103 non-industry observational studies under Disease Progression, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 153. This study's planned 66 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 108 studies reached it within 68 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 153.

Disease Progression covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 30, 2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2031
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2031
Last update
Jun 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07641699
Lead sponsor
Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

He Yin
Contact
milkywaymoon@163.com
+8615901123675
Bo Xu
Contact
xb202212@163.com
+8615537762669
Liguo Zhu
study chair · Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
He Yin
study director · Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion