CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07638553ERPPADUpdated Jul 1, 2026

Efficacy in Relapse Prevention: Psilocybin in Alcohol Use Disorder With Depressive Symptoms

A Phase 3 interventional study of Psilocybin (high dose) and Psilocybin (low dose) in Alcohol Use Disorder, Depressive Sympotoms and Psilocybin, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Recruiting at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
172
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Up to 40% of individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) experience depression, which increases the risk of early relapse. Depression can cause relapse to occur 3 times faster in individuals with AUD who experience depressive symptoms at discharge. No treatments have been approved for individuals with both AUD and depression. Psilocybin, a psychedelic, shows promising results in treating both depression and addiction. It may be particularly effective for preventing relapse in people with AUD who also have depressive symptoms after detoxification, offering quicker action than traditional antidepressants.

The Psilocybin Alcohol Depression (PAD) pilot study, launched in February 2024, has provided critical insights for avoiding methodological flaws and demonstrated that psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) is both feasible and acceptable. Preliminary efficacy analyses were conducted: at 12 weeks, the 25 mg group showed significantly greater reductions in drinking days (p = 0.038) and craving frequency (p = 0.045). Relapse rates were 35% in the 25 mg group and 50% in the control group (HR = 0.52 [0.16-1.65]). In the ERPPAD trial, the study authors will compare high-dose PAP with low-dose PAP in preventing relapse in individuals with AUD and depressive symptoms. The hypothesis is that high-dose PAP will be more effective than low-dose in preventing relapse over 6 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder
  • Depressive Sympotoms
  • Psilocybin

Browse trials for

03

In context

Alcoholism

1,606 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 329 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 172 is above the median of 87 across 1,371 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 587 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed DSM-5 diagnosis of severe AUD.
  • Scale BDI-II ((Beck Depression Inventory) ≥14
  • The last drink must have been consumed between day(D) -60 and D -10 at the inclusion visit. The patient must have had at least 1 HDD during the last drinking period NB: The last drinking period before inclusion is defined by the last 4 weeks counted from the last drink.
  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is participating in an interventional study, a clinical trial, or a clinical investigation or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • Patient unable to give informed consent.
  • Participants planning to donate sperm within three months of psilocybin administration
  • Positive pregnancy test at inclusion for participants of childbearing age.
  • Patient who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or wishing to become pregnant during participation in the study.
  • Any use of classical psychedelic in the last year
  • Other current substance use disorder (except tobacco)
  • Diagnosed schizophrenic or bipolar disorder
  • High emotional lability (clinician-judged)
  • On antipsychotics treatment that may interfere with psilocybin.
  • Need for monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) treatment, which may interfere with psilocybin.
  • Severe suicidal ideation (high risk on the Columbia scale)
  • 1st degree family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder
  • Severe cognitive impairment (clinician-judged)
  • CIWA-AR > 8
  • Medical conditions that would preclude safe participation in the trial, for example: seizure disorders; significant impairment of hepatic function; coronary artery disease; history of arrhythmia; Abnormal QT interval prolongation (QTc > 470 ms for women and >450 ms for men); heart failure; uncontrolled hypertension (greater than 165/95 mmHg at screening); history of stroke; severe asthma; hyperthyroidism; narrow-angle glaucoma; stenosing gastroduodenal ulcer; pyloroduodenal obstruction; symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction; uncontrolled type I or type II diabetes, or a history of ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic coma, or severe hypoglycemia with loss of consciousness.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
172 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High dose psilocybin

    2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart

    Drug: Psilocybin (high dose)

  • Placebo comparator
    Low-dose psilocybin

    2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart

    Drug: Psilocybin (low dose)

Interventions

  • DrugPsilocybin (high dose)

    2 administrations of high-dose psilocybin (25 mg) 3 weeks apart

  • DrugPsilocybin (low dose)

    2 administrations of low-dose psilocybin (3 mg) 3 weeks apart

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of relapse between groups

    Relapse Yes/no, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: Month 6

  2. Time to relapse between groups

    Days until relapse, where relapse is defined as the 1st heavy drinking day, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in relapse rate between groups

    Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  2. Change in rate of heavy drinking days between groups

    Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  3. Change in total alcohol consumption between groups

    Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  4. Change in number of drinking days between groups

    Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  5. Change in craving between groups

    Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving.

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  6. Change in alcohol-related quality of life between groups

    Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control.

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  7. Change in anxiety between groups

    Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  8. Change in emotional dysregulation between groups

    Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  9. Change in rejection sensitivity between groups

    Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ)

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  10. Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups

    Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD

    Time frame: At weeks 3, 9, 15, 21, 27 compared to baseline

  11. Visual Perspective task (VPT)

    This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias

    Time frame: Day 0

  12. Visual Perspective task (VPT)

    This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias

    Time frame: Week 3

  13. Visual Perspective task (VPT) for participants opting for a third dose

    This task allows calculation of the egocentric bias index, the altercentric bias index and the egocentric egocentric bias

    Time frame: Week 28

  14. Request for a 3rd dose of psilocybin between groups

    Yes/no

    Time frame: Week 27

  15. Reason for 3rd dose request

    Relapse in AUD/ risk of relapse in AUD/low self-efficacy/ relapse in depression/ personal development/ other

    Time frame: Week 27

  16. Administration of 3rd dose

    Yes/no

    Time frame: Week 28

  17. Relapse rate in relapsers between groups

    Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  18. Rate of heavy drinking days in relapsers between groups

    Percent; Assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  19. Total alcohol consumption in relapsers between groups

    Grams, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  20. Change in number of drinking days in relapsers between groups

    Days, assessed using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  21. Change in craving in relapsers between groups

    Assessed using the Craving Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), measuring strength and frequency of craving with a score ranging from 0 to 110, whereby a higher score denotes more craving.

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  22. Change in alcohol-related quality of life in relapsers between groups

    Alcohol Quality of Life Scale- brief, a 7-item questionnaire assessing the negative impact of alcohol across 7 dimensions: social relationships, activities, living conditions, self-care, negative emotions, sleep, and loss of control.

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  23. Change in depressive symptoms in relapsers between groups

    Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). The total score is the sum of the 21 item scores, ranging from 0 to 39. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  24. Change in anxiety in relapsers between groups

    Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  25. Change in emotional dysregulation in relapsers between groups

    Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), a 36-item questionnaire

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  26. Change in rejection sensitivity in relapsers between groups

    Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (A-RSQ)

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  27. Change in post-Traumatic Stress Disorder between groups

    Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), where a score of 44 is highly sensitive to diagnose PTSD

    Time frame: At weeks 33, 39, 45, 51 compared to week 27

  28. Adverse Childhood Experiences

    The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 0

  29. Attachment style

    The Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ) for attachment style (secure, fearful, preoccupied, dismissing)

    Time frame: Day 0

  30. Severity of aocohol use disorder

    The Clinical Global Impression- Severity (CGI-S)

    Time frame: Day 0

  31. Cognitive impairments

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Time frame: Day 0

  32. Features of the psychedelic experience

    Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)

    Time frame: Prior to integration session in Week 0

  33. Features of the psychedelic experience

    Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)

    Time frame: Prior to integration session in Week 3

  34. Features of the psychedelic experience

    Acceptance/Avoidance Promoting Experience Questionnaire (APEQ)

    Time frame: Prior to integration session in Week 28 if third dose

  35. Age

    years

    Time frame: Day 0

  36. Sex

    Time frame: Day 0

  37. Currently under antidepressant at the inclusion

    Yes/no

    Time frame: Day 0

  38. Diagnosed with ADHD

    Yes/no

    Time frame: Day 0

  39. In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration

    Time frame: Dosing session in week 0

  40. In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration

    Time frame: Dosing session in week 3

  41. In menstruating participants, point of the menstruation cycle at psilocybin administration

    Time frame: Dosing session in week 28 if third dose

  42. Safety and tolerance of psilocybin

    List of adverse events

    Time frame: End of study, week 51

  43. Change in gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) between groups and subgroups

    fL

    Time frame: At week 28 compared to baseline

  44. Change in carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) between groups and subgroups

    U/L

    Time frame: At week 28 compared to baseline

  45. Change in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) between groups and subgroups

    Percentage

    Time frame: At week 28 compared to baseline

  46. Guess the group

    Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework

    Time frame: After dosing session Week 0

  47. Guess the group

    Two-item questionnaire developed from the EPIsoDE framework

    Time frame: After dosing session Week 3

07

Study locations

1 of 8 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07638553
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2026
Start date
Jun 30, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Amandine Luquiens
Contact
amandine.luquiens@chu-nimes.fr
04.66.68.69.98
Amandine Luquiens
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion