A Phase 2 interventional study of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 at a diagnostic activity of 15 MBq/kg in Digital Osteoarthritis or Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Centre Jean Perrin. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.
Sponsored by Centre Jean Perrin · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study is a phase Ii clinical trial aimed to evaluate the performance of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 to identify a pathological hand joint in each group ; digital osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis
RA Group:
Group DOA:
Exclusion Criteria:
RA Group:
99mTc-NTP 15-5 at a diagnostic activity of 15 MBq/kg
Drug: 99mTc-NTP 15-5 at a diagnostic activity of 15 MBq/kg
99mTc-NTP 15-5 at a diagnostic activity of 15 MBq/kg
Drug: 99mTc-NTP 15-5 at a diagnostic activity of 15 MBq/kg
1 intravenous injection of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 at a diagnostic activity of 15 MBq/kg (D0)
to evaluate the performance of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 to identify a pathological hand joint in each group: digital osteoarthritis (DOA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
The diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 imaging in detecting an abnormal joint among the 15 joints of the hands. The scintigraphic analysis of the joints will be visual, blinded to the pathology, and binary in nature. A joint will be considered pathological on 99mTc-NTP 15-5 in the event of abnormal tracer uptake, compared to joints with physiological uptake. The diagnosis of a pathological joint (gold standard) will be based on a composite radiological-clinical analysis.
Time frame: 2 hour after injection
to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 for differential diagnosis between DAO and RA.
Performance measures of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 imaging for distinguishing between DAO and RA. Readers will classify the scintigrams as DAO or RA based on the uptake pattern. A consensus will be sought in cases of disagreement. The gold standard will be the diagnosis determined by radioclinical analysis.
Time frame: 2 hours after injection of 99mTc-NTP 15-5
to evaluate the performance of 99mTc-NTP imaging 15-5 by joint group in each pathology.
Performance measures of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 imaging to detect an affected joint complex
Time frame: 2 hours after injection
to determine the prevalence of joint damage by pathology according to the scintigraphic method and the radioclinical method
The proportion of joints classified as pathological, according to the scintigraphic method and the radioclinical method
Time frame: 2 hours after injection
To quantitatively analyze the fixation of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 on the hand joints, in each pathology.
measurements of the joint/radial diaphysis ration (99mTc-NTP 15-5A/D), determined by semi-automatic contouring joint interfaces on tomoscintigraphic images and manually traced spherical region of interest on radial diaphyses.
Time frame: 2 hours after injection
to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of visual and quantitative readings
Inter-observer reproducibility measures: Cohen's kappa coefficient for visual readings (before to consensus) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for quantitative readings.
Time frame: 2 hours after injection
to describe the fixation of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 on skeletal joints other than hand joints, based on visual analysis.
All skeletal joints other than the hands will be rated by a score : 0: no fixation, 1: fixation \< adjacent diaphysis, 2: fixation = adjacent diaphysis, 3: fixation \> adjacent diaphysis.
Time frame: 2 hours after injection
to evaluate the tolerance of 99mTc-NTP 15-5.
Adverse events (AEs) assessed according to the NCI-CTCAE V5.0 criteria and associated with 99mTc-NTP 15-5 occurring within the week following the injection.
Time frame: during 1 week after injection of 99mTc-NTP 15-5
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Jean Perrin