ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07616323Updated Jun 1, 2026

Screening LUMBAR Syndrome in Infants With Infantile Hemangiomas

An observational study in LUMBAR Syndrome, sponsored by West China Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-01.

Primary conditionHemangioma, CapillaryRegistry: SyndromeReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Syndrome — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Hemangioma, Capillary
Why
  1. Syndrome describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about.
  2. The study's title name Hemangioma, Capillary.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by West China Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
0 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine the maximal diameter threshold at which infants with lumbosacral, sacrococcygeal, perineal, gluteal, or lower-limb extending infantile hemangiomas should undergo screening for LUMBAR syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Infantile hemangiomas located in the lumbosacral, sacrococcygeal, perineal, gluteal, or lower-limb-extending regions may be associated with LUMBAR syndrome. LUMBAR syndrome refers to a spectrum of regional congenital anomalies associated with lower-body infantile hemangiomas, including lower-body hemangioma, urogenital anomalies, ulceration, myelopathy or spinal dysraphism, bony deformities, anorectal malformations, arterial anomalies, and renal anomalies.

However, the optimal lesion size threshold for initiating systematic screening remains unclear. In current clinical practice, some patients with large or segmental hemangiomas undergo magnetic resonance imaging and systemic evaluation, whereas others with smaller but potentially high-risk lesions may not be screened. Therefore, a clinically practical and evidence-based diameter threshold is needed to guide LUMBAR syndrome screening.

Previous prospective evidence has suggested that lumbosacral infantile hemangiomas larger than 2.5 cm may be associated with a high rate of spinal anomalies. However, whether this 2.5-cm threshold applies to hemangiomas involving the sacrococcygeal, perineal, gluteal, or lower-limb-extending regions remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to prospectively evaluate the relationship between maximal lesion diameter and LUMBAR-associated anomalies and to identify an optimal screening threshold.

02

Conditions studied

  • LUMBAR Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • LUMBAR syndrome
  • screening
  • infantile hemangioma
03

In context

Hemangioma, Capillary Reclassified

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemangioma, Capillary; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 187 across 12 observational studies indexed under Hemangioma, Capillary.

Browse Hemangioma, Capillary studies →

Lead sponsor

West China Hospital is the lead sponsor of 501 studies on the registry; 246 are open to participants now.

Compared within Hemangioma, Capillary, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Syndrome. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of infants clinically diagnosed with infantile hemangioma involving the lower-body region, including the lumbosacral, sacrococcygeal, gluteal, perineal, perianal, external genital, or continuously extending lower-limb areas. Eligible patients will be prospectively and consecutively recruited from participating centers. The target population is selected because infantile hemangiomas in these anatomical regions, particularly large or segmental lesions, may be associated with LUMBAR syndrome or LUMBAR-associated structural anomalies.

Patients with a maximal lesion diameter of ≥2.0 cm will be included in order to allow evaluation of different candidate screening thresholds. The 2.0-cm cutoff will serve as the enrollment threshold rather than the final screening threshold. This design enables comparison of clinically relevant candidate cutoffs, including ≥2.0 cm, ≥2.5 cm, ≥3.0 cm, ≥4.0 cm, and ≥5.0 cm, for predicting LUMBAR-associated anomalies.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinically diagnosed infantile hemangioma.
  2. Lesion located in at least one of the following regions: lumbosacral region, sacrococcygeal region, gluteal region, perineal region, perianal region, external genital region, or continuous extension to the lower limb.
  3. Maximal lesion diameter ≥2.0 cm.
  4. Written obtained from the parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Vascular anomaly other than infantile hemangioma, such as venous malformation, lymphatic malformation, arteriovenous malformation, or congenital hemangioma.
  2. Previously diagnosed genetic or congenital syndrome unrelated to LUMBAR syndrome, which may independently explain the detected anomalies.
  3. Incomplete clinical data preventing accurate measurement of lesion diameter.
  4. Refusal of participation or refusal to complete core screening examinations.
  5. Any condition judged by the investigators to be unsuitable for study participation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • LUMBAR Syndrome

    Diagnostic Test: MRI

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMRI

    Screening for LUMBAR syndrome by MRI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome will be the presence of at least one LUMBAR-associated structural anomaly detected by standardized screening.

    LUMBAR-associated anomalies include spinal or spinal cord anomalies, urogenital anomalies, renal anomalies, anorectal malformations, bony deformities, arterial anomalies, or other regional developmental abnormalities consistent with the LUMBAR spectrum.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Detection rate of spinal or spinal cord anomalies.Detection rate of anorectal, perineal, or urogenital anomalies. Detection rate of arterial or lower-limb developmental anomalies.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Detection rate of renal or urinary tract anomalies.Detection rate of LUMBAR-associated anomalies according to lesion location.Detection rate according to lesion diameter category.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Proportion of patients requiring further specialist treatment or intervention.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Metry D, Fernandez-Faith E, Haggstrom A, Keppler-Noreuil K, Frieden IJ. Segmental Infantile Hemangiomas That Involve the Midline Define Risk for LUMBAR Syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol. 2026 Apr 23. doi: 10.1111/pde.70178. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42021702 ↗
  • Bhatta D, Dev A, Chatterjee D, De D. Extensive Lower Body Infantile Hemangioma With Ulcerations, Spinal and Genitourinary Anomalies: A Case of LUMBAR Syndrome. Int J Dermatol. 2026 Jun;65(6):1300-1302. doi: 10.1111/ijd.70198. Epub 2025 Dec 9. No abstract available. PubMed 41366822 ↗
  • Martin B, Bui JK, Corpin A, Siegel DH, Metry DW. LUMBAR Syndrome State-Of-The-Art Review: Insights Into a Rare and Complex Condition. Pediatr Dermatol. 2025 Nov-Dec;42(6):1117-1125. doi: 10.1111/pde.70024. Epub 2025 Sep 18. PubMed 40963452 ↗
  • Krowchuk DP, Frieden IJ, Mancini AJ, Darrow DH, Blei F, Greene AK, Annam A, Baker CN, Frommelt PC, Hodak A, Pate BM, Pelletier JL, Sandrock D, Weinberg ST, Whelan MA; SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF INFANTILE HEMANGIOMAS. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Infantile Hemangiomas. Pediatrics. 2019 Jan;143(1):e20183475. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3475. PubMed 30584062 ↗
  • Drolet BA, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC, Adams D, Baselga E, Haggstrom AN, Holland KE, Horii KA, Juern A, Lucky AW, Mancini AJ, McCuaig C, Metry DW, Morel KD, Newell BD, Nopper AJ, Powell J, Frieden IJ. Prospective study of spinal anomalies in children with infantile hemangiomas of the lumbosacral skin. J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;157(5):789-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.054. Epub 2010 Sep 9. PubMed 20828712 ↗
  • Metry D, Copp HL, Rialon KL, Iacobas I, Baselga E, Dobyns WB, Drolet B, Frieden IJ, Garzon M, Haggstrom A, Hanson D, Hollenbach L, Keppler-Noreuil KM, Maheshwari M, Siegel DH, Waseem S, Dias M. Delphi Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria for LUMBAR Syndrome. J Pediatr. 2024 Sep;272:114101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114101. Epub 2024 May 15. PubMed 38759778 ↗
  • Iacobas I, Burrows PE, Frieden IJ, Liang MG, Mulliken JB, Mancini AJ, Kramer D, Paller AS, Silverman R, Wagner AM, Metry DW. LUMBAR: association between cutaneous infantile hemangiomas of the lower body and regional congenital anomalies. J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;157(5):795-801.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 Jul 2. PubMed 20598318 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 21, 2026
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Jun 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07616323
Responsible party
Yi Ji (Clinical Professor, West China Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 1, 2026

Study contacts

Yi Ji MD, PhD
Contact
jijiyuanyuan@163.com
86 28 85423453

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion