ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07606963CARE IIUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Triton 1.5 Robotic System for Diagnostic Colonoscopy

An interventional study of Diagnostic Test: Diagnostic Colonoscopy in Colonoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Screening, sponsored by Neptune Medical. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Neptune Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Nov 10, 2026Now CompletedStudy completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, single-site study, focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Triton 1.5 System in diagnostic and basic therapeutic colonoscopy.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective clinical investigation designed to evaluate the safety, and efficacy of the Triton 1.5 System in performing diagnostic, screening, surveillance, and basic therapeutic tasks (e.g., polypectomy for lesions ≤ 2cm). Up to 40 subjects will undergo robotic colonoscopy using the Triton 1.5 System with three operating physicians.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Neptune Medical is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 22 years
  2. Adults indicated for elective screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy
  3. Subject is willing and able to provide written prior to receiving any non-standard of care protocol specific procedures
  4. Subject is willing and able to comply with all protocol required preparation and follow- up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any medical or physical condition/limitation that would contraindicate a conventional colonoscopy. This assessment will be made by the investigator.
  2. Any active or magnetic implantable medical devices (e.g., pacemakers, defibrillators)
  3. Previous failed colonoscopy (except for inadequate bowel preparation)
  4. > 45 kg/m2
  5. Pregnant participants, women of (pre-menopausal and/or no history of hysterectomy), confirmed by a positive pregnancy test (serum).
  6. Surgically altered colonic anatomy
  7. History of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, polyposis syndrome, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch) syndrome, sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis, active diverticulitis in last 6 months or toxic megacolon
  8. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding within 28 days prior to the colonoscopy day
  9. Known bleeding tendency such as hemophilia or coagulation factor deficiencies
  10. Subject receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy apart from low-dose aspirin
  11. Known colonic stricture
  12. Known risk factors for abdominal adhesions such as history of complex abdominal or pelvis surgical procedures, based on investigator assessment
  13. Known abdominal wall hernias
  14. History of radiotherapy to the abdomen or pelvis
  15. History of mesenteric ischemia
  16. Known coronary ischemia or cardiovascular stroke within 3 months prior to the colonoscopy procedure
  17. to the proposed sedation / anesthesia
  18. Received any medicine or treatment within 28 days prior to the colonoscopy procedure
  19. Received or planning to receive any other endoscopic procedure within 4 weeks prior and 2 weeks after the colonoscopy procedure
  20. Participation in any concurrent clinical trial that may impact the results of this study

Intra-Operative Criteria:

  1. Inadequate bowel preparation, defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (Appendix A) score \< 2 in any segment.
  2. Any intraoperative finding or condition that, in the Investigator's judgment, would make study participation unsafe or not in the subject's best interest (e.g., significant stricture, tight sigmoid colon precluding safe overtube passage).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Single Arm

    This study is a prospective, single-arm, non-randomized, single-site study, which is deigned to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Triton 1.5 System for performing diagnostic, screening, surveillance, and basic therapeutic tasks (e.g., polypectomy for lesions ≤2cm) during endoscopic procedures.

    Device: Diagnostic Test: Diagnostic Colonoscopy

Interventions

  • DeviceDiagnostic Test: Diagnostic Colonoscopy

    This study will serve to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Triton 1.5 System for performing diagnostic, screening, surveillance, and basic therapeutic tasks (e.g., polypectomy for lesions ≤2cm).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint - Incident of Major Adverse Events within 48 Hours

    Absence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) within 48 hours of the procedure. MAEs are defined as the following: (a) Device-related death within 48 hours, (b) Perforation within 48 hours, (c) Intraprocedural bleeding preventing completion of the procedure, (d) Delayed bleeding within 48 hours accompanied by predefined symptoms and confirmed by a hemoglobin drop of \>2 g, as applicable, leading to admission to hospital, prolongation of existing hospital stay, another procedure (requiring sedation/anesthesia). Unit of Measure: Number of participants with at least one Major Adverse Event

    Time frame: 48 Hours

  2. Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Successful Completion of Colonoscopy During Procedure

    Completion of colonoscopy defined by both: (a) Successful cecal intubation with visualization of the appendiceal orifice, (b) Successful withdrawal with clinically acceptable diagnostic inspection and therapeutic access.

    Time frame: During Procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Safety Endpoint - Mucosal Injury Score During Procedure

    Mucosal Injury graded using a visual assessment of the colonic wall during withdrawal of the procedure using the following scale: (1) Erythema / Bruising, (2) Mucosal break \< 5 mm, (3) Mucosal break \> 5 mm, (4) Muscle injury (non-full thickness), (5) Full-thickness injury. Unit of Measure: Score (1-5), higher scores indicate more severe injury

    Time frame: During Procedure

  2. Secondary Safety Endpoint - Delayed Bleeding Within 14 Days

    Delayed bleeding within 14 days, defined as: bleeding within 48 hours accompanied by pre-defined symptoms and confirmed by a hemoglobin drop \> 2 g, leading to admission to hospital, prolongation of existing hospital stay, another procedure (requiring sedation/anesthesia).

    Time frame: 14 days post-procedure

  3. Secondary Safety Endpoint - Delayed Perforations Within 14 Days

    Delayed perforations within 14 days, defined as: perforations occurring within 14 days post-procedure.

    Time frame: 14 days post-procedure

  4. Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time to Cecum During Procedure

    Interval from nested-system insertion at the anal verge to first visualization of the appendiceal orifice. Pauses for ancillary or therapeutic tasks (e.g., biopsy, polypectomy ≤ 2 cm, repositioning, prolonged washing) are recorded and subtracted to isolate insertion performance. For polypectomy pauses, time is measured from first polyp visualization to confirmation of retrieval in the specimen trap. Unit of Measure: Minutes or seconds

    Time frame: During Procedure

  5. Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Need for Repositioning During Procedure

    Number of times a participant was repositioned during the procedure. Unit of Measure: Number of repositioning events

    Time frame: During Procedure

  6. Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Polypectomy Success During Procedure

    Clinically acceptable polypectomy performed with cold forceps, cold snare, or hot snare leaving no visible residual polyp. Polyps \> 2 cm or lesions too complex for diagnostic colonoscopy are excluded and deferred for later advanced therapy.

    Time frame: During Procedure

  7. Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) Post-Procedure

    Physician's subjective workload assessment using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), a validated tool consisting of six subscales: Mental Demand, Physical Demand, Temporal Demand, Performance, Effort, and Frustration. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 100 in increments of 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived workload. Unit of Measure: Composite score (0-600)

    Time frame: Immediately after Procedure

  8. Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Adenoma Detection Rate During Procedure

    Percentage of subjects with ≥ 1 histologically confirmed adenoma or carcinoma Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants

    Time frame: During Procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • HT Centrum Medyczne
    Tychy, Silesian Voivodeship 43-100, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Nov 10, 2026
Study completion
Sep 23, 2026→Sep 18, 2026 (actual)
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Study completion Sep 23, 2026→Sep 18, 2026 (now actual)

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07606963
Lead sponsor
Neptune Medical
Collaborators
KCRI, H-T. Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o. sp. k
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 26, 2026
Start date
Aug 24, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 9, 2026
Completion
Sep 18, 2026
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Marcin Romanczyk, MD
principal investigator · H-T Centrum Medyczne

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion