ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07606404FTMH-10Updated Jun 2, 2026

Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: A Comparison of Ten Techniques

An interventional study of Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery and Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Macular Holes, sponsored by Kazakh Eye Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Kazakhstan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by Kazakh Eye Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares ten modern vitreoretinal surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the surgical approaches during pars plana vitrectomy, using stratified randomization based on macular hole size to ensure balanced groups. The main goal is to determine which technique provides the highest anatomical closure rate on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the best visual outcomes. Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery to assess OCT findings, visual acuity, safety outcomes, and the need for reoperation.

Read the detailed description

Full-thickness macular hole is a vision-threatening condition that is commonly treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. While standard approaches achieve high closure rates in many cases, outcomes may vary depending on macular hole size and OCT morphology, and advanced surgical strategies (e.g., different ILM flap configurations, adjunctive biologic augmentation, hydrodissection, or grafting techniques) are increasingly used in clinical practice.

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group interventional study will compare ten PPV-based surgical techniques for full-thickness macular hole repair. Eligible participants will include adults with full-thickness macular hole across a broad range of minimum linear diameter (MLD), including MLD \<250 µm. After eligibility confirmation and informed consent, participants will be randomized to one of the ten procedure groups. Randomization will be stratified by macular hole size into five predefined MLD strata to ensure balanced distribution of hole sizes across all intervention groups. Postoperative care and follow-up procedures will be standardized across groups according to the study protocol.

Follow-up visits are scheduled at Day 7, Month 1, and Year 1 after surgery and will include clinical examinations and OCT imaging. The primary endpoint is anatomical macular hole closure on OCT at the prespecified primary time point. Secondary endpoints include best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT-based morphologic recovery parameters, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, and adverse event information through Year 1. The study aims to generate evidence to guide selection of surgical technique based on macular hole morphometric and clinical characteristics while maintaining patient safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macular Holes

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Full-Thickness Macular Hole
  • Pars Plana Vitrectomy
  • Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
  • Inverted ILM Flap
  • ILM Flap
  • Optical Coherence Tomography
  • Macular Hole Closure
  • Best-Corrected Visual Acuity
  • Platelet-Rich Plasma
  • Amniotic Membrane Graft
  • Macular Hydrodissection
  • Surgical Technique
03

In context

Retinal Perforations

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Perforations; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 50 across 94 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Perforations.

Browse Retinal Perforations studies →

Lead sponsor

Kazakh Eye Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged ≥18 years.

Full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) eligible for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

Symptom duration ≤12 months.

Clear ocular media sufficient for high-quality OCT imaging.

No prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

No severe foveal atrophy on OCT.

Able and willing to comply with postoperative positioning and follow-up visits.

Written provided.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A. Etiology-Related / Secondary Macular Holes:

Traumatic macular hole.

High myopia with posterior staphyloma (axial length >28 mm and/or spherical equivalent ≤-8.0 D).

Diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) or significant tractional maculopathy.

Retinal vascular occlusion-related macular hole.

Uveitis-related macular hole.

Advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with foveal atrophy.

B. Prior Interventions:

Any prior pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye.

C. Ocular Conditions That May Affect Outcomes or Safety:

Active or recent ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., uveitis, endophthalmitis, keratitis).

Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure >28 mmHg despite treatment).

Media opacity precluding adequate OCT (e.g., dense cataract or corneal opacity).

Geographic atrophy involving the fovea.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PPV + PVD Induction Without ILM Peel/Flap

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with induction of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) performed without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and without an ILM flap.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

  • Active comparator
    PPV + ERM peel + circular ILM peel (classic)

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling (if present) followed by standard circular internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling around the fovea (classic technique).

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

  • Active comparator
    PPV + 360° Inverted ILM Flap

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a circumferential (360°) internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap that is inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

  • Active comparator
    PPV + Superior Hinged ILM Flap

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a superior hinged internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap left attached at the superior edge and inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

  • Active comparator
    PPV + Temporal Hinged ILM Flap

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of a temporal hinged internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap, left attached at the temporal edge, and inverted to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

  • Active comparator
    PPV + Multiflap ILM Flap (Cabbage Leaf/Star)

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with creation of multiple small internal limiting membrane (ILM) flaps (multiflap "cabbage leaf/star" technique) positioned to cover the macular hole, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

  • Active comparator
    PPV + ILM removal + inverted flap + PRP

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal and an inverted ILM flap technique. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is applied to the macular hole area as an adjunct, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery · Biological: Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

  • Active comparator
    PPV + ILM removal + PRP

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (no ILM flap technique). Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is applied to the macular hole area as an adjunct, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery · Biological: Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

  • Active comparator
    PPV + ILM Peeling + Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) Graft

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling followed by placement of a human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft for full-thickness macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery · Other: Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) Graft

  • Active comparator
    PPV + Macular Edge Hydrodissection

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with controlled hydrodissection (hydromobilization) of the macular hole edges using balanced salt solution to gently separate and mobilize the retinal margins before macular hole closure, according to the study protocol.

    Procedure: Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedurePars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV)-Based Macular Hole Surgery

    Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for full-thickness macular hole repair performed according to the randomized assigned technique (e.g., ERM peel, ILM peeling, ILM flap configurations, or macular edge hydrodissection), as specified in the protocol.

  • Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied intraoperatively to the macular hole area as an adjunct to surgery, according to the study protocol.

  • OtherHuman Amniotic Membrane (hAM) Graft

    Human amniotic membrane (hAM) graft placed intraoperatively for macular hole repair, according to the study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Macular Hole Closure at 7 days

    Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.

    Time frame: 7 day

  2. Macular Hole Closure at 1month

    Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Macular Hole Closure at 1 Year

    Proportion of participants with OCT-confirmed anatomical macular hole closure.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. BCVA at Day 7

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at Day 7 after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. BCVA at 1 Month

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 month after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. BCVA at 1 Year

    Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured at 1 year after surgery and recorded in logMAR units.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Kazakh Eye Research Institute
    Almaty, Almaty 050042, Kazakhstan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This study does not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) publicly. De-identified aggregated results may be shared in publications and presentations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07606404
Lead sponsor
Kazakh Eye Research Institute
Responsible party
Kairat Ruslanuly (Senior Scientific Researcher, Kazakh Eye Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2026
Start date
May 25, 2026
Primary completion
May 27, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 27, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Sanzhar Sambet, MD
Contact
sanzhrs@gmail.com
+77758719834
Kairat Ruslanuly, MD
Contact
ruslanuly.kairat@gmail.com
+77019008387
Sanzhar Sambet Sambet, MD
principal investigator · Kazakh Eye Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Platelet rich plasma

Start the discussion