An interventional study of MEDBRIDGE-Guided NCM/CHW Post-Discharge Support Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes, Medication Adherence and Care Transition, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.
Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study tests whether a support program led by a nurse case manager and community health worker can help patients with type 2 diabetes manage their medications after leaving the hospital. Many patients with diabetes take multiple medications, and changes to these medications during hospital stays can cause confusion and lead to missed doses or incorrect use. This is especially common in communities with limited access to healthcare.
The study uses a computer-based tool called MEDBRIDGE (MEDication BRIDGE) to identify patients who may be at higher risk for problems after discharge, such as worsening blood sugar control or return visits to the emergency department. Patients identified as high-risk will receive 3 months of support from a nurse case manager and community health worker team, who will help with medication questions, coordinate with their doctor, and provide follow-up check-ins.
The main goal is to find out whether this type of support program is practical to deliver and acceptable to patients. The study will also track changes in blood sugar levels and emergency department visits. Forty-five patients will be enrolled over 6 months at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Cooper Green Mercy Health Services in Jefferson County, Alabama.
This single-arm feasibility pilot evaluates a MEDBRIDGE-guided nurse case manager (NCM) and community health worker (CHW) post-discharge support intervention for high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MEDBRIDGE is an AI-driven risk stratification tool that integrates medication data, clinical factors, and social determinants of health from electronic health records to identify patients at elevated risk of HbA1c elevation, diabetes-related emergency department visits, and hospitalizations within 3 months post-discharge.
The intervention follows a four-phase workflow: (1) Risk Assessment, where the NCM reviews the daily MEDBRIDGE-generated high-risk patient list; (2) Initial Patient Contact, where the NCM/CHW team initiates contact after discharge to review medications and identify discrepancies; (3) Ongoing Support, where the CHW provides monthly check-ins to monitor adherence, address barriers, and coordinate with primary care providers; and (4) Transition to Routine Care, where the team facilitates handoff to the patient's primary care provider with a summary of activities and recommendations.
Primary outcomes include feasibility (recruitment rate, retention rate), patient acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure), and intervention fidelity (NCM/CHW contact log adherence). Secondary outcomes include HbA1c change, diabetes-related emergency department visits, and diabetes-related hospitalizations within 3 months post-discharge, analyzed descriptively and compared with non-intervention high-risk patients identified by MEDBRIDGE.
The study is conducted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hospital and Cooper Green Mercy Health Services, a county-owned safety-net facility serving predominantly low-income and uninsured residents of Jefferson County, Alabama. The patient population is characterized by higher rates of medication complexity, limited health literacy, and social vulnerability. Approximately 20 UAB hospitalizations involve Cooper Green patients with T2D each month, providing a sufficient recruitment base for the target enrollment of 45 patients over a 6-month recruitment window.
10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,421 studies on the registry; 277 are open to participants now.
Of its 164 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 130 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
HbA1c
A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
High-risk patients with type 2 diabetes identified by the MEDBRIDGE risk stratification tool receive a 3-month post-discharge support intervention delivered by a nurse case manager (NCM) and community health worker (CHW) team.
Behavioral: MEDBRIDGE-Guided NCM/CHW Post-Discharge Support Intervention
A 3-month post-discharge care coordination intervention delivered by a nurse case manager (NCM) and community health worker (CHW) team, guided by MEDBRIDGE AI-driven risk stratification. The intervention follows a four-phase workflow: (1) Risk Assessment, where the NCM reviews the daily MEDBRIDGE-generated high-risk patient list; (2) Initial Patient Contact, where the NCM/CHW team initiates contact after discharge to review medications and identify discrepancies; (3) Ongoing Support, where the CHW provides monthly check-ins to monitor adherence, address barriers, and coordinate with primary care providers; and (4) Transition to Routine Care, where the team facilitates handoff to the patient's primary care provider with a summary of activities and recommendations. Participants receive a minimum of 3 contacts over the intervention period.
Recruitment Rate
Number of patient enrollments per month compared against threshold of 6 enrollments per month. Enrollment rate calculated as the percentage of eligible patients (based on MEDBRIDGE recommendations) who enrolled in the intervention (completed first interaction); target 50% or higher.
Time frame: 6-month recruitment window
Retention Rate
Percentage of enrolled patients completing each round of the intervention (first, second, and up to the final round). Target completion rate of 60% or higher. Estimated 85% retention per subsequent interaction, yielding approximately 61% final retention.
Time frame: 3 months post-enrollment
Patient Acceptability
Patient scores on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Target mean score of 4 or higher. Surveys assess comfort with the intervention process and communication with the NCM/CHW team.
Time frame: End of 3-month intervention
Intervention Fidelity
NCM/CHW self-report logs including interaction start and end timestamps and a checklist of core intervention components performed, compared against adherence threshold of 0.85. Bi-weekly supervision sessions review logs to ensure protocol adherence.
Time frame: Throughout 3-month intervention
HbA1c Change
Continuous variable of HbA1c change calculated for each patient using HbA1c self-check at baseline and 3 months. An indicator variable on whether HbA1c reduction exceeds 0.5% will be created. Values descriptively compared with non-intervention high-risk patients identified by MEDBRIDGE.
Time frame: 3 months post-discharge
Diabetes-Related Emergency Department Visits
Count of diabetes-related emergency department visits identified through retrospective EHR data review. Values descriptively compared with non-intervention high-risk patients identified by MEDBRIDGE.
Time frame: 3 months post-discharge
Diabetes-Related Hospitalizations
Count of diabetes-related hospitalizations identified through retrospective EHR data review. Values descriptively compared with non-intervention high-risk patients identified by MEDBRIDGE.
Time frame: 3 months post-discharge
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying published results will be made available upon reasonable request.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form
Time frame: Beginning 12 months after publication of primary results and available for 5 years.
Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and sign a data use agreement. Requests should be directed to the PI (slee9@uab.edu).
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Alabama at Birmingham →