ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07597304PBMT-CANUpdated May 19, 2026

Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) for Accelerating Maxillary Canine Movement Using Two Wavelengths (650 nm and 976 nm): A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

An interventional study of 650 nm Photobiomodulation Therapy and 976 nm Photobiomodulation Therapy in Orthodontic Treatment Acceleration and Photobiomodulation Therapy, sponsored by Kufa University. Completed at 1 site in Iraq. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Kufa University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2025, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

movement using low-level laser therapy with different wavelengths. Participants will receive laser application during orthodontic treatment, and the rate of canine movement will be measured and compared between the study groups. The results may help determine whether low-level laser therapy can accelerate orthodontic tooth movement safely and effectively.

Read the detailed description

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been proposed as a non-invasive adjunctive method to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement and reduce overall treatment duration. This split-mouth randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different laser wavelengths (650 nm and 976 nm) on the acceleration of maxillary canine movement during orthodontic treatment.

Participants requiring bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction and canine retraction as part of their orthodontic treatment will be included. Each patient will serve as their own control using a split-mouth design. One side will receive PBMT application during canine retraction, while the contralateral side will act as the control or receive an alternative wavelength according to the randomization protocol.

Orthodontic canine movement will be performed using standardized orthodontic mechanics under controlled force application. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of maxillary canine movement assessed at regular intervals. Secondary outcomes will include total treatment duration required for space closure and the influence of patient-related factors such as age and gender on treatment outcomes.

The study will compare the clinical effectiveness of 650 nm and 976 nm wavelengths in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Statistical analyses including paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and correlation analyses will be used to evaluate differences between groups and assess associations between demographic variables and treatment response.

The findings of this study may provide clinically relevant evidence regarding the effectiveness of PBMT in reducing orthodontic treatment time and improving treatment efficiency.

02

Conditions studied

  • Orthodontic Treatment Acceleration
  • Photobiomodulation Therapy

Keywords

  • Photobiomodulation Therapy Low-Level Laser Therapy Orthodontics Canine Retraction Orthodontic Tooth Movement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kufa University is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • good oral hygiene and the absence of any medications affecting bone metabolism.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • systemic diseases, periodontal pathology, a history of previous orthodontic treatment, or the use of antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs during the study.[
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    650 nm PBMT

    Participants receive photobiomodulation therapy using a 650 nm laser during maxillary canine retraction.

    Device: 650 nm Photobiomodulation Therapy

  • Experimental
    976 nm PBMT

    Participants receive photobiomodulation therapy using a 976 nm laser during maxillary canine retraction.

    Device: 976 nm Photobiomodulation Therapy

Interventions

  • Device650 nm Photobiomodulation Therapy

    Application of 650 nm low-level laser therapy during maxillary canine retraction to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement.

  • Device976 nm Photobiomodulation Therapy

    Application of 976 nm low-level laser therapy during maxillary canine retraction to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Maxillary Canine Movement

    Measurement of the amount of maxillary canine movement during orthodontic retraction following application of photobiomodulation therapy using 650 nm and 976 nm wavelengths.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation Between Age and Rate of Canine Retraction

    Assessment of the correlation between patient age (years) and rate of maxillary canine retraction measured in millimeters per month using digital caliper measurements on study models.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Difference in Rate of Canine Retraction Between Sexes

    Comparison of the rate of maxillary canine retraction (mm/month) between male and female participants measured using digital caliper measurements on study models.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Orthodontic Clinic, College of Dentistry, University of Kufa
    Najaf, Najaf Governorate 54001, Iraq
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alhumadi A. Gender-related response to different wavelength low-level laser therapy in orthodontic mandibular canine movement: a split-mouth study. Endodontics Today. 2026;24:58-66. doi:10.36377/ET-0159.
  • Al-Kufi HM, Alhumadi A, Huthiafa SM. A comparative evaluation of postoperative re-pigmentation following gingival depigmentation using a 940-nm diode laser and abrasion method: a split-mouth study. Lasers in Dental Science. 2024;8(1):3. doi:10.1007/s41547-023-00208-y.
  • Zheng J, Yang K. Clinical research: low-level laser therapy in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01684-z. PubMed 34182967 ↗
  • Wazwaz F, Seehra J, Carpenter GH, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT. Duration of canine retraction with fixed appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Feb;163(2):154-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Dec 1. PubMed 36464569 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be publicly shared in order to protect participant confidentiality and privacy.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07597304
Lead sponsor
Kufa University
Responsible party
Almustafa Alhumadi (lecturer, Kufa University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
May 5, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 6, 2026
Completion
Mar 20, 2026
Last update
May 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion