ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07590297FPI-6-ESUpdated May 15, 2026

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the FPI-6 in Spain

An observational study in Foot Deformities and Flatfoot, sponsored by Paloma López Ros. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-15.

Primary conditionFlatfootRegistry: Foot DeformitiesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Foot Deformities — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Flatfoot
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Flatfoot, a narrower term within Foot Deformities.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Paloma López Ros · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
6 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Spanish version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6). This clinical tool is widely used to evaluate standing foot posture through six visual criteria. The study aims to provide Spanish-speaking clinicians and researchers with a reliable and valid instrument to assess foot posture in the Spanish population, ensuring that the psychometric properties of the original scale are preserved

Read the detailed description

This study follows a prospective, observational design and will be carried out in two phases:

Phase 1: Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation. Following international standards (forward-backward translation method), the original English FPI-6 will be translated into Spanish by two independent translators. A synthesis version will be created, followed by a back-translation into English to ensure conceptual equivalence. A pilot test will be conducted to ensure the clarity of the items.

Phase 2: Validation and Psychometric Evaluation. The Spanish version of the FPI-6 will be administered to a sample of participants. To evaluate reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability will be calculated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Internal consistency will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity will be analyzed by comparing FPI-6 scores with other validated clinical measures of foot posture

02

Conditions studied

  • Foot Deformities
  • Flatfoot

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Foot Posture Index
  • FPI-6
  • Validation Study
  • Reliability
  • Spanish Version
03

In context

Flatfoot Reclassified

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Flatfoot; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 47 across 48 observational studies indexed under Flatfoot.

Browse Flatfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Paloma López Ros as lead sponsor.

Compared within Flatfoot, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Foot Deformities. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of individuals from the general population in Spain, covering a wide age range that includes children (from 6 years old), adults, and the elderly (up to 89 years). Participants are recruited through convenience sampling from university clinics and local community centers to ensure a diverse representation of foot types (neutral, pronated, and supinated) across different stages of life

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants aged between 6 and 89 years
  • Ability to understand and sign the form. In the case of minors, written informed consent from parents or legal guardians and child's assent (where applicable) are required
  • Ability to maintain a relaxed standing position unassisted for the duration of the clinical assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of major surgery or significant trauma in the lower limbs or feet.
  • Presence of open wounds or active skin infections on the feet at the time of the examination.
  • Neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that severely affect balance or standing posture.
  • Cognitive impairment that prevents the participant from following simple clinical instructions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • General Population (Children and Adults)

    This group includes participants of all ages, including children (from 5 years old) and adults. The study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) across a diverse age range to ensure its validity and reliability in the general Spanish-speaking population

    Other: Spanish version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6)

Interventions

  • OtherSpanish version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6)

    The assessment consists of the clinical application of the Spanish version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6). This is a non-invasive observational method where the investigator evaluates six specific criteria of the foot while the participant stands in a relaxed position. The six criteria include: talar head palpation, supra and infra-malleolar curvature, calcaneal frontal plane position, prominence in the region of the talonavicular joint, congruence of the internal longitudinal arch, and abduction/adduction of the forefoot on the rearfoot. Each item is scored between -2 and +2, providing a total score between -12 and +12

  • OtherSpanish version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6)

    Clinical assessment of standing foot posture using the Spanish translation of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6). This tool evaluates six criteria: talar head palpation, supra and infra-malleolar curvature, calcaneal frontal plane position, prominence in the region of the talonavicular joint, congruence of the internal longitudinal arch, and abduction/adduction of the forefoot on the rearfoot. Each item is scored on a scale from -2 to +2. The tool will be applied to a sample of children (from 5 years old) and adults to evaluate its psychometric properties, including reliability and internal consistency

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of the Spanish FPI-6

    Consistency of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scores evaluated through the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Intra-rater reliability will be assessed by one examiner repeating the test after 1-2 weeks. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed by two examiners evaluating each subject with a one-hour interval.

    Time frame: Baseline and 7-14 days later

  2. Internal Consistency of the Spanish FPI-6

    Measured using Cronbach's alpha to ensure that all six items of the FPI-6 contribute coherently to the total score. A value \> 0.70 is expected.

    Time frame: At Baseline (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Criterion Validity

    Correlation of the Spanish FPI-6 total score with the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale using Spearman's correlation

    Time frame: At Baseline (Day 1)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available. PubMed 11124735 ↗
  • Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Jan;21(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Sep 21. PubMed 16182419 ↗
  • Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the Foot Posture Index. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008 Jul 31;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-6. PubMed 18822155 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07590297
Lead sponsor
Paloma López Ros
Responsible party
Paloma López Ros (Assistant Professor, PhD, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 15, 2026
Start date
May 16, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 15, 2026

Study contacts

Paloma López Ros, PhD
Contact
plopez@umh.es
+34656928127
Jonatan García-Campos, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad Miguel Hernández
Javier Marco-Lledó, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad Miguel Hernández
Vicenta Martínez-Córcoles, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad Miguel Hernández
Roberto Pascual-Gutiérrez, MSc
principal investigator · Universidad Miguel Hernández
Laura Tabernero-Grau, MSc
principal investigator · Universidad Miguel Hernández
David Montoro-Cremades, MSc
principal investigator · Universidad Miguel Hernández
Paloma López Ros, PhD
study director · Universidad Miguel Hernández

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion