ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07588126Updated May 14, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Transgluteal Sciatic Nerve Hydrodissection for the Treatment of Sciatica in the Emergency Department

An interventional study of Ultrasound guided transgluteal sciatic nerve hydrodissection in Sciatica Acute and Sciatica Pain, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-14.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to see whether it would be feasible to treat patients who come to the emergency department with pain related to sciatica using an ultrasound guided injection of dextrose in water solution ("sugar water") into the tissue that surrounds the sciatic nerve in the gluteal region. THe study will looks at a few things:

  • Is the treatment feasible within the setting of the emergency department
  • Is the treatment safe in the short term (up to 72 hours after the injection)
  • Is the treatment good for lowering patients' pain from sciatica in the short term (immediate and up to 72 hours' follow up)
  • How does the treatment compare to current standard medicines given to patients for sciatica in the emergency department in terms of lowering pain

Patients who came to the emergency department and had the injection as part of their care for sciatica will answer some questions about their symptoms during a phone call follow up 72 hours after leaving the emergency department.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sciatica Acute
  • Sciatica Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hydrodissection
  • Ultrasound guided
  • transgluteal sciatic nerve
  • sciatica
  • nerve block
03

In context

Sciatica

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Sciatica; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 69 is close to the median of 68 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Sciatica.

Browse Sciatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Clinically diagnosed acute sciatica, defined as pain and/or paresthesias in a -sciatic nerve distribution
  • Willing to undergo the injection procedure
  • Verbal provided prior to enrollment
  • Adequate sonographic visualization of the sciatic nerve in the transgluteal window confirmed on screening ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fever or signs of systemic infection
  • Suspected spinal infection
  • Suspected spinal
  • Signs or symptoms of cauda equina syndrome
  • Acute traumatic mechanism of pain
  • Localized infection or skin breakdown at the proposed injection site
  • Known allergy to study injectate (5% dextrose in water) or procedural materials
  • Refusal to participate
  • Inability to adequately visualize the target anatomy on ultrasound for safe injection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
69 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Comparison group

    These are patients who received current usual or standard treatment for their sciatic pain, such as oral pills and/or intravenous or intramuscular injections with various medications in the emergency department. These patients are followed contemporaneously as a comparison to the patients who received the hydrodissection injection.

  • Other
    transgluteal sciatic nerve hydrodissection

    These patients received the transgluteal sciatic nerve hydrodissection injection procedure when a study investigator was present to administer it.

    Procedure: Ultrasound guided transgluteal sciatic nerve hydrodissection

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound guided transgluteal sciatic nerve hydrodissection

    Injection of dextrose in water solution (D5W) under ultrasound guidance into the tissue plane that encloses the sciatic nerve between its two neighboring muscles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Successful Transgluteal Sciatic Nerve Hydrodissection (TSNH) Procedure Completion Among Eligible Emergency Department Patients

    Procedural feasibility will be assessed using four metrics: (1) Enrollment rate, measured as proportion of screened patients meeting eligibility criteria who were enrolled; (2) Procedural attempt rate, measured as proportion of enrolled patients in whom TSNH was attempted; (3) Procedural completion rate, measured as proportion of attempted procedures in which successful injection of D5W was achieved on ultrasound visualization; (4) Follow-up completion rate, measured as proportion of enrolled patients completing the 72-hour structured telephone follow-up.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 72-hour follow-up completion

  2. Incidence of Procedure-Related Adverse Events Within 72 Hours Following Transgluteal Sciatic Nerve Hydrodissection (TSNH)

    Incidence of adverse events assessed via structured 72-hour telephone follow-up using a standardized script administered to all patients participants by study the investigators. Adverse events evaluated include: (1) new or worsening motor weakness in the ipsilateral lower extremity; (2) new sensory disturbance in the ipsilateral lower extremity; (3) injection-site pain beyond expected post-procedural soreness; (4) signs or symptoms of injection-site infection. Results reported as number and percentage of participants experiencing each adverse event type.

    Time frame: From time of injection to 72-hour post-discharge telephone follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline to Post-Treatment and 72-Hour Follow-Up

    Change in self-reported pain level measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain (higher scores indicate worse outcome). Scores recorded at three timepoints: (1) baseline, prior to any treatment in the ED; (2) post-treatment, approximately 15 minutes after TSNH procedure completion for the TSNH group, and at a comparable timepoint for the comparison group; (3) 72-hour follow-up, via structured telephone contact after ED discharge. Change from baseline pain level calculated at each timepoint. Pain scores compared between participants receiving TSNH and a contemporaneous comparison group receiving standard pharmacologic care.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 72-hour post-discharge follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaiser Permanente
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Silver D, Esener D, Rose G. Ultrasound guided transgluteal sciatic nerve hydrodissection for the treatment of acute sciatica in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;69:219.e3-219.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.02.026. Epub 2023 Feb 28. PubMed 36933988 ↗
  • Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025. PubMed 28778254 ↗
  • Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):601-610. doi: 10.1002/ana.25332. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PubMed 30187524 ↗
  • Colorado B, McNeill D, Norbury J. Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for Peripheral Entrapment Neuropathies. Muscle Nerve. 2025 Nov;72(5):1052-1059. doi: 10.1002/mus.28471. Epub 2025 Aug 6. PubMed 40766979 ↗
  • Lam KHS, Hung CY, Chiang YP, Onishi K, Su DCJ, Clark TB, Reeves KD. Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for Pain Management: Rationale, Methods, Current Literature, and Theoretical Mechanisms. J Pain Res. 2020 Aug 4;13:1957-1968. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S247208. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32801851 ↗
  • Neo EJR, Shan NT, Tay SS. Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 1;101(6):530-539. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001846. Epub 2021 Jul 14. PubMed 34261895 ↗
  • Macias R, Diaz D, Prats MI. Motor blockade from transgluteal sciatic nerve block in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;60:193-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.029. Epub 2022 Jun 21. No abstract available. PubMed 35760739 ↗
  • Goldsmith AJ, Merz-Herrala J, Gullikson J, Selame LA, Cash RE, Martin D, Driver L, Schwimmer H, Shokoohi H, Duggan NM, Nagdev A. The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transgluteal Sciatic Nerve Blocks for Sciatic Radiculopathy Pain in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Prospective Study. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Apr 10;6(3):100137. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100137. eCollection 2025 Jun. PubMed 40256350 ↗
  • Amini R, Kartchner JZ, Nagdev A, Adhikari S. Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks in Emergency Medicine Practice. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Apr;35(4):731-6. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.05095. Epub 2016 Mar 1. PubMed 26931789 ↗
  • Goldsmith AJ, Brown J, Duggan NM, Finkelberg T, Jowkar N, Stegeman J, Riscinti M, Nagdev A, Amini R. Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in emergency medicine practice: 2022 updates. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;78:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.043. Epub 2024 Jan 12. PubMed 38244244 ↗
  • National Guideline Centre (UK). Evidence review for pharmacological management of sciatica: Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management: Evidence review A. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020 Sep. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562934/ PubMed 33090751 ↗
  • Pinto RZ, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Hancock M, Oliveira VC, McLachlan AJ, Koes B. Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012 Feb 13;344:e497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e497. PubMed 22331277 ↗
  • Roncoroni C, Baillet A, Durand M, Gaudin P, Juvin R. Efficacy and tolerance of systemic steroids in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50(9):1603-11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker151. Epub 2011 Apr 27. PubMed 21525139 ↗
  • Rasmussen-Barr E, Held U, Grooten WJ, Roelofs PD, Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Wertli MM. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 15;10(10):CD012382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012382. PubMed 27743405 ↗
  • Mathieson S, Maher CG, McLachlan AJ, Latimer J, Koes BW, Hancock MJ, Harris I, Day RO, Billot L, Pik J, Jan S, Lin CC. Trial of Pregabalin for Acute and Chronic Sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 23;376(12):1111-1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614292. PubMed 28328324 ↗
  • Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Peul WC. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1313-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39223.428495.BE. No abstract available. PubMed 17585160 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be made available upon reasonable request, contingent upon institutional review and approval. Shared data will include selected variables necessary to reproduce the primary analyses, along with a data dictionary. Requests will require a methodologically sound proposal and execution of a data use agreement to ensure protection of participant confidentiality.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will be available beginning 6 months following publication of the primary results and will remain available for 3 years thereafter.

Access criteria: Access will be granted to qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal. Available materials will include de-identified individual participant data, data dictionary, study protocol, and statistical analysis plan. Requests will be reviewed by the study team and sponsoring institution, and access will require execution of a data use agreement. Data will be provided in a secure, de-identified format via electronic transfer.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07588126
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2026
Start date
Jan 12, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 21, 2025
Completion
Feb 21, 2025
Last update
May 14, 2026

Study contacts

Gabriel Rose
principal investigator · Kaiser Permanente

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion