ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07588074Updated Sep 22, 2026

Tolerability Comparison of Flarex to Lotemax SM

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fluorometholone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension 0.1% and Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel 0.38% in Ocular Inflammation, Keratoconjunctivitis and Dry Eye Disease (DED), sponsored by Harrow Inc. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Harrow Inc · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jun 2021, 5 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 5 years after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2021, registered May 2026).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compared the ocular tolerability of fluorometholone acetate ophthalmic suspension 0.1% (FLAREX) to loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.38% (Lotemax SM) in adult subjects. Each subject received one drop of each product, one in each eye, in a randomized, double-masked design. Comfort, impact on vision, and palpebral conjunctival injection were evaluated at 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after instillation.

Read the detailed description

Background. The use of anti-inflammatory medications is standard practice for managing inflammatory events associated with allergic conjunctivitis, dry eye disease, or post-operative ocular surface inflammation. FLAREX (fluorometholone acetate 0.1%) and Lotemax SM (loteprednol etabonate 0.38%) are both topical corticosteroid ophthalmic products approved for treatment of steroid-responsive ocular surface inflammation.

Objectives. The principal objective was to evaluate the initial comfort and impact on vision of FLAREX versus Lotemax SM. Secondary objectives were palpebral conjunctival injection and corneal staining.

Methods. This was a randomized, single-site, double-masked, controlled study. Each eligible subject received one drop of FLAREX in one eye and one drop of Lotemax SM in the fellow eye, with eye assignment randomized. Study medications were over-labeled "Drop A" and "Drop B" using surgical tape so that the subject and investigator were masked to the medication in each eye; the study coordinator was unmasked and administered the drops out of the subject's view. Subjective and objective measures were captured at three time points: within 30 seconds of instillation, at 5 minutes after instillation, and at 10 minutes after instillation. Adverse events were monitored through 7 days following instillation.

Statistical analysis. A target enrollment of approximately 30 subjects (up to 40) was set; no formal sample size calculation was performed, as the study used approved products in their approved indications with subjective endpoints. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled subjects. The modified ITT (mITT) population included all subjects who completed screening, were eligible, were not treatment failures, and completed all three time-point assessments. The per-protocol (PP) population included mITT subjects compliant with dosing and time-point visits with no significant protocol violations. The primary analysis was performed on the mITT population. Safety analyses were performed on all subjects who received at least one dose. Continuous and ordinal variables were analyzed using parametric methods (t-test, ANOVA, ANCOVA), with descriptive statistics summarizing outcomes at each assessment time point.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ocular Inflammation
  • Keratoconjunctivitis
  • Dry Eye Disease (DED)
  • Post-operative Complications
  • Kerato Conjunctivitis Sicca
  • Dry Eye Syndromes
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • fluorometholone acetate
  • loteprednol etabonate;
  • FLAREX
03

In context

Keratoconjunctivitis

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 45 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis.

Browse Keratoconjunctivitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Harrow Inc is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able and willing to comprehend and follow the requirements of the study
  • Able and willing to provide a signed and dated document and HIPAA authorization
  • Male or female of any race or ethnicity, aged 18 years or older
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Mild to moderate symptoms of ocular surface inflammation associated with allergic conjunctivitis, dry eye disease, or following ocular surgery
  • History of use of topical ocular medications
  • Subjects of who agree to use a medically acceptable form of during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of product

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected alcohol or substance abuse (e.g., amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cocaine, marijuana, opiates)
  • Known sensitivity, allergies, or to any product ingredient
  • Pregnancy
  • Previously screened and determined to be ineligible for the study
  • Use of a therapeutic eye treatment (OTC or prescription) within 2 days of the Screening/Baseline visit
  • Relative, partner, or staff of any clinical research site personnel
  • Active ocular infection of any type at the start of the study (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or positive history of ocular herpetic infection
  • Compromised immune system
  • Chronic systemic inflammatory disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome)
  • Contact lens use within 24 hours prior to Visit 1 and during study participation
  • Use of any new ocular OTC or prescription medications within 24 hours prior to Visit 1 and throughout study participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FLAREX (randomized eye)

    Each subject received one drop of fluorometholone acetate ophthalmic suspension 0.1% (FLAREX) in one eye on Day 1. The eye receiving FLAREX was assigned by randomization. The fellow eye received Lotemax SM (see Arm 2).

    Drug: Fluorometholone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension 0.1%

  • Active comparator
    Lotemax SM (fellow eye)

    Each subject received one drop of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.38% (Lotemax SM) in the eye opposite to the FLAREX-randomized eye, on the same day.

    Drug: Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel 0.38%

Interventions

  • DrugFluorometholone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension 0.1%

    One drop, single instillation, in randomized eye

    Also known as: Flarex

  • DrugLoteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel 0.38%

    One drop, single instillation, in randomized eye

    Also known as: Lotemax SM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants by Subject-rated Ocular Comfort

    Subject-rated ocular comfort was assessed on a 6-point ordered categorical scale. Response options, from least to most comfortable: 1 = strongly uncomfortable, 2 = very uncomfortable, 3 = slightly uncomfortable, 4 = neither comfortable nor uncomfortable, 5 = slightly comfortable, 6 = extremely comfortable Time frame: 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after instillation

    Time frame: 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after instillation

  2. Number of Participants by Subject-rated Impact on Vision

    5-point ordered categorical scale with response options: "very blurred," "significantly blurred," "slightly blurred," "no impact," and "neither."

    Time frame: 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after instillation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Eyes by Palpebral conjunctival injection (investigator-graded)

    Investigator grading scale 1-5 (1 = severe)

    Time frame: 30 seconds, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after instillation

  2. Number of Eyes with Corneal Staining Following Instillation

    Fluorescein staining assessment after final evaluation

    Time frame: After 10-minute evaluation

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse event monitoring (safety follow-up)

    Per protocol, adverse events were documented by the investigator and monitored through 7 days following instillation. Only serious adverse events were formally collected and analyzed; non-serious events were documented in clinical progress notes per the IRB-approved protocol.

    Time frame: Through 7 days after instillation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Williamson Eye Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70806, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — small tolerability study, summary results can be shared on clinicaltrials.gov

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07588074
Lead sponsor
Harrow Inc
Collaborators
Eyevance Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

Joshua Davidson, OD, FAAO
principal investigator · Williamson Eye Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion