ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07579065HematoCareUpdated Jul 24, 2026

HematoCare: Feasibility of a Survivorship Care Plan for Hematologic Cancer Patients Undergoing HSCT

An interventional study of Survivorship Care (SC) Plan in Hematologic Neoplasm, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Survivorship, sponsored by Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a feasibility study to implement a Survivorship Care (SC) Plan for patients with hematologic cancer undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The study evaluates if the intervention is feasible within the Italian national health system, focusing on retention rates, quality of life, unmet needs and caregiver burden

Read the detailed description

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), whether autologous or allogeneic, is a cornerstone of modern haematological oncology, with the volume of procedures steadily increasing both globally and nationally. The rise in survival rates beyond 12 months has made the management of long-term survivorship an emerging clinical and epidemiological priority.Despite its curative efficacy, HSCT and associated cytotoxic treatments lead to late and chronic complications that cause significant functional, social and psychological impairment. Factors such as recurrent infections, prolonged isolation and reduced mobility have a negative impact on quality of life, functional capacity and fatigue levels. At the same time, informal carers (family members or friends) bear a significant caregiving and emotional burden that threatens their overall well-being.An integrated assessment of the needs of both the patient and the carer as the core unit of care is essential to provide adequate support. Although Survivorship Care (SC) is recommended for the systematic management of late effects, its implementation in structured and sustainable models within the National Health Service remains complex.This prospective, single-center, single-arm study follows patients from hospital discharge to 6 months post-transplant. The intervention consists of a personalized SC Plan including treatment summaries, follow-up recommendations, and referrals to supportive services. Data on feasibility, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), unmet needs (SCNS-SF34), and caregiver burden (CRA) will be collected at T0 (baseline), T1 (100 days), and T2 (6 months).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematologic Neoplasm
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Survivorship
  • Cancer Survivorship

Keywords

  • Hematologic Malignancies
  • Survivorship Care
  • Quality of Life
  • Caregiver Burden
  • Unmet Needs
  • Feasibility Study
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
03

In context

Hematologic Neoplasms

1,444 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms; 420 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 46 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms.

Browse Hematologic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with hematologic cancer candidates for (autologous or allogeneic) and their informal caregivers
  • Able to provide
  • Able to communicate in Italian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients or caregivers with comorbidities hindering participation (e.g., significant cognitive limitations)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Survivorship Care Plan

    Patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), either autologous or allogeneic.

    Other: Survivorship Care (SC) Plan

Interventions

  • OtherSurvivorship Care (SC) Plan

    The SC plan is tailored to the patient's needs and accounts for the appropriate treatment summary, follow-up recommendations and advice addressed to health promotion and to the management of symptoms and treatments' side-effects. Upon discharge, patients will be followed up by a care coordinator (oncology/basic nurse, physical therapist, or occupational therapist) who will assess their QoL and perceived needs. Based on these results, the SC plan will be integrated with appropriate referral to educational resources, services, and/or sing-post to facilities available in the hospital and/or community.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Retention Fraction

    The percentage of enrolled patients who complete at least 70% of the scheduled assessments

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, a 30-item multidimensional instrument including a global health status scale, five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), and six single items assessing additional symptoms. Higher scores indicate better quality of life for global health status and functional scales, but worse symptom severity for symptom scales. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is estimated between 5 and 10 points.

    Time frame: baseline, 100days, 6 months

  2. Caregiver Burden assessed by Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA)

    Measured via the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) scale. It consists of 24 item evaluating five domains: impact on schedule, finances, lack of family support, health, and caregiver esteem. Domain scores are calculated as the mean of the corresponding items and range from 1 to 5. Higher scores represent a greater impact on the caregiver's life in each specific domain, except for 'Caregiver Esteem', where higher scores reflect a more positive experience

    Time frame: baseline, 100 days, 6 months

  3. Perceived needs of patients

    Perceived needs of patients assessed through Supportive Care Needs Survey - Short Form, 34 items (SCNS-SF34), a validated self-report instrument assessing perceived supportive care needs of adult cancer patients across five domains: psychological, health system and information, physical and daily living, patient care and support, and sexuality. Scoring and Interpretation: Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where: 1. means 'No need' (satisfied) 2. means 'No need' (already met) 3, 4, and 5 indicate 'Unmet need' (low, moderate, and high, respectively). For each domain, the raw scores are transformed into a standardized scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a greater level of unmet needs, meaning that the patient requires more support in that specific area.

    Time frame: baseline, 100 days, 6 months

  4. Usability of data collection - Patient Perspective

    This assessment will be conducted from the perspectives of patients using structured questionnaires developed for this study. The implementation outcomes of acceptability, appropriates, adoption, and feasibility will be investigated. Specifically, the questionnaire will assess the perceived length of the question battery (burden), potential item redundancy, and the overall relevance and sensitivity of the topics addressed in relation to the post-transplant experience.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Providers' ability to deliver the SC plan

    Providers' ability to deliver the SC plan will be assessed through a post-intervention questionnaire. This tool will verify the successful delivery of the core components of the SC plan by evaluating the following domains: fidelity, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Quality of Life assessed by EORTC QLQ-HDC29

    Quality of life will be assessed using the disease-specific EORTC QLQ-HDC29 module for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. This instrument includes 29 items divided into six multi-item scales (gastrointestinal side effects, worries/anxiety, impact on family, body image, sexuality, and in-patient issues) and eight single items (skin problems, fever, urinary frequency, bone pain, ability to complete activities, spirituality, fertility, and medication intake). Higher scores indicate greater impairment in quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 100 days, 6 months

  7. Usability of Data Collection - Provider Perspective

    This assessment will be conducted from the perspectives of healthcare providers, using structured questionnaires developed for this study. The evaluation will focus on feasibility and appropriateness. The questionnaire will assess whether the data collection process was manageable within standard clinical timeframes and, crucially, whether the tools effectively supported the professional in gathering actionable information to integrate the SC Plan.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Research and EBP Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
    Reggio Emilia, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Barbara Bressi · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Spellman SR, Xu K, Oloyede T, Ahn KW, Akhtar O, Bolon YT, Broglie L, Bloomquist J, Bupp C, Chen M, Devine SM, El-Jurdi N, Hamadani M, Hengen M, Huppler AH, Jaglowski S, Kuxhausen M, Lee SJ, Moskop A, Page KM, Pasquini MC, Perez W, Phelan R, Rizzo D, Saber W, Stefanski HE, Steinert P, Tuschl E, Visotcky A, Vogel R, Auletta JJ, Shaw BE, Allbee-Johnson M. Current Activity Trends and Outcomes in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy - A Report from the CIBMTR. Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Aug;31(8):505-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.05.014. Epub 2025 May 19. PubMed 40398621 ↗
  • Gratwohl A, Sureda A, Baldomero H, Gratwohl M, Dreger P, Kroger N, Ljungman P, McGrath E, Mohty M, Nagler A, Rambaldi A, de Elvira CR, Snowden JA, Passweg J, Apperley J, Niederwieser D, Stijnen T, Brand R; Joint Accreditation Committee (JACIE) of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the European Leukemia Net (ELN). Economics and Outcome After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. EBioMedicine. 2015 Nov 19;2(12):2101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.021. eCollection 2015 Dec. PubMed 26844291 ↗
  • Hung YC, Bauer J, Horsley P, Waterhouse M, Bashford J, Isenring E. Changes in nutritional status, body composition, quality of life, and physical activity levels of cancer patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1579-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1698-y. Epub 2013 Jan 10. PubMed 23306934 ↗
  • Molassiotis A, Wilson B, Blair S, Howe T, Cavet J. Unmet supportive care needs, psychological well-being and quality of life in patients living with multiple myeloma and their partners. Psychooncology. 2011 Jan;20(1):88-97. doi: 10.1002/pon.1710. PubMed 20187072 ↗
  • Shaw BE, Hahn T, Martin PJ, Mitchell SA, Petersdorf EW, Armstrong GT, Shelburne N, Storer BE, Bhatia S. National Institutes of Health Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Late Effects Initiative: The Research Methodology and Study Design Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jan;23(1):10-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 30. PubMed 27590102 ↗
  • Jordan K, Aapro M, Kaasa S, Ripamonti CI, Scotte F, Strasser F, Young A, Bruera E, Herrstedt J, Keefe D, Laird B, Walsh D, Douillard JY, Cervantes A. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):36-43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx757. PubMed 29253069 ↗
  • Contri A, Paltrinieri S, Torreggiani M, Chiara Bassi M, Mazzini E, Guberti M, Campanini I, Ghirotto L, Fugazzaro S, Costi S. Patient-reported outcome measure to implement routine assessment of cancer survivors' unmet needs: An overview of reviews and COSMIN analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2023 Nov;120:102622. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102622. Epub 2023 Sep 9. PubMed 37713972 ↗
  • Schiavi M, Costi S, Barbieri I, Ghirotto L, Fugazzaro S, Bressi B, Paltrinieri S, Luminari S, Contri A. Identifying unmet needs in cancer survivorship by linking patient-reported outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 29;32(12):835. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09019-8. PubMed 39612038 ↗
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. PubMed 20957426 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07579065
Lead sponsor
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

Barbara Bressi
Contact
barbara.bressi@ausl.re.it
Stefania Costi
Contact
stefania.costi2@ausl.re.it

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion