CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07578935Updated May 11, 2026

Comparative Effects of Dynamic Stability Drills and Plyometric Training After Anterior Crutiate Ligament Reconstruction

An interventional study of Dynamic Stability Drills and Plyometric Training in Sports Physical Therapy, sponsored by Riphah International University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered May 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Terminal Extension lag (TEL) is a condition that develops when active range of extension is smaller than passive range; frequently noticed in post-traumatic knees after injuries and Anterior Cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. TEL is typically seen within 6 to 12 weeks after ACL reconstruction. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery is a critical surgical intervention used to repair ACL tear; which is common among those who are engaged in physical demanding activities and Sportsmen. In the initial days following surgery terminal extension lag affects up to 10 to 35% of individuals. ACL is expectational because it's not just a static stabilizer of knee but also transfers proprioceptive information to the brain so to improve joint's dynamics. This study aims to compare effects of Dynamic Stability Drills (DSD) and Plyometric Training (PT) in reducing terminal knee extension lag in post-ACL reconstruction patients. This study will be a Randomized Clinical Trail and will be conducted in Physiotherapy Department of Bethania Hospital Sialkot. Non-Probability Convenience Sampling will be used to collect data. Total of 48 Participants of the age 20 to 40 years with terminal extension lag of moderate lag stage (typically 9-12 weeks post-op with 5-10° lag) will be selected as sample size. An informed consent will be taken prior study from all the subjects. Outcomes measure will be included Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, Single Leg Hope Test and Y Balance Test (Y-BAL) for Dynamic Stability, Universal Goniometer (UG) for Range of Motion, Sphygmomanometer for Knee Strength, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, (IKDC) for Knee function and Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) Calculations. Subjects will be divided into two groups by random number generator table. Both groups will receive a standard physiotherapy protocols which will include: Hot pack , TENS , Mobilizations, Stretching and Strengthening. Group A will receive Dynamic Stability Drills and Group B will receive Plyometric Training along with conventional treatment. Patient will come 3 time a week and data will be recollected after 6 weeks. Data will be analyzed by SPSS version 25.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

  • Plyometric Exercise
  • Terminal Extension Lag
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 20-40
  • Both Genders (male \& female)
  • History of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) between 1-3 years
  • Moderate stage (5 to 10 ˚) of terminal extension lag after ACL reconstruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other previously serious knee pain and/or surgery limiting of knee range of motion(2)
  • Any traumatic conditions around the knee, or any infectious or tumors conditions i.e.

meniscus injury, fracture, dislocation or osteochondral injury

  • Pregnancy, any recently underwent abdominal and back surgery
  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²
  • Any systemic and/or neurological illness, rheumatoid arthritis, osteomyelitis, any neurological disorders, spinal disorders, obesity, Dementia, inflammatory conditions like Ankylosing spondylitis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Osteoporosis, Diabetic neuropathy,
  • Red flags such as Trauma, Cancer, Constitutional Symptoms (Fever, Malaise, Weight Loss), Recent Infection, Mental retardation, Hemiparesis / Hemiplegia
  • Subjects with presence of any fractures
  • Heart/diabetic patients
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dynamic Stability Drills

    Other: Dynamic Stability Drills

  • Active comparator
    Plyometric Training

    Other: Plyometric Training

Interventions

  • OtherDynamic Stability Drills

    Weak 1-2 Stability Foundation Weight shifts (anterior/posterior, lateral, Double-leg stance on foam surface, Eyes-closed balance (double-leg), Isometric quad \& hamstring contractions, Wall sits + small ball between knees (activate adductors \& quads)Weeks 3-4: Progressive Dynamic Stability, Single-leg stance on foam, Thera-band perturbation drills (knees and hips), TKE (Terminal Knee Extension) on unstable surfaces, Step-downs from 6-inch height (with control),Lateral step-overs (slow \& controlled)

  • OtherPlyometric Training

    Weak 1-2: Four types of plyometrics: A) bilateral off-set (alternating box jump) B) bilateral asymmetrical (split jump) C) bilateral symmetrical (30 cm drop jump) and D) unilateral (30 cm drop jump(13) Weak 3-4: 1. A lateral jump from left to right limb (A) with landing (B) and immediate jump back to the right limb (C) as opposed to just landing in which occurs during Stage 2(13). 2. Images of a countermovement or squat jump in place with maximal height. The removal of the box results in higher landing forces due to landing from a higher height(13

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Single leg hope test

    Jumping as far as you can on one leg while maintaining your balance and landing firmly is the goal of this challenge. The starting line and the landing leg's heel are used to estimate the distance

    Time frame: 6th week

  2. Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) Calculation

    the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) calculates the performance difference between two limbs, typically the affected and unaffected limbs following an accident; by dividing the score of the injured limb by the score of the unaffected limb and multiplying the result by 100. It's represented in percentage

    Time frame: 6th week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Rabiya Noor
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Giraldo JL, Fu FH. The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):130-7. doi: 10.1177/036354659702500126. PubMed 9006708 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07578935
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2026
Start date
Jan 15, 2026
Primary completion
May 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Rabiya Noor, PhD
Contact
rabiya.noor@riphah.edu.pk
0334 4355660
Rabiya Noor, PhD
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion