CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07578844Updated May 11, 2026

Comparative Effects of Somatosensory Stimulation and Task Based Mirror Therapy in Post Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Somatosensory Stimulation and Mirror Therapy: in Stroke, Stroke (CVA) or TIA and Upper Limb Function, sponsored by Riphah International University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will be conducted at the Department of Physical Therapy, DHQ Hospital Sheikhupura, over duration of eleven months. A total of 20 stroke patients meeting inclusion criteria will be conveniently sampled and randomly assigned into two groups. Group A will receive somatosensory stimulation, while Group B will undergo task-based mirror therapy. Interventions will be administered five times per week for four weeks. Upper limb function will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Box and Block Test (BBT) to assess upper limb motor function, task based performance and gross motor dexterity. Data analysis will be performed using SPSS version 26.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Stroke (CVA) or TIA
  • Upper Limb Function

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mirror Therapy
  • Motot recovery
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Somatosensory Stimulation
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: above 40-70 years
  • Both Male and female patients
  • Unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Having attack duration of 1 to 6 months
  • Mild - Moderate motor impairment
  • Moderate cognitive ability according to Mini-mental State Examination score >24 3 grade Brunnstrom upper extremity stage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aphasia
  • Serious unilateral neglect (Star Cancellation Test ≤ 44/54) or visual field deficiency
  • Any other comorbid neurological diseases except for stroke
  • Diagnosis of any other neuromuscular or orthopedic disease in the upper extremities
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Task based Mirror Therapy

    Patients will be administered with Task-Based Mirror Therapy, where they will practice real-life functional movement through a mirror reflection of the movement of the affected upper limb. The mirror will be located with a sagittal angle so that the reflection of the patient only display the image of the non-affected limb, resulting in an optical illusion that both limbs move symmetrically

    Other: Mirror Therapy:

  • Experimental
    Somatosensory Stimulation

    The group will be provided with somatosensory stimulation-induced rehabilitation of the upper limb, which will personalize to patients with both motor and sensory disturbance after stroke. The aim of the therapy will be to improve the functioning of upper limbs that focused directly on tactile, proprioceptive, and sensory discrimination abilities (14). The session will be started with a 5-minute warm-up, and the muscle groups involved active-assisted movement of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist to achieve better circulation and excite the limb to receive the sensations. Patients will be advised to direct their attention to the kinaesthetics of motion.

    Other: Somatosensory Stimulation

Interventions

  • OtherSomatosensory Stimulation

    The group will be provided with somatosensory stimulation-induced rehabilitation of the upper limb, which will personalize to patients with both motor and sensory disturbance after stroke. The aim of the therapy will be to improve the functioning of upper limbs that focused directly on tactile, proprioceptive, and sensory discrimination abilities (14). The session will be started with a 5-minute warm-up, and the muscle groups involved active-assisted movement of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist to achieve better circulation and excite the limb to receive the sensations. Patients will be advised to direct their attention to the kinaesthetics of motion.

    Also known as: somatosensory stimulation-induced rehabilitation

  • OtherMirror Therapy:

    Patients will be administered with Task-Based Mirror Therapy, where they will practice real-life functional movement through a mirror reflection of the movement of the affected upper limb. The mirror will be located with a sagittal angle so that the reflection of the patient only display the image of the non-affected limb, resulting in an optical illusion that both limbs move symmetrically

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. BOX & BLOCK TEST

    The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a performance-based measure of gross manual dexterity that allows clinicians to infer about levels of activity

    Time frame: 4th Week

  2. ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST

    Action research arm test has been used widely clinically for the assessment of upper extremity function post stroke and in various other conditions. Measurement of recovery after stroke is becoming increasingly important with the advent of new treatment options under investigation in stroke rehabilitation research.

    Time frame: 4th Week

Other outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is recommended for evaluation of sensorimotor impairment post stroke, but the item-level reliability of the scale is unknown. The FMA-UE is reliable both within and between raters in patients with stroke in the early subacute phase. A wider international use of FMA-UE will allow comparison of stroke recovery between regions and countries and thereby potentially improve the quality of care and rehabilitation in persons with stroke worldwide.

    Time frame: 4th week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Physical Therapy, DHQ Hospital Sheikhupura
    Sheikhupura, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07578844
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 11, 2026

Study contacts

Zain Ul Abbas, Ms
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion