ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07573605Updated May 7, 2026

Core Stability Training Combined With Plyometric Exercises on Vertical Jump Performance:

An interventional study of Core stability exercises with plyometric training and Plyometric exercise alone in Athletic Injuries/Prevention and Control, sponsored by Gulf Medical University. Completed at 1 site in United Arab Emirates. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Gulf Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2016, registered Apr 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
19 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study protocol investigates whether adding core stability training to a plyometric training program enhances vertical jump performance in elite high jump athletes over a six-week period. It is hypothesized that combined core stability and plyometric training will result in greater improvements in vertical jump distance compared to plyometric training alone.

Elite high jump athletes are allocated into two groups based on their existing training squads: a combined intervention group (COMBO) receiving both core stability and plyometric training, and a plyometric-only group (PLYO). Both groups follow a structured six-week training program, with vertical jump distance measured before and after the intervention period to assess changes in performance.

From a clinical and applied sports science perspective, the findings of this protocol may help determine whether incorporating core stability exercises into existing plyometric programs provides additional benefit for improving explosive lower-limb performance, thereby informing evidence-based training prescription for high jump athletes.

Read the detailed description

This study is a six-week, non-randomized, two-arm comparative intervention designed to evaluate the effects of combined core stability and plyometric training versus plyometric training alone on vertical jump performance in elite high jump athletes.

A total of eligible elite high jump athletes are allocated into two groups based on their existing training squads to minimize disruption to routine coaching structures. This non-randomized allocation reflects real-world training environments. The intervention group (COMBO) receives a combined program of core stability and plyometric training, while the comparison group (PLYO) performs plyometric training alone.

Plyometric Training Protocol (Both Groups - COMBO and PLYO)

The plyometric program is designed to enhance explosive power, speed, and agility using structured progressive exercises. Equipment includes variable-sized Swiss balls, 45 cm plyometric boxes for box jumps, a 30 cm depth jump box, sports cones for agility drills, and a synthetic long jump surface.

Each training session begins with a 5-10 minute active warm-up involving light jogging, dynamic stretching, and mobility exercises, and ends with a 10-minute cool-down phase. Participants continue their regular resistance training twice weekly on non-consecutive days targeting upper body, lower body, and trunk muscle groups.

Plyometric exercises are organized according to progression principles based on intensity, coordination, balance demands, limb involvement, and impact level. Training progresses from low-impact bilateral linear jumps to higher-intensity multidirectional and single-leg landing drills, with gradual increases in complexity to improve neuromuscular control and landing mechanics.

Core Stability Training Protocol (COMBO Group Only)

The core stability program follows a structured progression from basic stabilization to dynamic control based on established core training principles.

Week 1 includes supine pelvic tilts, lunge-position pelvic control exercises, and bilateral pelvic bridges. Week 2 progresses to unilateral pelvic bridges and quadruped bracing exercises without Swiss ball support. Weeks 3 and 4 focus on static core stability tasks, including contralateral single-leg holds and quadruped exercises using a Swiss ball. During Weeks 5 and 6, dynamic core exercises such as upper body roll-outs are introduced once adequate control is achieved.

Core stability exercises are performed for 12-15 minutes per session, with 8-10 repetitions per set and 2-3 sets per session, three times per week for six weeks.

Training Delivery and Supervision

Both interventions are demonstrated prior to commencement by two qualified physical therapists and two athletic coaches. Training is conducted at separate training sites according to group allocation. The structure of each program remains consistent throughout the intervention period.

Outcome Measurement

The primary outcome is vertical jump distance measured in centimeters using a standardized protocol. Participants perform a standing reach test followed by a maximal vertical jump. Jump height is calculated as the difference between standing reach and maximal jump reach. Each participant performs three trials, and the highest value is used for analysis. Assessments are conducted before and after the six-week intervention by an independent blinded assessor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Athletic Injuries/Prevention and Control

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Athletic performance
  • Muscle Strength
  • Core stability
  • Vertical jump
03

In context

Athletic Injuries

258 studies on the registry are indexed under Athletic Injuries; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 44 across 164 interventional studies indexed under Athletic Injuries.

Browse Athletic Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Gulf Medical University is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elite voluntary high jump athletes (male and/or female)
  • Age range between 19-24 years
  • Minimum of 3 years of structured high jump training experience
  • Currently participating in regular training (at least 3 sessions per week)
  • Medically fit to participate in plyometric and core stability training
  • Enrolled in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of lower limb musculoskeletal trauma within the past three months
  • Chronic asthma
  • Ongoing physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain
  • Neurological conditions
  • History of severe anxiety and depression
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Plyometric training alone

    The plyometric training program uses variable-sized Swiss balls, 45 cm plyometric boxes for box jumps, a 30 cm box for depth jumps, sports cones for agility drills, and a synthetic long jump surface. Each session begins with a 5-10 minute active warm-up consisting of light jogging, dynamic stretching, and mobility exercises, followed by the plyometric training protocol, and concludes with a 10-minute cool-down period. Participants are instructed to continue their regular resistance training twice per week on non-consecutive days, targeting the upper body, lower body, and trunk, as per standard training

    Other: Plyometric exercise alone

  • Experimental
    Combined core-plyometric (COMBO) training

    The core training regimen begins with fundamental core stabilization exercises and progresses to moderate-level training based on established core training principles. During the first week, exercises include pelvic tilts in supine and lunge positions, along with bilateral pelvic bridges. In the second week, the program progresses to unilateral pelvic bridges and quadruped bracing exercises performed without a Swiss ball. This is followed by two weeks of static core exercises, including contralateral single-leg holds and quadruped positioning using a Swiss ball. Once participants demonstrate adequate control and confidence with static exercises, dynamic movements such as upper body roll-outs are progressively introduced during the final two weeks of the program. Core stability exercises are performed for 12-15 minutes per session, with 8-10 repetitions per set and 2-3 sets per session, three times per week for six weeks.

    Other: Core stability exercises with plyometric training

Interventions

  • OtherCore stability exercises with plyometric training

    Participants receive both core stability and plyometric training. The core program begins with basic stabilization exercises and progressively advances to moderate-level training based on established principles. Week 1 includes pelvic tilts and bilateral bridges; Week 2 progresses to unilateral bridges and quadruped bracing without a Swiss ball. This is followed by two weeks of static exercises (e.g., contralateral single-leg holds, quadruped with Swiss ball), and finally dynamic exercises such as upper body roll-outs in the last two weeks. Core exercises are performed for 12-15 minutes per session, with 8-10 repetitions per set, 2-3 sets per session, three times per week for six weeks. Both interventions are demonstrated by qualified physical therapists and athletic coaches at different training sites.

  • OtherPlyometric exercise alone

    The plyometric training program uses variable-sized Swiss balls, 45 cm plyometric boxes for box jumps, a 30 cm depth jump box, sports cones, and a synthetic long jump surface. Each session begins with a 5-10 minute warm-up involving light jogging, dynamic stretching, and mobility exercises, and ends with a 10-minute cool-down. Participants continue their regular resistance training twice weekly on non-consecutive days, targeting major muscle groups. The program is designed to improve speed, agility, and quickness and follows a structured progression based on exercise complexity and intensity (low to high), considering balance, coordination, limb involvement, and impact level. It begins with simple, low-impact bilateral linear jumps and progresses to complex, high-impact, multidirectional and single-leg landing drills based on participant readiness, promoting gradual improvements in strength, control, and landing mechanics.

    Also known as: PLYO

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vertical Jump test

    Vertical Jump test

    Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks"

  2. Vertical Jump test

    The primary outcome variable of this study is vertical jump distance, measured in centimetres following standard assessment guidelines. Participants begin from a static standing position and are instructed to reach upward maximally with one hand to establish the standing reach height. They then perform a maximal vertical jump after flexing their knees to approximately 90°, aiming to reach as high as possible. The vertical jump distance is calculated as the difference between the standing reach height and the highest point touched during the jump. An independent assessor, blinded to the intervention allocation, records all measurements. Each participant performs three trials, and the highest value obtained is used for statistical analysis.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Watson Arulsingh
    Al Jurf, Ajman Emirate 4184, United Arab Emirates
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. Institutional policies and the approved ethics protocol do not permit external sharing of raw participant data. Additionally, participants provided informed consent only for the use of their data in aggregated, de-identified form for publication purposes. Only summary statistics and final outcome measures will be reported in the manuscript.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2016 to primary completion in Apr 2017, 13 months.

Of 119 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Athletic Injuries, half reached primary completion within 5 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 14. This study's 13 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 121 studies reached it within 5 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 14.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2026
First posted
May 7, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2017
CompletionActual
May 1, 2017
Last update
May 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07573605
Lead sponsor
Gulf Medical University
Collaborators
Alva's College of Physiotherapy
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 7, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2016
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2017
Completion
May 1, 2017
Last update
May 7, 2026

Study contacts

Watson Arulsingh, PhD
study chair · Gulf Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion