ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07573046ExéSemValUpdated May 7, 2026

Validation Study of the ExéSem Battery Designed to Differentiate the Contribution of Executive Functions in Semantic Disorders

An observational study in Alzheimer's Disease, Vascular Neurocognitive Disorder and Progressive Primary Aphasia Semantic Variant, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140
Ages
50 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This protocol describes a study aimed at evaluating the psychometric properties of the ExéSem battery, developed to differentiate semantic deficits from executive semantic impairments in patients with post-lesional or neurodegenerative anomia. Currently available tools do not allow a straightforward distinction between these deficits, limiting diagnostic accuracy and clinical management. The ExéSem battery was developed through a collaboration between Hospices Civils de Lyon, the University of Mons, and Laval University to address this gap.

The battery includes three main tasks: (1) a dual task combining semantic judgment and semantic matching using identical items, (2) a word-picture matching task, and (3) a rapid naming task. Each task is designed to manipulate the level of executive control required to access semantic representations. This allows the identification of whether performance declines under increased executive demand, thereby distinguishing executive-related semantic impairments.

Read the detailed description

This protocol describes a study aimed at evaluating the psychometric properties of the ExéSem battery, developed to differentiate semantic deficits from executive semantic impairments in patients with post-lesional or neurodegenerative anomia. Currently available tools do not allow a straightforward distinction between these deficits, limiting diagnostic accuracy and clinical management. The ExéSem battery was developed through a collaboration between Hospices Civils de Lyon, the University of Mons, and Laval University to address this gap.

The battery includes three main tasks: (1) a dual task combining semantic judgment and semantic matching using identical items, (2) a word-picture matching task, and (3) a rapid naming task. Each task is designed to manipulate the level of executive control required to access semantic representations. This allows the identification of whether performance declines under increased executive demand, thereby distinguishing executive-related semantic impairments.

The primary objective is to assess the sensitivity of the ExéSem battery by comparing performances between participants with neurocognitive disorders (mild or major) and cognitively healthy controls. Secondary objectives include evaluating specificity, concurrent validity through comparison with established neuropsychological tests (BECLA, Trail Making Test, Stroop), and the influence of demographic variables (age, sex, education level).

This is a prospective, experimental, comparative, single-center study, classified as a non-interventional study involving human participants (RIPH3). Two populations will be included: cognitively healthy individuals and patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, vascular neurocognitive disorder, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. Participants will be aged 50 to 90 years, native French speakers, affiliated with a social security system, and informed with non-opposition collected.

The primary endpoint is the total score on the ExéSem battery (maximum score: 172). Secondary endpoints include sub-scores for each task (semantic judgment and matching, word-picture matching, rapid naming), as well as performance on reference tests to assess convergent validity. The effects of age, sex, and education level, as well as task completion times, will also be analyzed.

A single study visit is planned. After receiving information and a reflection period, participants will complete demographic questionnaires and undergo cognitive assessments, including screening tests (MoCA, DTLA for controls), reference tests (Trail Making Test, Stroop, BECLA), and the ExéSem battery. The total duration of testing is approximately 80 minutes, including 30 minutes for ExéSem.

Risks are minimal and mainly related to cognitive fatigue. Participants with abnormal screening results will be referred for further clinical evaluation outside the study. This research aims to improve diagnostic accuracy in semantic disorders and to better guide cognitive rehabilitation strategies.

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Vascular neurocognitive disorder
  • Progressive Primary Aphasia semantic variant
  • People without neurocognitive disorder
02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Vascular Neurocognitive Disorder
  • Progressive Primary Aphasia Semantic Variant
  • People Without Neurocognitive Disorder

Keywords

  • Anomia
  • Semantic disorders
  • Executive control
  • Neurocognitive disorders
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is below the median of 200 across 814 observational studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes two groups aged 50 to 90 years: cognitively healthy participants and patients with mild to moderate neurocognitive disorders (MMSE ≥20/30), including Alzheimer's disease, vascular neurocognitive disorder, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

Healthy participants are recruited on a voluntary basis through flyers displayed in the Charpennes Hospital and distributed by speech therapy and neuropsychology students. Interested individuals contact the Clinical Research Center (CRC), where they receive initial information during a phone call and are provided with the study information sheet before scheduling an inclusion visit.

Patients with neurocognitive disorders are recruited during routine clinical care (consultation or day hospital assessment).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Participants without cognitive impairment
  • Participant aged 50 to 90 years (inclusive);
  • Participant whose native language is French
  • Participant affiliated with or entitled to a social security scheme;
  • Participants who have been informed and have not objected.
  • Participants with cognitive impairment
  • Participant aged 50 to 90 years (inclusive);
  • Participant whose native language is French
  • Participant receiving memory care with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, at the stage of minor or major neurocognitive impairment, according to the 2011 NIA-AA criteria (McKahn et al., 2011), or with a diagnosis of vascular neurocognitive impairment according to the VasCog-2-WSO diagnostic criteria (Sachdev et al., 2025), or with a diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia with semantic variant (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011).
  • (MMSE) score ≥ 20/30, within the 6 months preceding enrollment;
  • Participants affiliated with or entitled to a social security scheme;
  • Participants who have been informed and have not objected.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - For all participants:
  • Severe, progressive, or unstable medical conditions that may interfere with assessment variables (epilepsy, acute psychiatric or psychotic disorders, visual hallucinations, acute infection);
  • Substance use that may affect cognitive performance;
  • Deafness or blindness that may compromise the participant's assessment or participation in tasks and scales;
  • Participants under guardianship, curatorship, or legal protection;
  • Pregnant, postpartum, or breastfeeding women.
  • Specifically for participants without cognitive impairment:
  • Participants previously diagnosed with cognitive impairment.
  • Specifically for participants with cognitive impairment:
  • Severe behavioral and psychological symptoms that prevent task completion, as determined by the investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants without cognitive impairment

    Participanst with a MoCA score greater than or equal to 26/30 and a score greater than the alert threshold based on age and education level on the DTLA scale. Participants who have never received a diagnosis of cognitive impairment.

    Diagnostic Test: ExéSem cognitive battery

  • Participants with Cognitive Impairment

    Participants receiving memory clinic care with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, at the stage of minor or major neurocognitive impairment, according to the 2011 NIA-AA criteria, or with a diagnosis of vascular neurocognitive impairment according to the VasCog-2-WSO diagnostic criteria , or with a diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia with semantic variant. Participants with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 20/30, within the 6 months preceding enrollment;

    Diagnostic Test: ExéSem cognitive battery

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testExéSem cognitive battery

    The ExéSem battery is a neuropsychological assessment tool designed to evaluate semantic processing and the contribution of executive control in patients with or without neurocognitive disorders. It consists of three tasks: (1) a dual task combining semantic judgment and semantic matching using identical items, (2) a word-to-picture matching task, and (3) a rapid naming task. Each task is structured to manipulate the level of executive demand required to access semantic representations. This variation allows the identification of whether semantic difficulties remain stable or worsen under increased executive load, thereby distinguishing primary semantic deficits from executive-related semantic impairments. The battery is administered by a trained professional using standardized instructions and requires approximately 30 minutes to complete. It is used for diagnostic and research purposes only and does not involve any therapeutic intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Score obtained on the ExéSem battery

    The primary outcome is the total score on the ExéSem battery (max=172), assessing semantic and executive-semantic processing. The battery includes semantic judgment (30 items), semantic matching (20 items), word-image matching (72 items), and rapid naming (50 items). Tasks vary in executive demand to determine whether performance declines under increased cognitive load, distinguishing primary semantic deficits from executive-related impairments.

    Time frame: At enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2029, 35 months later.

Of 364 non-industry observational studies under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 81 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 203. This study's planned 35 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 405 studies reached it within 67 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 171.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2026
First posted
May 7, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 9, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 9, 2029
Last update
May 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07573046
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 7, 2026
Start date
Sep 9, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 9, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion