CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07571980Updated May 7, 2026

The Effects of Low-Flow and Normal-Flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Frontal QRS-T Angle and TP-e Interval

An observational study in Cardiac Arrhythmia and Anesthesia, sponsored by Istanbul University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-07.

Sponsored by Istanbul University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures involve pneumoperitoneum and volatile anesthetics, both of which can significantly influence cardiovascular physiology and autonomic balance. While volatile anesthetics are known to affect myocardial repolarization, the specific impact of Low-Flow Anesthesia (LFA)-a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technique-on these cardiac markers remains under-researched.

This prospective observational study aims to compare the effects of low-flow versus normal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on two critical non-invasive biomarkers of ventricular repolarization: the Frontal QRS-T angle and the Tp-e interval. These parameters are essential for predicting electrical instability and the risk of malignant arrhythmias. The study will evaluate a total of 128 patients to determine whether different fresh gas flow rates lead to significant changes in cardiac electrophysiological stability during the perioperative and early postoperative periods.

Read the detailed description

This prospective observational study is designed to investigate the electrophysiological effects of different fresh gas flow rates during sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic procedures involving pneumoperitoneum and volatile anesthetics are known to influence autonomic nervous system balance and cardiovascular stability. While the impact of inhalation agents on myocardial repolarization is documented, the specific effects of Low-Flow Anesthesia (LFA)-an environmentally and economically favorable technique-on markers of electrical instability remain to be fully elucidated. The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the effects of low-flow and normal-flow sevoflurane techniques on the Frontal QRS-T angle and the Tp-e interval, which serve as critical non-invasive biomarkers for predicting malignant arrhythmia risk and reflecting the transmural distribution of ventricular repolarization.

The study protocol involves 128 patients, a sample size determined by power analysis (80% power, 0.05 alpha) to account for a predicted 35% difference between groups and potential dropouts. Patients are observationally assigned to either the Low-Flow Group (LFG) or the Normal-Flow Group (NFG) according to routine clinical practice. Following a standardized induction and an initial stabilization phase at 4-6 L/min, flow rates are adjusted once the target concentration (MACage +1) is reached: the LFG is reduced to 0.5 L/min, while the NFG is maintained at 2 L/min. Ventilation is managed to keep EtCO2 between 35-45 mmHg. Data collection is performed via high-resolution ECG recordings at four time points: preoperative baseline (T1), 5 minutes post-intubation (T2), 15 minutes post-intubation (T3), and 15 minutes postoperatively (T4).

Another key focus of this research is the detailed analysis of secondary outcomes, including the monitoring of hemodynamic stability (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) across all time points. Furthermore, the study aims to characterize the electrophysiological profile of each technique by analyzing the Tp-e/QT ratio and calculating time-dependent variations in repolarization parameters, specifically the delta changes from baseline to intraoperative stages (ΔT1-T2 and ΔT1-T3). Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted by determining the total volume of volatile anesthetic consumed in both techniques. Statistical analysis will involve independent samples t-tests for inter-group comparisons, while repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction will evaluate time-dependent changes. Pearson correlation analysis will be utilized to assess the relationships between continuous variables, providing a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of low-flow versus normal-flow anesthesia management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrhythmia
  • Anesthesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

885 studies on the registry are indexed under Arrhythmias, Cardiac; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 128 is below the median of 200 across 414 observational studies indexed under Arrhythmias, Cardiac.

Browse Arrhythmias, Cardiac studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients (aged 18 years and older) scheduled for elective or semi-elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a tertiary care training and research hospital.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years and older.
  • Patients scheduled for elective or semi-elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Patients who provide written voluntary informed consent.
  • Patients with a predicted surgical duration between 60 and 180 minutes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with heart failure.
  • Patients with valvular heart disease or pathology.
  • Patients with hemodynamic instability.
  • Patients requiring blood transfusion.
  • Patients with a preoperative corrected QT (QTc) interval > 450 ms.
  • Patients with a known history of cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Patients scheduled for emergency surgery.
  • Patients with a known risk or family history of malignant hyperthermia.
  • Use of medications associated with QT interval prolongation (e.g., ketamine, 5-HT3 antagonists, quetiapine, etc.).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Low-Flow Group (LFG)

    Anesthesia induction and initial stabilization (first 6-8 minutes at 4-6 L/min) follow standard hospital protocols. Fresh Gas Flow (FGF) reduced to 0.5 L/min after the target concentration (MACage +1) is reached. Ventilation parameters are adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) between 35-45 mmHg with a minimum FiO2 of 0.30. Volatile anesthetics are discontinued 15 minutes before the estimated end of surgery. Pre-oxygenation and wash-out are performed at 5-6 L/min with 80% oxygen prior to extubation.

    Procedure: low flow anesthesia

  • Normal-Flow Group (NFG)

    Anesthesia induction and initial stabilization (first 6-8 minutes at 4-6 L/min) follow standard hospital protocols. Fresh Gas Flow (FGF) maintained at 2 L/min during anesthesia maintenance. Ventilation parameters are adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) between 35-45 mmHg with a minimum FiO2 of 0.30. Volatile anesthetics are discontinued 15 minutes before the estimated end of surgery. Pre-oxygenation and wash-out are performed at 5-6 L/min with 80% oxygen prior to extubation.

Interventions

  • Procedurelow flow anesthesia

    Fresh Gas Flow (FGF) reduced to 0.5 L/min after the target concentration (MACage +1) is reached.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frontal QRS-T angle

    electrocardiogram

    Time frame: Pre-operative period, 5 minutes after induction, 15 minutes after induction, post operative 15th minute

  2. Tp-e interval

    electrocardiogram

    Time frame: Pre-operative period, 5 minutes after induction, 15 minutes after induction, post-operative 15th minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. blood pressure

    Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitor

    Time frame: during peri-operative period

  2. heart rate

    electrocardiogram

    Time frame: during peri-operative period

  3. Tp-e/QT ratio

    electrocardiogram

    Time frame: Pre-operative period, 5 minutes after induction, 15 minutes after induction, post-operative 15th minute

  4. Total amount of volatile anesthetic consumed

    Mindray anesthesia machine

    Time frame: end of operation

  5. Total amount of Remifentanil consumed

    infusion pump

    Time frame: end of operation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yildirim H, Adanir T, Atay A, Katircioglu K, Savaci S. The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane on QT interval of the ECG. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Jul;21(7):566-70. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504007112. PubMed 15318470 ↗
  • Kim NY, Han DW, Koh JC, Rha KH, Hong JH, Park JM, Kim SY. Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Heart Rate-Corrected QT and Tpeak-Tend Intervals During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With Steep Trendelenburg Position: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(19):e3645. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003645. PubMed 27175685 ↗
  • Bingol Tanriverdi T, Tercan M, Patmano G, Tanriverdi Z, Gusun Halitoglu A, Kaya A. The Effect of Low-Flow and Normal-Flow Desflurane Anesthesia on the Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty Operation: A Randomized Prospective Study. Cureus. 2022 Sep 8;14(9):e28920. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28920. eCollection 2022 Sep. PubMed 36225439 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07571980
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University
Responsible party
Cansu UZUNTURK (specialist in anesthesiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2026
Start date
May 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion