ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07566507HLEX-TOUpdated May 15, 2026

High-Energy Laser in the Conservative Treatment of Rhizarthrosis

An interventional study of THEAL:Ixyon XP (Mectronic, Bergamo, Italy) in Thumb Osteoarthritis, Hand Injuries and Laser, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-15.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Apr 2026).
  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that can affect the hands and is particularly debilitating when it involves the trapeziometacarpal joint (rhizarthrosis). It causes pain, deformity, limited movement and strength, joint instability, resulting in significant limitations in daily activities.Many conservative treatments, such as medications, therapeutic exercises, physical therapy, and orthoses, are effective for managing hand OA. For patients who do not respond to conservative treatments, surgical intervention will be necessary.

Read the detailed description

Among physical therapies, in recent years particular interest has been focused on the laser (Light Amplification through the Stimulated Emission of Radiation), which exploits the biological effects induced by electromagnetic emission, consisting of increased mitochondrial oxidation, which facilitates the formation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), increased cellular metabolism, and blood circulation, with rapid absorption of edema and removal of exudates. These actions induce significant anti-inflammatory, proliferative, and analgesic effects on various orthopedic conditions. So far, low-energy lasers have been used in rehabilitative treatments. Currently, there is growing interest in using high-energy lasers, which have a greater ability to penetrate deeply into the tissues and to biostimulate the affected area.The first studies investigating the effects of high-energy laser in this pathology provide interesting results. Medina-Porqueres et al. in 2017 published a study protocol for high-energy laser treatment in rhizarthrosis, which involved randomization to experimental treatment or placebo, but to date the results have not been disclosed. Cantero-Téllez and colleagues (2020) treated 43 patients with rhizarthrosis, randomizing them to an experimental group (high-energy laser) or placebo. They found a remission of pain at the end of high-energy laser treatment, noting, however, that the benefits subsided within 12 weeks. Guo and colleagues (2023) also randomized 42 patients with rhizarthrosis to high-energy laser treatment with occupational therapy guidance or to short-wave treatment and orthosis; their experience has shown that experimental treatment with high-energy laser allowed for improvement in pain and pinch function of the thumb at 12 weeks. The aim of our study is to further investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of high-energy laser treatment in hand osteoarthritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thumb Osteoarthritis
  • Hand Injuries
  • Laser
  • Exercise

Keywords

  • hand
  • rehabilitation
  • conservative
  • lasertherapy
  • exercise
03

In context

Hand Injuries

122 studies on the registry are indexed under Hand Injuries; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 42 is below the median of 55 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Hand Injuries.

Browse Hand Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • arthrosis of the trapezoid-metacarpal with stage 1 or 2 of the Eaton-Littler radiographic classification and pain (recent radiograph within 6 months previously);
  • clinical picture that has been occurring for at least 6 months;
  • pain scored with VAS scale at least 4/10.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • rheumatoid arthritis or outcomes of trauma in the affected area, to treatment with laser therapy (neoplasia, pregnancy, thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, uncompensated heart disease or arrhythmia, pacemaker, local infections),
  • infiltration or physical therapy in the previous 4 weeks.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Intenisity Lasertherapy group

    The high-energy, multimodal laser therapy with thermal control (THEAL) will be administered using an Ixyon XP device (Mectronic, Bergamo, Italy), which allows the delivery of 4 wavelengths (650 nm, 810 nm, 980 nm, and 1064 nm) in continuous and pulsed mode, with an average power of up to 30 W, administering 10 sessions on alternate days.

    Device: THEAL:Ixyon XP (Mectronic, Bergamo, Italy)

  • No intervention
    Exercise group

    Patients will perform exercises for 4 weeks following recruitment. Patients in this group will be taught home exercises to improve the dynamic stability of the thumb metacarpal trapezius joint. The patient is instructed to perform a flexion of the trapeziometacarpal. If the individual is able to complete 10 repetitions with good technique, resistance will be added manually or with rubber bands. If this exercise is painful, they are asked to return to active movement only. Patients in both groups will be instructed to use a brace during the day for 4 weeks following recruitment.

Interventions

  • DeviceTHEAL:Ixyon XP (Mectronic, Bergamo, Italy)

    laser therapy

    Also known as: High Intensity laser therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. recovery of pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

    Time frame: change between baseline to 1 month

  2. recovery of pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

    Time frame: change between baseline to 3 month

  3. recovery of pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

    Time frame: change between baseline to 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. functional recovery

    The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.

    Time frame: change between baseline to 1 month

  2. functional recovery

    The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.

    Time frame: change between baseline to 3 month

  3. functional recovery

    The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.

    Time frame: change between baseline to 6 month

  4. disability recovery

    The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability

    Time frame: change between baseline to 1 month

  5. disability recovery

    The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability

    Time frame: change between baseline to 3 month

  6. disability recovery

    The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability

    Time frame: change between baseline to 6 month

  7. perception of clinical improvement

    Maudsley and Roles scale scores range from 0-4 points for excellent to poor

    Time frame: change between 3 to 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Medina-Porqueres I, Cantero-Tellez R. Class IV laser therapy for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: Study protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2018 Apr;23(2):e1706. doi: 10.1002/pri.1706. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PubMed 29520953 ↗
  • Pisano K, Wolfe T, Lubahn J, Cooney T. Effect of a stabilization exercise program versus standard treatment for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A randomized trial. J Hand Ther. 2023 Jul-Sep;36(3):546-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Jul 8. PubMed 35811182 ↗
  • Moulton MJ, Parentis MA, Kelly MJ, Jacobs C, Naidu SH, Pellegrini VD Jr. Influence of metacarpophalangeal joint position on basal joint-loading in the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 May;83(5):709-16. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00009. PubMed 11379740 ↗
  • Pellegrini VD Jr. Osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;23(1):83-102. PubMed 1729673 ↗
  • Mobargha N, Esplugas M, Garcia-Elias M, Lluch A, Megerle K, Hagert E. The effect of individual isometric muscle loading on the alignment of the base of the thumb metacarpal: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 May;41(4):374-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193415597114. Epub 2015 Aug 6. PubMed 26253421 ↗
  • O'Brien VH, Giveans MR. Effects of a dynamic stability approach in conservative intervention of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a retrospective study. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;26(1):44-51; quiz 52. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 21. PubMed 23177671 ↗
  • Henry KD, Rosemond C, Eckert LB. Effect of number of home exercises on compliance and performance in adults over 65 years of age. Phys Ther. 1999 Mar;79(3):270-7. PubMed 10078770 ↗
  • Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JW, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Hauselmann HJ, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Maheu E, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Sautner J, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Zimmermann-Gorska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Mar;66(3):377-88. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062091. Epub 2006 Oct 17. PubMed 17046965 ↗
  • Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Towheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):465-74. doi: 10.1002/acr.21596. PubMed 22563589 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 25 months after the start.

Of 59 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hand Injuries, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 26. This study's planned 25 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 59 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 27, 2026
First posted
May 5, 2026
StartActual
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2028
Last update
May 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07566507
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 5, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 15, 2026

Study contacts

angela notarnicola
Contact
angela.notarnicola@uniba.it
+393385678124

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion