ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07564518Updated Jun 2, 2026

Application of FreeStyle Libre 2 for Evaluating Glycemic Variability Characteristics in Patients With Extreme Glucose Metabolism Phenotypes

An observational study in Monogenic Diabetes and Hyperinsulinemia, sponsored by Peking University People's Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by Peking University People's Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
120
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cross-sectional study aims to further subdivide diabetes mellitus into more homogeneous subgroups by focusing on extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes, including monogenic diabetes with β cell dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia caused by excessive β cell secretion, and postprandial hypoglycemia phenotypes. By utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology and the FreeStyle Libre 2 glucose monitoring device, this study will evaluate glycemic variability patterns in patients with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes and perform comparative analyses using existing CGM data from healthy populations and patients with type 2 diabetes in our center's database. The study aims to address current gaps in understanding glycemic variability characteristics under extreme β cell functional states, provide novel dynamic monitoring evidence to support early identification, precise classification, and personalized management of these special metabolic states, and simultaneously screen for biomarkers to enable more accurate disease identification, thereby offering potential avenues for improving personalized treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes mellitus is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, affecting individuals regardless of race, sex, or age. Over the past decade, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in China has increased markedly. Statistics indicate that there were 140.9 million adults with diabetes mellitus in China in 2021, and this number is projected to rise to 174.4 million by 2045.

Monogenic diabetes refers to diabetes mellitus caused by mutations in a single gene and accounts for approximately 1%-5% of all diabetes mellitus cases. Monogenic diabetes results from a single pathogenic defect in one of more than 40 genes. Since the type 2 diabetes-like presentation in young individuals was termed maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) by Fajans and characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, understanding of the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity of monogenic diabetes has continued to expand. The main categories of monogenic diabetes include MODY, neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM), and syndromic diabetes. In monogenic diabetes, high-penetrance variants predominantly cause severe impairment of β cell development and insulin secretion, leading to diabetes mellitus independent of other risk factors. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in elucidating the genetic defects underlying monogenic diabetes, improving diagnostic accuracy for rare subtypes, deepening understanding of patients' clinical courses, and contributing to the identification of optimal treatment strategies through precision medicine approaches. However, many aspects of this disease remain insufficiently characterized, including characteristic glycemic profiles and objective, quantifiable indicators applicable to clinical differential diagnosis. Therefore, further research is urgently needed.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multifactorial disease resulting from the combined effects of genetic and environmental factors and accounts for approximately 96% of diabetes mellitus cases worldwide. The pathophysiology of T2DM is characterized by insulin resistance, pancreatic β cell dysfunction, and chronic inflammation. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance may occur several years before the clinical onset of T2DM. Previous studies have demonstrated that more than 75% of individuals in the United States exhibit increased insulin secretion during oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) despite normal glucose clearance. This finding suggests that in a substantial proportion of the population, hyperinsulinemia may represent the earliest warning signal of metabolic disease risk, even in the presence of normal glucose tolerance. Targeted lifestyle interventions aimed at hyperinsulinemia, such as increased resistance training, nutritional strategies, and improved sleep, have been shown to produce immediate and sustained improvements in insulin resistance. However, within this gray zone spanning the progression from normal glucose tolerance to overt diabetes mellitus, characteristic glycemic profiles have not yet been clearly defined. Therefore, exploring glycemic variability characteristics is essential for elucidating the onset and progression of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as for enabling early intervention.

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), as the most widely used diagnostic gold standard for assessing glycemic characteristics, employs a standardized 75 g glucose load to evaluate early-phase and second-phase β cell secretory capacity following glucose stimulation. As an artificially constructed experimental simulation, OGTT does not reflect daily physiological conditions and can capture only short-term, single-day glycemic variability, thus failing to represent true blood glucose trajectories. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can dynamically and continuously reflect interstitial fluid glucose levels in real time, providing critical information on the amplitude, frequency, and patterns of glycemic variability that cannot be obtained through traditional point blood glucose testing. CGM has become animportant tool for refined diabetes mellitus management. This technology provides technical support for delineating characteristic glycemic variability patterns under different insulin secretion states.

Accordingly, this study will use CGM to objectively and quantitatively compare glycemic variability parameters and patterns among four groups: patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes versus patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hyperinsulinemia versus healthy controls. This approach will reveal the effects of extreme β cell function on diurnal glycemic variability patterns and characterize distinctive dynamic glycemic profiles. In addition, this study will screen for biomarkers to facilitate early identification, diagnosis, and treatment of this specific type of diabetes mellitus, while simultaneously deepening understanding of glycemic characteristics in the early stages of insulin resistance and providing a theoretical basis for subsequent precise prevention and intervention.

Primary study objective: To evaluate glycemic variability patterns in patients with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes, including β-MND, hyperinsulinemia, and postprandial hypoglycemia phenotypes.

Secondary study objective:

  1. To assess differences in blood glucose profiles between individuals with extreme glucose metabolism phenotypes and healthy populations, as well as patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), particularly among comparable T2DM subgroups.
  2. To screen for biomarkers that enable more accurate identification of this disease.
02

Conditions studied

  • Monogenic Diabetes
  • Hyperinsulinemia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperinsulinism

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperinsulinism; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 90 across 18 observational studies indexed under Hyperinsulinism.

Browse Hyperinsulinism studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University People's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 609 studies on the registry; 247 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

this study will use CGM to objectively and quantitatively compare glycemic variability parameters and patterns among four groups: patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes versus patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hyperinsulinemia versus healthy controls. This approach will reveal the effects of extreme β cell function on diurnal glycemic variability patterns and characterize distinctive dynamic glycemic profiles.

60 patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes and 60 patients with hyperinsulinemia and normal glucose tolerance who meet the inclusion criteria outlined will be recruited from the endocrinology outpatient clinic of our hospital.

Groups A1 and A2, as well as Groups B1 and B2, will be matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, and BMI. In addition, Groups A1 and A2 will be matched at a 1:1 ratio by HbA1c.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Group A1:

    • Age ≥ 18 years;
    • Patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes confirmed by DNA sequencing or other diagnostic testing.
    1. Group A2:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Patients with confirmed type 2 diabetes mellitus;
      • Derived from this center's existing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) database.
    2. Group B1:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Normal fasting plasma glucose (≥ 3.6 and \< 6.1 mmol/L) and normal 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT (≥ 3 and \< 7.8 mmol/L);
      • Fasting insulin ≥ 25 µU/mL and/or 2-hour insulin during OGTT greater than 10 times the fasting insulin level.
    3. Group B2:

      • Age ≥ 18 years;
      • Normal glucose tolerance meeting the 2024 ADA criteria: fasting plasma glucose \< 5.6 mmol/L, 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT \< 7.8 mmol/L;
      • According to laboratory reference standards, fasting insulin ≥ 2.6 and \< 25 µU/mL, and 2-hour insulin during OGTT 5-10 times the fasting insulin level.
      • Derived from this center's existing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) database.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Neonates younger than 4 months of age (congenital diabetes);

    1. Pregnancy;
    2. Patients with positive pancreatic autoantibody test results;
    3. Patients with severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, hepatic disease, or renal disease;
    4. Patients who have participated in other clinical trials.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group A : diabetes mellitus group

    Group A1 (patients with β cell dysfunction monogenic diabetes): 60 cases; Group A2 (patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus): 60 cases

  • Group B : normal glucose tolerance group

    Group B1 (normal glucose tolerance with fasting / postprandial hyperinsulinemia): 60 cases; Group B2 (normal glucose tolerance with normal insulin levels): 60 cases

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. mean blood glucose in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  2. glucose management indicator (GMI) in %

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  3. highest glucose values in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  4. lowest glucose values in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  5. coefficient of variation (CV)

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  6. mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  7. standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  8. mean of daily differences (MODD) in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  9. average daily risk range (ADRR)

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  10. largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE) in mmol/L

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  11. high blood glucose index (HBGI)

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  12. low blood glucose index (LBGI)

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  13. time in range (TIR) in %

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  14. time above range (TAR) in %

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

  15. time below range (TBR) in %

    glycemic variability data

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, patients wil wear a CGM for 14 days after enrollment, and will not wear it afterwards.

Secondary outcomes

  1. weight in kilograms

    weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.

  2. height in meters

    weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2

    Time frame: The study is a cross-sectional study, and the above indicators were measured only once at the initial enrollment.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 7 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2026
First posted
May 4, 2026
StartEst.
May 25, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 25, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 9, 2027
Last update
Jun 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07564518
Responsible party
Ren qian (Chief Physician,Professor, Peking University People's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2026
Start date
May 25, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 25, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 9, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Qian Ren, Doctorate
Contact
qianren_xuan@126.com
010-88324371
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion