ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07559630STRATOSUpdated Jul 10, 2026

Rectal Arterial Embolization vs Band Ligation for the Treatment of Internal hemOrrhoidS

An interventional study of Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization and Rubber Band Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Bleeding, Hemorrhoids, Internal and HAE, sponsored by Jessica K. Stewart, MD. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Jessica K. Stewart, MD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare two standard of care non-surgical treatments for hemorrhoidal bleeding: hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) versus rubber band ligation (RBL). Directly comparing these two methods may help to clarify which treatment is better for controlling hemorrhoidal bleeding, reducing symptoms, and improving patients' quality of life.

HAE is a standard minimally invasive procedure to put tiny particles or coils into the blood vessel that feeds a hemorrhoid to block the blood flow (embolization). This involves using a catheter inserted into an artery, using twilight (conscious) sedation.

RBL is a standard procedure that involves using small rubber bands around the base of the hemorrhoids to cut off blood flow, causing it to shrink or shrivel.

Read the detailed description

A single center, prospective, open-label, double arm, randomized trial to compare rates of control of bleeding from hemorrhoids, during prospective follow-up in patients with internal hemorrhoids undergoing hemorrhoidal artery embolization (HAE) versus rubber band ligation (RBL), and the number of procedures needed for hemostasis.

Subjects will be considered enrolled in the study once they have provided informed consent. They will then be randomized to one of two arms after completion of the in-person screening visit. Subjects may proceed to the procedure visit after they have met all screening eligibility criteria.

The study will involve a screening period in which patient eligibility is determined. Once eligibility is confirmed, subjects will then be randomized to HAE or RBL in a 1:1 ratio. A total of 40 subjects will be enrolled in the study and followed for a duration of up to 18 months. All study subjects will undergo the initial procedures, consisting of a physical exam, vital signs, medical history, review of medications, laboratory blood evaluations, anascopy, and completion of completion of the hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS), the short health scale for hemorrhoidal disease (SHSHD), French bleeding score (FBS), and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score questionnaires.

After treatment follow-up visits will be at 1 week (7 days ± 2 days), 1 month (4 weeks ± 1 week), retreatment (as needed), 2 months (8 weeks ± 2 weeks), 3 months (12 weeks ± 2 weeks), 6 months (24 weeks ± 2 weeks), and 12 months (52 weeks ± 4 weeks) post-procedure. At these visits, subjects will complete all or some of the following: completion of the HDSS, SHSHD, FBS, VAS, and treatment satisfaction questionnaires, review current medications, undergo a directed physical examination, complete laboratory evaluations, anoscopy, CTA abdomen/ pelvis imaging, and report any new adverse events (AEs).

At 6 months, subjects will have the option to crossover because of continued bleeding. Subjects in the crossover group will undergo treatment with the other treatment modality, with follow up at 1 week (7 days ± 2 days), 1 month (4 weeks ± 1 week), retreatment (as needed), 2 months (8 weeks ± 2 weeks), 3 months (12 weeks ± 2 weeks), 6 months (24 weeks ± 2 weeks), and 12 months (52 weeks ± 4 weeks).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemorrhoidal Bleeding
  • Hemorrhoids, Internal
  • HAE
  • RBL

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemorrhoids

238 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhoids; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 183 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhoids.

Browse Hemorrhoids studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jessica K. Stewart, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years and less than 90 years.
  2. Ability to provide written .
  3. Documented clinical history of chronic bleeding from internal hemorrhoids.
  4. Documented presence of Goligher grade II-III internal hemorrhoids.
  5. Failed conservative treatment for bleeding hemorrhoids (e.g. fiber supplementation, topical ointments and creams, dietary modifications, stool softeners, warm baths).
  6. Able to comply with all treatments and protocol follow-up visits, in the opinion of the PI's.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Moderate loss of kidney function, defined as estimated of less than 45 mL/min.
  2. Significant arterial atherosclerosis that would limit selective angiography.
  3. Known alternative causes of GI bleeding.
  4. Allergy to iodinated contrast agents.
  5. Active infection or .
  6. Pregnancy.
  7. Active nicotine use within the last 12 months.
  8. Portal hypertension/rectal varices.
  9. Uncorrectable coagulopathy ( > 2; count \<100,000; PTT > 40 sec).
  10. Findings on baseline CTA that adversely affect treatment, based on PI's clinical judgment, including but not limited to stenosis, occlusion, or hypoplasia of the superior and/or middle rectal arteries.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization

    Involves using a catheter inserted into an artery to put tiny particles or coils into the blood vessel that feeds the hemorrhoid to block the blood flow and shrink it.

    Device: Hemorrhoidal Artery Embolization

  • Active comparator
    Rubber Band Ligation

    Involves using a band to cut off blood flow to the hemorrhoid and shrink it.

    Procedure: Rubber Band Ligation

Interventions

  • DeviceHemorrhoidal Artery Embolization

    Involves using a catheter inserted into an artery to put tiny particles or coils into the blood vessel that feeds the hemorrhoid to block the blood flow and shrink it.

  • ProcedureRubber Band Ligation

    Involves using a band to cut off blood flow to the hemorrhoid and shrink it.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of procedures to control bleeding

    To compare rates of control of bleeding from hemorrhoids, based on number of procedures needed for hemostasis, during prospective follow-up in patients with internal hemorrhoids undergoing arterial embolization versus rubber band ligation.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rates

    Number of complications post procedure for each complication type (such as severe pain, thrombosis, or severe bleeding).

    Time frame: 0-18 months

  2. Time to control bleeding

    Number of weeks to control bleeding post procedure

    Time frame: 0-18 months

  3. Severe adverse events

    Number of unscheduled ER visits or hospitalization for severe complications.

    Time frame: 0-18 months

  4. Patient treatment satisfaction

    Treatment satisfaction questionnaire

    Time frame: 0-18 months

  5. Number of crossovers

    Number of subjects who crossover from rubber band ligation to HAE, or vice versa at 6-months post procedure due to continued bleeding.

    Time frame: 0-6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yan Z, Gui Y, Liu C, Zhang X, Wen C, Olatunji OJ, Suttikhana I, Ashaolu TJ. Gastrointestinal digestion of food proteins: Anticancer, antihypertensive, anti-obesity, and immunomodulatory mechanisms of the derived peptides. Food Res Int. 2024 Aug;189:114573. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114573. Epub 2024 May 28. PubMed 38876600 ↗
  • Watanabe N, Hirose M, Hasegawa A, Mochida K, Ogura A, Inoue K. Derivation of embryonic stem cells from wild-derived mouse strains by nuclear transfer using peripheral blood cells. Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 10;13(1):11175. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38341-0. PubMed 37430017 ↗
  • Douek M. Radiofrequency Ablation of Solid, Non-Functional Thyroid Nodules. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Jun;25(2):100821. doi: 10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100821. Epub 2022 Mar 15. No abstract available. PubMed 35551805 ↗
  • Talaie R, Torkian P, Moghadam AD, Tradi F, Vidal V, Sapoval M, Golzarian J. Hemorrhoid embolization: A review of current evidences. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Jan;103(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PubMed 34456172 ↗
  • Lohsiriwat V. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 May 7;18(17):2009-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2009. PubMed 22563187 ↗
  • Panneau J, Mege D, Di Bisceglie M, Duclos J, Habert P, Bartoli A, Vidal V, Tradi F. Rectal Artery Embolization for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Anatomy, Evaluation, and Treatment Techniques. Radiographics. 2022 Oct;42(6):1829-1844. doi: 10.1148/rg.220014. PubMed 36190848 ↗
  • Sandler RS, Peery AF. Rethinking What We Know About Hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 27. PubMed 29601902 ↗
  • Jutabha R, Jensen DM, Chavalitdhamrong D. Randomized prospective study of endoscopic rubber band ligation compared with bipolar coagulation for chronically bleeding internal hemorrhoids. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug;104(8):2057-64. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.292. Epub 2009 Jun 9. PubMed 19513028 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07559630
Lead sponsor
Jessica K. Stewart, MD
Responsible party
Jessica K. Stewart, MD (Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2026
Start date
May 19, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Aniket Joglekar, MD
Contact
ajoglekar@mednet.ucla.edu
310-948-8026
Saima Chaabane, PhD
Contact
SChaabane@mednet.ucla.edu
424-465-4482
Jessica Stewart, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles
Dennis Jensen, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion