CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07554391OBSvsASCUpdated Apr 28, 2026

To Analyze the Economics of Office-based (OBS) Versus Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC)-Based Cataract Surgery.

An observational study in Cataract, sponsored by Rush Eye Associates. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-28.

Sponsored by Rush Eye Associates · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
76
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To analyze the economics of office-based (OBS) versus ambulatory surgery center (ASC)-based cataract surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study was conducted as a randomized, controlled clinical trial at a single private practice institution. Patients presenting for routine cataract surgery scheduling were randomized prospectively to undergo the procedure in either the OBS or ASC-based setting. The primary outcome was total average cost for performing OBS versus ASC-based cataract surgery. The secondary outcome was total average facility reimbursement for OBS versus ASC-based cataract surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • office based surgery
  • ambulatory surgery center
  • economics
  • cataract
03

In context

Cataract

1,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is close to the median of 81 across 484 observational studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

Rush Eye Associates is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Visually significant cataract

Inclusion criteria

  • Selected for routine cataract surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complex surgery
  • Certain systemic comorbidities
  • Limited mobility
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Office based cataract surgery

    Procedure: Office based surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureOffice based surgery

    Study subjects underwent office-based cataract surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost

    Average cost for office based surgery

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Average cost for office-based surgery

    US dollars

    Time frame: Single surgical event

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rush Eye
    Amarillo, Texas 79109, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07554391
Lead sponsor
Rush Eye Associates
Responsible party
Sloan W. Rush, MD (Physician, Rush Eye Associates) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 28, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2025
Completion
Aug 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion