ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07547371Updated Apr 23, 2026

Effectiveness of Aromatherapy and Digital Anesthesia in Managing Dental Anxiety and Pain in Children

An interventional study of Traditional Local Anesthesia (Conventional Syringe) and Aromatherapy (Lavender or Orange Essential Oil) in Pain, Dental Anxiety and Tooth Extraction, sponsored by Arzu Pınar Erdem. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by Arzu Pınar Erdem · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2025, registered Apr 2026).
  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical study is to learn whether aromatherapy and digital anesthesia are effective in reducing dental anxiety and pain during tooth extraction in children. The study also aims to understand how these methods influence children's comfort and cooperation during treatment.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Do aromatherapy (lavender and orange essential oils) and digital anesthesia reduce dental anxiety and pain during tooth extraction in children?

Are these methods more comfortable and less stressful for pediatric patients compared to traditional anesthesia techniques?

Does digital anesthesia improve cooperation and ease of management during dental treatment?

Researchers will compare aromatherapy and digital anesthesia with conventional anesthesia methods to determine whether these techniques make the extraction process easier and more comfortable for children.

Participants will:

Receive either aromatherapy, digital anesthesia, conventional anesthesia, or a combination depending on the study group

Undergo tooth extraction under controlled clinical conditions

Be evaluated before, during, and after treatment using standardized pain and anxiety scales

Provide post-treatment feedback along with their parents regarding comfort and anxiety levels

This study may help identify gentler and more child-friendly approaches to managing anxiety and pain during pediatric dental procedures.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical study will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. The study population will consist of children aged 6-12 years who require extraction of a mandibular primary molar and meet the eligibility criteria. The study will be initiated following ethical approval, and informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians prior to participation.

A total of 132 participants will be randomly allocated into four equal groups using a computer-generated randomization method or sealed opaque envelopes.

In Group 1, tooth extraction will be performed under conventional infiltration anesthesia. In Group 2, anesthesia will be administered using a computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia system (SleeperOne® 5). In Group 3, aromatherapy will be applied prior to conventional anesthesia, while in Group 4, aromatherapy will be combined with computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia.

Aromatherapy will be administered via inhalation using an ultrasonic diffuser containing a mixture of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) essential oils diluted in distilled water. The diffuser will be activated prior to the procedure to allow sufficient dispersion of the aroma in the clinical environment. Participants assigned to aromatherapy groups will undergo a short inhalation period followed by a standardized waiting period before anesthesia administration.

All participants will receive a standardized behavioral management approach using the Tell-Show-Do technique. Prior to anesthesia administration, topical anesthetic will be applied to the dried mucosa.

In the conventional anesthesia groups, local infiltration anesthesia will be administered using a standard dental syringe. In the digital anesthesia groups, intraosseous anesthesia will be performed using the SleeperOne® system in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, including mucosal anesthesia, bone penetration, and controlled delivery of the anesthetic solution.

All patients will receive 4% articaine hydrochloride with epinephrine as the local anesthetic agent. Adequate anesthesia will be confirmed prior to extraction, and all procedures will be performed under standardized clinical conditions with minimal surgical trauma.

Pain and anxiety will be assessed using validated pediatric scales at predefined stages of the procedure. Self-reported pain will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale (WBS), and behavioral pain will be assessed using the FLACC scale. Anxiety levels will be measured using the Facial Image Scale (FIS).

Assessments will be conducted at the following time points: before the procedure (baseline), after aromatherapy application (for Groups 3 and 4), during local anesthesia administration, immediately after anesthesia, during tooth extraction, and after the extraction procedure.

Physiological parameters, including heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO₂), systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure, will be recorded at the same time points to evaluate the physiological stress response associated with each intervention.

The study is designed to determine whether computer-controlled anesthesia and/or aromatherapy can improve pain control, reduce dental anxiety, and stabilize physiological stress responses in children undergoing dental extraction procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Dental Anxiety
  • Tooth Extraction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dental anxiety
  • Dental pain
  • Primary molar extraction
  • Aromatherapy
  • Computer-controlled anesthesia
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 132 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Arzu Pınar Erdem as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants will be recruited from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry who meet the following criteria:

Children aged 6-12 years,

Indicated for extraction of a mandibular primary molar without acute infection or abscess,

No use of analgesic or sedative medications within the previous 24 hours,

Absence of any systemic disease,

Behavior rated as Category 2, 3, or 4 on the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale,

Voluntary agreement to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Children with a history of systemic disease or those taking medications on a regular basis,

Known allergy to local anesthetic agents or essential oils,

Use of analgesic or sedative medications within the previous 24 hours,

Children with asthma, (COPD), upper respiratory tract infections, or any respiratory condition that may increase sensitivity to inhalational therapies,

Children rated as Category 1 on the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale, indicating an inability to cooperate,

Teeth indicated for extraction due to acute infection or abscess,

Patients with teeth presenting mobility, ankylosis, or root resorption exceeding one-third of the root length.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
132 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Anesthesia

    Infiltration anesthesia using conventional syringe prior to tooth extraction.

    Drug: Traditional Local Anesthesia (Conventional Syringe)

  • Experimental
    Aromatherapy + Conventional Anesthesia

    Aromatherapy via inhalation (lavender + orange oil) using diffuser prior to extraction Followed by conventional anesthesia

    Other: Aromatherapy (Lavender or Orange Essential Oil)

  • Experimental
    Digital Anesthesia Group (SleeperOne 5)

    Participants will not receive aromatherapy. Local anesthesia will be administered using the SleeperOne 5 computerized digital anesthesia system, which regulates injection pressure and flow rate through its resistance analysis technology.

    Device: Digital Local Anesthesia (SleeperOne 5)

  • Experimental
    Combination Group (Aromatherapy + Digital Local Anesthesia)

    Participants in this group will receive both aromatherapy (lavender or orange essential oil) and digital local anesthesia delivered via the SleeperOne 5 device.

    Other: Aromatherapy (Lavender or Orange Essential Oil) · Device: Digital Local Anesthesia (SleeperOne 5)

Interventions

  • DrugTraditional Local Anesthesia (Conventional Syringe)

    Local anesthesia will be administered using a conventional dental syringe with a standard injection technique. No computerized delivery system will be used.

    Also known as: Standard syringe anesthesia

  • OtherAromatherapy (Lavender or Orange Essential Oil)

    Participants will receive inhalational aromatherapy using lavender or orange essential oil prior to the dental procedure.

    Also known as: Inhalational aromatherapy

  • DeviceDigital Local Anesthesia (SleeperOne 5)

    Local anesthesia will be administered using the SleeperOne 5 computerized anesthesia delivery device (Dentalhitec, France).

    Also known as: Computer-controlled local anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBS)

    Pain will be assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (0-10). The scale consists of six facial expressions corresponding to scores of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain possible." Children will be asked to select the face that best represents their pain intensity during local anesthesia injection. Higher scores indicate greater perceived pain.

    Time frame: Immediately after local anesthesia administration ant after tooth extraction

  2. FLACC Scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability): (behavioral assessment)

    Behavioral pain will be assessed using the FLACC scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability; total score range 0-10). Each of the five categories is scored from 0 to 2, with a total score calculated by summing all categories. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 1-3 mild discomfort, 4-6 moderate pain, and 7-10 severe pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain-related behavioral distress during local anesthesia injection.

    Time frame: During local anesthesia injection and tooth extraction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Facial Image Scale (FIS) for assessment of dental anxiety

    Anxiety will be assessed using the Facial Image Scale (FIS), a validated visual self-report measure designed for pediatric patients. The scale consists of five facial expressions representing increasing levels of anxiety, scored from 1 to 5. A score of 1 indicates no anxiety, while a score of 5 indicates very high anxiety. Children will be asked to select the face that best represents how they feel at the time of assessment. Higher scores indicate greater levels of dental anxiety.

    Time frame: At predefined time points: before the procedure (baseline), after aromatherapy (when applicable), immediately after local anesthesia, and immediately after tooth extraction

  2. Heart rate during dental procedure

    Heart rate (beats per minute) will be measured using a pulse oximeter at predefined procedural time points. Higher values indicate increased physiological stress response.

    Time frame: At predefined time points: before the procedure (baseline), after aromatherapy (when applicable), during local anesthesia administration, immediately after anesthesia, during tooth extraction, and immediately after extraction

  3. Oxygen saturation (SpO₂) during dental procedure

    Oxygen saturation (%) will be measured using a pulse oximeter. Lower values may indicate altered respiratory patterns or stress-related physiological response.

    Time frame: At predefined time points: before the procedure (baseline), after aromatherapy (when applicable), during local anesthesia administration, immediately after anesthesia, during tooth extraction, and immediately after extraction

  4. Systolic blood pressure during dental procedure

    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) will be measured using a non-invasive blood pressure monitor. Higher values indicate increased physiological stress response.

    Time frame: At predefined time points: before the procedure (baseline), after aromatherapy (when applicable), during local anesthesia administration, immediately after anesthesia, during tooth extraction, and immediately after extraction

  5. Diastolic blood pressure during dental procedure

    Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) will be measured using a non-invasive blood pressure monitor. Higher values indicate increased physiological stress response.

    Time frame: At predefined time points: before the procedure (baseline), after aromatherapy (when applicable), during local anesthesia administration, immediately after anesthesia, during tooth extraction, and immediately after extraction

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Anil O, Keskin G. Comparison of computer controlled local anesthetic delivery and traditional injection regarding disruptive behaviour, pain, anxiety and biochemical parameters: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;48(1):120-127. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.046. Epub 2024 Jan 3. PubMed 38239164 ↗
  • Arslan I, Aydinoglu S, Karan NB. Can lavender oil inhalation help to overcome dental anxiety and pain in children? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;179(6):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03595-7. Epub 2020 Feb 6. PubMed 32030454 ↗
  • Vitale MC, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, Alcozer R, Ciuffreda C, Scribante A. Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jan;47(1):82-90. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.002. Epub 2023 Jan 3. PubMed 36627224 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 5 months after the start.

Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2026
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
StartActual
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 4, 2026
Last update
Apr 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07547371
Lead sponsor
Arzu Pınar Erdem
Collaborators
Bilimsel Araştirma Projeleri Birimi, Istanbul Üniversitesi
Responsible party
Arzu Pınar Erdem (Professor, Istanbul University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 23, 2026
Start date
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 4, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Arzu Pınar Erdem, professor
Contact
apinar@istanbul.edu.tr
+90 532 543 14 53
Yonca Bircan Erçin
Contact
ybnrcn_2000@hotmail.com
+90 543 599 04 94

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion