CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07546097Updated Jun 15, 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis(UPFRONT)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Upadacitinib and Corticosteroid in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis, sponsored by Yongquan Shi. Recruiting at 4 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.

Sponsored by Yongquan Shi · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn comparative effectiveness and safety of Upadacitinib vs Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Whether upadacitinib can effectively induce remission in acute severe ulcerative colitis with an efficacy non-inferior to that of corticosteroids.
  2. What adverse reactions may occur with upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis?

Researchers will compare upadacitinib with corticosteroids to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis.Participants will:

  1. Upadacitinib group: Upadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then adjusted to 30 mg once daily.
  2. Corticosteroid group: Methylprednisolone for injection 60 mg/day. If clinical response is achieved, switch to oral prednisone acetate tablets after 5 days (calculated at 0.75 mg/kg/day), followed by a weekly prednisone taper of 5 mg. When the dose is reduced to 20 mg, taper by 2.5 mg weekly until discontinued, with mesalazine 4 g/day as maintenance therapy.
  3. Take drug Upadacitinib or Corticosteroid every day for 3 months
  4. Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests
  5. Record the patient's bowel movements and the presence of symptoms such as abdominal pain, while performing colonoscopy, ultrasound examination, and blood tests at the specified time points.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

  • acute severe ulcerative colitis
  • Upadacitinib
  • Corticosteroids
  • First-Line Therapy
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with ASUC
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • No gender restriction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of contraindications, allergy, or intolerance to upadacitinib or glucocorticoids.
  • Patients requiring immediate colectomy; diagnosis of Crohn's disease; confirmed intestinal infection; hemodynamic instability; clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection; current malignancy.
  • Presence of severe underlying systemic diseases involving the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, hematologic system, or other organ systems.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Unwilling to participate in the clinical study.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Upadacitinib group

    Upadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then adjusted to 30 mg once daily.

    Drug: Upadacitinib

  • Active comparator
    Corticosteroid group

    Methylprednisolone for injection 60 mg/day. If clinical response is achieved, switch to oral prednisone acetate tablets after 5 days (calculated at 0.75 mg/kg/day), followed by a weekly prednisone taper of 5 mg. When the dose is reduced to 20 mg, taper by 2.5 mg weekly until discontinued, with mesalazine 4 g/day as maintenance therapy.

    Drug: Corticosteroid

Interventions

  • DrugUpadacitinib

    Safety and efficacy of the drug

  • DrugCorticosteroid

    Safety and efficacy of the drug

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome Measure

    clinical response by day 7 (defined as a reduction in Lichtiger score to \<10 points with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day).

    Time frame: The primary outcome was assessed by the investigator between days 3 and 7, with patients recorded as clinical responders if they had the primary outcome on any day in this assessment window.

Secondary outcomes

  1. clinical response by day 14

    Defined as mayo score decrease of ≥30% and ≥3 points from baseline, accompanied by a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.

    Time frame: day 14

  2. clinical remission by day 28, day 42, and day 90

    Total Mayo score ≤2 points and no individual subscore \>1 point.

    Time frame: day 28, day 42, and day 90

  3. Endoscopic response by day 90

    A decrease in MES score of ≥1 point, or a decrease of ≥50% from baseline.

    Time frame: day 90

  4. Endoscopic remission by day 90

    MES score ≤1

    Time frame: day 90

  5. Endoscopic+clinical response

    Partial Mayo score ≤1 and MES ≤1

    Time frame: day 90

  6. Clinical +FcP remission

    Partial Mayo score ≤1 and FcP≤250mg/kg

    Time frame: day 90

  7. Clinical +CRP remission

    Partial Mayo score ≤1 and CRP≤5mg/L

    Time frame: day 90

  8. Histologic remission

    typically defined as the absence of signs of neutrophilic infiltration. The specific criterion is a score below 2B.0, i.e., no increased neutrophils in the lamina propria.

    Time frame: day 90

  9. Histologic improvement

    when assessing treatment efficacy, a score ≤ 3.1 (intraepithelial neutrophilic infiltration involving \< 50% of crypts) is used as the threshold for histologic improvement.

    Time frame: day 90

  10. Adverse Reactions

    Adverse Reactions

    Time frame: day 90

  11. IBDQ and fatigue questionnaire scores

    IBDQ and fatigue questionnaire scores

    Time frame: day 0 and day 90

06

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Ankang Central Hospital
    Ankang, Shaanxi 710005, China
    Recruiting
  • 3201 Hospital
    Hanzhong, Shaanxi 710005, China
    Recruiting
  • Xijing Hospital
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710005, China
    Recruiting
  • Shaanxi Provincial Nuclear Industry 215 Hospital
    Xianyang, Shaanxi 710005, China
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • D'Haens G, Lemmens L, Geboes K, Vandeputte L, Van Acker F, Mortelmans L, Peeters M, Vermeire S, Penninckx F, Nevens F, Hiele M, Rutgeerts P. Intravenous cyclosporine versus intravenous corticosteroids as single therapy for severe attacks of ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2001 May;120(6):1323-9. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.23983. PubMed 11313301 ↗
  • Choy MC, Li Wai Suen CFD, Con D, Boyd K, Pena R, Burrell K, Rosella O, Proud D, Brouwer R, Gorelik A, Liew D, Connell WR, Wright EK, Taylor KM, Pudipeddi A, Sawers M, Christensen B, Ng W, Begun J, Radford-Smith G, Garg M, Martin N, van Langenberg DR, Ding NS, Beswick L, Leong RW, Sparrow MP, De Cruz P. Intensified versus standard dose infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (PREDICT-UC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Nov;9(11):981-996. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00200-0. Epub 2024 Sep 2. PubMed 39236736 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07546097
Lead sponsor
Yongquan Shi
Responsible party
Yongquan Shi (Professor, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2026
Start date
Mar 23, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2026

Study contacts

Yongquan Shi
Contact
von15991351319@163.com
+8602984771535

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion