CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07535450Updated Sep 16, 2026

Pre-anaesthesia Reviews in Denmark - Status of a Person-centred Approach

An observational study in Anesthesia, sponsored by Gødstrup Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Gødstrup Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about current pre-anaesthesia practices in Denmark and patients' experiences of pre-anaesthesia consultations as well as what matters to patients before anaesthesia.

The questions the study aims to answer are:

What are the current pre-anaesthesia practices in Danish public hospitals. How do patients experience pre-anaesthesia consultations in Danish public hospitals.

What matters to patients before anaesthesia in Danish public hospitals.

On the day of surgery, patients answer an online survey about what matters to them when undergoing anaesthesia and whether they spoke with an anaesthesiologist or nurse anaesthetist about the anaesthesia.

Data from the medical chart are obtained to support patients responses. For patients receiving a pre-anaesthesia consultation, we will summarise the degree of person-centredness experienced by patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Person-centredness
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Gødstrup Hospital is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing surgery at public hospitals throughout Denmark regardless hospital type (regional versus university hospital), low-income or high-income areas, rural versus urban areas. Thus the study population is representative of the Danish speaking population.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients, who can read/write Danish and can give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,400 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • In person pre-anaesthesia assessment

    Patients who speak with an anaesthesiologist or nurse anaesthetist about the anaesthesia either face-to-face, telephone based, video based

  • Remote pre-anaesthesia assessment

    No contact between patient and an anaesthesiologist or nurse anaesthetist about the anaesthesia (anaesthesiologist or nurse anaesthetist's review of medical charts only).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. What matters to you when undergoing anaesthesia?

    Open responses to the question about what matters to the patient before anaesthesia. Will be analysed using content analysis focusing on the manifest content rather than the latent content.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Pre anaesthesia consultation

    Descriptive data on how many patients had a pre anaesthesia consultation. Response options: Yes, no, don't know.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Person-centred pre-anaesthesia practice

    Patients who had a pre-anaesthesia consultation answer four questions from the subsection "Working with patients' beliefs and values" on the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Care (PCPI-C). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree, disagree, bneutral, agree to strongly agree. The subscale score is calculated as an average of the four items. There are no reverse scoring items. A higher score indicates that patients perceive a higher quality of person-centred care, characterized by stronger alignment with their values, shared decision-making, and authentic relationships with staff. The "Working with patients' beliefs and values" subsection consists of the follwoing questions: "Staff make an effort to understand what is important to me" "I feel able to say to staff what is important to me" "I feel able to give staff feedback about my experience of being cared for" "In caring for me, staff use what they know about me as a person"

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Patients' experiences of pre-anaesthesia consultations

    Qualitative study with semi-structured individual telephone-interviews using a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Educational level

    Categorized data where patients mark their highest level of education. Data will be presented descriptively.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Employment status

    Categorical data. Patients mark their employment status. Data will be presented descriptively.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification

    Data on ASA classification will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation)

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Pre-anaesthesia assessment

    Data on pre-anaesthesia assessment practices: face-to-face, telephone based, video based, administrative (review of medical charts only), other, as well as date of assessment and done by professional group (anaesthesiologist, nurse anaesthetist, or other). Data will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation)

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Planned type of anaesthesia

    Type: general, regional, epidural/spinal, sedation, local analgesia. Data will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Surgical intervention

    Data will be obtained from medicial journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation)

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Duration of surgery

    Data will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation)

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Cardiac/non-cardiac conditions

    Data will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation)

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Cancer/non-cancer conditions

    Data will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia conditions)

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Admission type: ambulatory/non-ambulatory

    Data will be obtained from medical journals and described as crude numbers and percentages and by group (pre-anaesthesia consultation versus no pre-anaesthesia consultation)

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Response rate

    A response rate will be calculated based on the total number of eligible patients and the number of responses to the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Rigshospitalet
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
  • Gødstrup Hospital
    Herning, 7400, Denmark
  • Horsens Regional Hospital
    Horsens, 8700, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07535450
Lead sponsor
Gødstrup Hospital
Collaborators
Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg University Hospital, Regionshospitalet Horsens, Odense University Hospital, Zealand University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 4, 2026
Completion
Sep 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion