CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07533279Updated Apr 16, 2026

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Analgesia in Open Cholecystectomy

An interventional study of Erector Spinae Plane Block and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block in Cholecystectomy, Postoperative Pain and Erector Spinae Plane Block, sponsored by Sohag University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-16.

Sponsored by Sohag University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus bilateral external oblique intercostal plane (EOI) block in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy.

Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups to receive either ESPB or EOI block in addition to standard general anesthesia. The primary outcome is postoperative pain score assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 2 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nalbuphine requirements, time to first analgesic request, and hemodynamic changes.

This study seeks to determine the more effective regional anesthesia technique for improving perioperative analgesia in open cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Open cholecystectomy is still indicated in selected patients such as those with complicated gallbladder disease or contraindications to laparoscopy. Effective perioperative pain management is essential to improve patient outcomes and reduce opioid consumption.

Regional anesthesia techniques have gained increasing interest, particularly with the use of ultrasound guidance. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively simple and widely used interfascial block that provides effective analgesia for abdominal surgeries. The external oblique intercostal plane (EOI) block is a newer technique targeting the upper abdominal wall.

In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, adult patients undergoing elective open cholecystectomy will be randomized into two groups. One group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB, while the other group will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided EOI block, both performed after induction of general anesthesia and before surgical incision.

All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia. Pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at multiple time points postoperatively. Rescue analgesia with intravenous nalbuphine will be administered as needed.

The primary outcome is postoperative pain score at 2 hours. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative fentanyl consumption, total nalbuphine consumption over 24 hours, time to first analgesic request, hemodynamic parameters, and any block-related complications.

This study aims to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of ESPB and EOI block in open cholecystectomy surgeries.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Regional Anesthesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 66 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Sohag University is the lead sponsor of 1,183 studies on the registry; 612 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18-65 years.
  • Patients scheduled for elective open cholecystectomy.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Patients who provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy.
  • Infection at the site of injection.
  • Severe hepatic, renal, or cardiac disease.
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m².
  • Pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Erector Spinae Plane Block Group

    Participants in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane block using local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia following open cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block

  • Experimental
    External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Group

    Participants in this group will receive bilateral external oblique intercostal plane block using local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia following open cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureErector Spinae Plane Block

    Bilateral erector spinae plane block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using local anesthetic prior to surgical incision to provide postoperative analgesia.

  • ProcedureExternal Oblique Intercostal Plane Block

    Bilateral external oblique intercostal plane block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using local anesthetic prior to surgical incision to provide postoperative analgesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement.

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Opioid Consumption

    Total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery measured in morphine equivalents.

    Time frame: First 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Time to First Analgesic Request

    Time elapsed from the end of surgery to the first request for analgesia.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours postoperatively

  3. Postoperative Complications

    Incidence of postoperative complications including nausea, vomiting, and respiratory complications.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The study investigators do not plan to make individual-level data publicly available. Results will be reported in aggregate form to ensure participant confidentiality.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07533279
Lead sponsor
Sohag University
Collaborators
Cairo University
Responsible party
Salaheldin Ahmed Abdelziz (Anesthesia specialist, Sohag University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2026

Study contacts

Khaled M Hassan mohamed, MD
Contact
dr.khalid.azab@gmail.com
01153564555
Mohamed Mansour, MD
principal investigator · Professor of Anesthesia, ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion