ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07526064Updated Apr 13, 2026

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in Missed Abortion in First Trimester of Pregnancy

A Phase 1 interventional study of Oral misoprostol and Misoprostol (given vaginally) in Missed Abortion, sponsored by Hamna Khaliq. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Hamna Khaliq · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Incomplete abortion has an eminent clinical diagnosis and is characterized by transvaginal bleeding associated with an open uterine cervix upon physical examination when the products of conception have not been wholly discharged. This is the most frequent clinical presentation of this condition. Currently, misoprostol (prostaglandin E2 analog), along with mifepristone, is the reference drug for medicated uterine emptying in cases of spontaneous or induced abortion, both in the first gestational trimester and at more advanced gestational ages.Misoprostol-only is a safe and effective option for females with missed abortion in the first trimester, although less effective than standard regimens that also contain mifepristone.Once the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of misoprostol in incomplete abortion are well established, future studies must be done in finding the ideal route of administration (oral, sublingual, or vaginal), perfect dosage, and intervals of administration when necessary.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of oral versus vaginal misoprostol in cases of missed abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy. Misoprostol is widely used for medical management of early pregnancy loss; however, the optimal route of administration remains uncertain. Comparing these two routes may help identify the most effective and safest method, thereby improving patient outcomes and guiding clinical practice. According to literature, misoprostol administered vaginally has better effectiveness and fewer side effects. However, conflicting evidence has been found in literature that indicates there is no difference between both route for misoprostol administration. In order to determine the best course of action with the fewest adverse effects for women who have missed an abortion, we wish to carry out this experiment. In order to apply the more appropriate route to the local community, adopt a more effective approach, and revise the criteria for doing so. This will enhance our expertise and methods as well as will improve patients' satisfaction will treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Missed Abortion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Oral misoprostol
  • First Trimester
  • Vaginal misoprostol
03

In context

Abortion, Missed

48 studies on the registry are indexed under Abortion, Missed; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 110 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Abortion, Missed.

Browse Abortion, Missed studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Hamna Khaliq as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parity \<5
  • Presenting with missed abortion (defined as spontaneous loss of pregnancy, presence of lower abdomen cramps, ultrasound scan shows no fetal cardiac activity during 8-16 weeks of pregnancy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy with any degree of cervical dilatation
  • Signs or symptoms of infection,
  • Twin gestation sac, molar pregnancy (on ultrasound),
  • Excessive uterine bleeding,
  • Blood pressure ≥160/90 mmHg,
  • Maternal history of asthma or cardiac or cerebral disease
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A

    After obtaining informed consent and demographic information, anemia, previous abortion, use of intrauterine contraceptive device, history of taking hormonal treatment, in-vitro fertilization) will be recorded. Then females will be randomly divided in two groups by using lottery method. In group A, 50 females will be given 400 µg Misoprostol orally, maximum of 3 doses.Then females will be followed-up in labor room until expulsion of conception material Induction to expulsion interval will be noted. After expulsion, females will undergo ultrasonography by a senior sonologist with assistance of researcher. If there will be no retained conception material in uterus, then efficacy will be labeled. Females will be shifted to post-delivery wards and will be followed-up there for 48 hours for assessment of any adverse effect including nausea, vomiting, headache, diarrhea,fever and rash. All this Information will be recorded in proforma.

    Drug: Oral misoprostol

  • Active comparator
    Group B

    After obtaining informed consent and demographic information, anemia, previous abortion, use of intrauterine contraceptive device, history of taking hormonal treatment, in-vitro fertilization) will be recorded. Then females will be randomly divided in two groups by using lottery method. In group B, 50 females will be given 400 µg Misoprostol vaginally at maximum of 3 doses.Then females will be followed-up in labor room until expulsion of conception material Induction to expulsion interval will be noted. After expulsion, females will undergo ultrasonography by a senior sonologist with assistance of researcher. If there will be no retained conception material in uterus, then efficacy will be labeled. Females will be shifted to post-delivery wards and will be followed-up there for 48 hours for assessment of any adverse effect including nausea, vomiting, headache, diarrhea,fever and rash. All this Information will be recorded in proforma.

    Drug: Misoprostol (given vaginally)

Interventions

  • In group A, females will be given 400 µg orally, maximum of 3 doses.Females will be shifted to post-delivery wards and will be followed-up there for 48 hours for assessment of any adverse effect.

  • In group B, females will be given 400 µg vaginally, maximum of 3 doses.Females will be shifted to post-delivery wards and will be followed-up there for 48 hours for assessment of any adverse effect.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Induction to Expulsion Interval

    Induction to expulsion interval is assessed in terms of hours required to expel the conception material.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Efficacy of Oral Versus Vaginal route

    Efficacy assessed on the basis that no retained conception material in uterus detected on ultrasound after 24 hours of induction

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of Oral Misoprostol versus Vaginally administered Misoprostol

    Safety is assessed in terms of absence of any adverse event including nausea and vomiting (\>3 episodes per week), headache, diarrhea (\>3 loose stools), fever (\>100oF), and rash (redness and itching on skin)

    Time frame: 48hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • PNS Hafeez
    Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Jul 2026, 2 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2026
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
StartEst.
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2026
Last update
Apr 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07526064
Lead sponsor
Hamna Khaliq
Responsible party
Hamna Khaliq (Principal Investigator, PNS Hafeez - Naval Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Hamna Khaliq, MBBS
Contact
hamnakhaliq6@gmail.com
+923186333530

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Misoprostol

Start the discussion