ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07525284PREMREAUpdated Apr 13, 2026

Reported Experience Measurement on Reducing Patient Discomfort in Intensive Care

An interventional study of PREMREA program in PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by Almaviva Sante. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Almaviva Sante · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2025, registered Apr 2026).
  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,242
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hospitalisation in intensive care is always traumatic and can lead to a long rehabilitation process, slowed down by symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These psychiatric disorders, or post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), can persist for several years after hospitalisation in intensive care and cause functional disability. They are associated with the use of psychotropic drugs and mental health services, and impair health-related quality of life.

This research is based on the hypothesis that the traumatic nature of intensive care hospitalisation can be reduced by implementing programmes to improve intensive care hospitalisation conditions, promoting changes in the practices of all healthcare professionals involved in intensive care.

IPREA3 study (Kalfon et al, 2017) demonstrated that implementation of a tailor-made, multi-component programme, led by a doctor/non-medical caregiver significantly reduced the overall discomfort score (derived from the IPREA questionnaire) perceived by patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit with sufficient experience in applying this programme, having used it for at least 5 months (Kalfon et al, 2017) .

The originality and interest of this research, in comparison with the IPREA3 study, lie in the following aspects:

  • the use of the most recent version of the IPREA questionnaire,
  • the questionnaire was completed by the patient themselves without the intervention of a caregiver (self-administration)
  • the fact that new care practices, aimed at humanising a stay in intensive care and making the experience of a stay in intensive care less traumatic, were described after the publication of the IPREA3 study a
  • a longer programme learning period of 9 months (compared to 5 months during the IPREA3 study)
  • the launch of the PREMREA programme with a conference led by a patient expert
Read the detailed description

Hospitalisation in intensive care is always traumatic and can lead to a long rehabilitation process, slowed down by symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These psychiatric disorders, or post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), can persist for several years after hospitalisation in intensive care and cause functional disability. They are associated with the use of psychotropic drugs and mental health services, and impair health-related quality of life.

This research is based on the hypothesis that the traumatic nature of intensive care hospitalisation can be reduced by implementing programmes to improve intensive care hospitalisation conditions, promoting changes in the practices of all healthcare professionals involved in intensive care.

IPREA3 study (Kalfon et al, 2017) demonstrated that implementation of a tailor-made, multi-component programme, led by a doctor/non-medical caregiver duo and based on:

  1. a systematic assessment by the caregiver in charge of the patient on the day of discharge from intensive care of any discomfort experienced during the entire stay, based on a specific questionnaire (Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation - IPREA - comprising 16 items of discomfort (Kalfon et al, 2010),
  2. immediate feedback to caregivers with reminders of simple predetermined measures,
  3. monthly comparative feedback to promote a positive spirit of emulation among participating intensive care units, significantly reduced the overall discomfort score (derived from the IPREA questionnaire) perceived by patients hospitalised in an intensive care unit with sufficient experience in applying this programme, having used it for at least 5 months (Kalfon et al, 2017) .

The originality and interest of this research, in comparison with the IPREA3 study, lie in the following aspects:

  • the use of the most recent version of the IPREA questionnaire, which includes 18 discomfort items
  • the questionnaire was completed by the patient themselves without the intervention of a caregiver (self-administration) to avoid potential bias associated with the administration of the questionnaire by a caregiver from the unit in which the patient was hospitalised
  • the fact that new care practices, aimed at humanising a stay in intensive care and making the experience of a stay in intensive care less traumatic, were described after the publication of the IPREA3 study and then applied without assessing the impact on patient perception as measured using the IPREA questionnaire
  • a longer programme learning period of 9 months (compared to 5 months during the IPREA3 study) to allow healthcare teams to better assimilate the changes to care practices decided upon during monthly feedback sessions
  • the launch of the PREMREA programme with a conference led by a patient expert to raise awareness among intensive care teams
02

Conditions studied

  • PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

  • PTSD
  • IPREA questionnaire
03

In context

Combat Disorders

200 studies on the registry are indexed under Combat Disorders; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,242 is above the median of 72 across 167 interventional studies indexed under Combat Disorders.

Browse Combat Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Almaviva Sante is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient, male or female, aged ≥ 18 years
  • Patient discharged alive from intensive care
  • Patient hospitalised in intensive care for at least three calendar days
  • Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security scheme
  • Patient who speaks French and has signed an form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose situation is incompatible with completing the IPREA questionnaire
  • Protected patients: adults under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Patients hospitalised without consent
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,242 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm PREMREA +

    Patients in this arm will benefit from measures taken from PREMREA program

    Other: PREMREA program

  • No intervention
    Arm PREMREA -

    Patients in this arm do not benefit from measures taken from PREMREA program

Interventions

  • OtherPREMREA program

    PREMREA is a tailor-made, multi-component program led by a doctor/non-medical caregiver duo, consisting of the following elements: * Systematic completion of the 18-item IPREA questionnaire by the patient on the day of discharge. * Monthly feedback to all intensive care staff presenting the monthly results of the department and other participating departments, led by the doctor/non-medical caregiver duo. * Implementation of specific measures in the department, decided collectively and coordinated by the doctor/non-medical caregiver duo, and monitoring of these measures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall discomfort score

    Overall discomfort score is obtained from the 18-item IPREA questionnaire. It consists of 18 pre-established items describing the most common sources of discomfort in intensive care : noise, excessive light, discomfort related to unfamiliar bedding, lack of sleep, thirst, hunger, cold, heat, pain, restriction of autonomy due to cables and infusion lines, lack of privacy, anxiety, isolation, limited visits from loved ones, lack of a telephone, insufficient information about current health status, difficulty breathing, depression (Baumstarck et al, 2019). For each of the 18 discomfort items, the patient gives a score between 0 (no discomfort at all) and 10 (maximum discomfort imaginable). The overall discomfort score is calculated as the average of the 18 discomfort scores multiplied by 10, resulting in a score between 0 and 100

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07525284
Lead sponsor
Almaviva Sante
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Start date
Dec 19, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Pierre KALFON, MD
Contact
pierrekalfon@sfr.fr
+ 33 6 38 39 24 18

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion