CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07523516Updated Apr 13, 2026

Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer

An observational study in Breast Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic), sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
97
Sex
All
01

Study summary

compare the accuracy and sensitivity of 18F FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT in detecting distant metastases in breast cancer

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type and the most common cause of death in women worldwide.

Breast cancer patients with large tumours (T3) have a 8.3%-15.1% risk for distant metastasis. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is considered an incurable disease with a 5-year overall survival of only 25%.

Effective management of breast cancer requires accurate diagnosis and determination of the extent of the disease to select the most effective treatment approach. Breast cancer is very heterogenous and is characterized by different pathological features, with distinct responses to treatment and differences in long-term patient survival.

Various imaging modalities have been suggested for diagnosing MBC; however, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and bone scintigraphy are often used in clinical practice. However, CE-CT has low sensitivity for bone metastases and low specificity for liver metastases.

CE-CT and the corresponding response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) are methods that assess changes in structural lesions, making it challenging to differentiate between active tumour tissue and scar lesions [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F] FDG-PET/CT) is a glucose analog transported via glucose transporters into the cells and phosphorylated by hexokinase .FDG follows the same pathway as glucose during the first enzymatic reactions in the cells, but because FDG lacks a hydroxyl group at the C-2 position, it is not metabolized further and is physically trapped in tumor cells at a rate proportional to glucose utilization.

Malignant cells show higher glucose metabolism and increased glycolytic activity compared to non-malignant cells (10). This high glycolytic activity eases the detection of malignant cells using [18F] FDG-PET/CT) imaging. so, [18F] FDG-PET/CT can detect changes in metabolic activity before morphologic changes can be seen.

However, the exact clinical stage at which PET/CT can be performed with well-balanced cost-effectiveness is uncertain till now .

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer (Locally Advanced or Metastatic)

Keywords

  • breast cancer, metastatic, CE-CT
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 97 is below the median of 184 across 2,642 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients with metastatic breast cancer

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with pathologically proven breast cancer

    1. Metastatic breast cancer proved by pathology or radiological modalities.
    2. Interval between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CE-CT from one to three weeks.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with known concomitant malignancy

    1. Patients receive systemic treatment chemotherapy or radiotherapy between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CE-CT.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
97 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Breast cancer Patients

    18 FDG PET CT scan for metastatic breast cancer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting distant metastases.

    Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting distant metastases.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Early staging and clinical management of breast cancer in attempt to improve survival and quality of life

    Early staging and clinical management of breast cancer in attempt to improve survival and quality of life

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Niikura N, Costelloe CM, Madewell JE, Hayashi N, Yu TK, Liu J, Palla SL, Tokuda Y, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1111-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0089. Epub 2011 Jul 17. PubMed 21765193 ↗
  • Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Feb;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3. PubMed 29516387 ↗
  • Vercher-Conejero JL, Pelegri-Martinez L, Lopez-Aznar D, Cozar-Santiago Mdel P. Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2015 Mar 16;5(1):61-83. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics5010061. PubMed 26854143 ↗
  • Zangheri B, Messa C, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Landoni C, Fazio F. PET/CT and breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Jun;31 Suppl 1:S135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1536-7. Epub 2004 May 5. PubMed 15133636 ↗
  • Vogsen M, Harbo F, Jakobsen NM, Nissen HJ, Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE, Gerke O, Jensen JD, Asmussen JT, Jylling AMB, Braad PE, Vach W, Ewertz M, Hildebrandt MG. Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study Comparing 18F-FDG PET/CT with Conventional CT. J Nucl Med. 2023 Mar;64(3):355-361. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263358. Epub 2022 Oct 7. PubMed 36207136 ↗
  • Loibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, Denkert C, Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32381-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1. PubMed 33812473 ↗
  • Hadebe B, Harry L, Ebrahim T, Pillay V, Vorster M. The Role of PET/CT in Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;13(4):597. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040597. PubMed 36832085 ↗
  • Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, Curigliano G, Aapro MS, Andre F, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bhattacharyya GS, Biganzoli L, Boyle F, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, El Saghir NS, Elzayat M, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Gelmon K, Gligorov J, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaufman B, Kaur R, Kiely BE, Kim SB, Lin NU, Mertz SA, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Prat A, Penault-Llorca F, Rugo HS, Sledge GW, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Wiseman T, Xu B, Norton L, Costa A, Winer EP. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1623-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 23. No abstract available. PubMed 32979513 ↗
  • Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. PubMed 21351269 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07523516
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Seham Sharef Eid Ahmed (doctor, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Seham Sharef Eid, Master's degree
Contact
Seham.14224009@med.aun.edu.eg
00201097515105
Hebatallah Ahmed Abdelraof, Professor
principal investigator · nuclear medicine unit Assiut university

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion