CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07516275Updated Apr 7, 2026

Prospective Cohort Study of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma

An observational study in Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma and Hemodynamic Instability, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-07.

Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will enroll patients scheduled for PPGL removal surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Before surgery, researchers will use a 6-variable model to predict the patient's risk of experiencing severe blood pressure swings during the operation. During surgery, a real-time early warning tool will be tested for its ability to accurately predict blood pressure changes 60 seconds in advance. The study will also explore the value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in understanding blood pressure fluctuations and evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) agent for preoperative anesthesia assessment, comparing its accuracy, consistency, and efficiency against that of human anesthesiologists.

Participation involves no changes to the patient's standard surgical or medical care. It includes collecting clinical data, wearing a CGM sensor from the day before to the day after surgery, and having the preoperative assessment performed by both the AI agent and anesthesiologists.

Read the detailed description

Background: Resection of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) carries a high risk of intraoperative hemodynamic instability (HDI) due to catecholamine release. Existing predictive models have limitations, and novel tools require prospective validation. This study aims to address this gap.

Objective: The primary objectives are to: 1) Prospectively validate a previously developed 6-variable model for predicting severe HDI subtypes; 2) Assess the accuracy and timeliness of a real-time intraoperative early warning tool for HDI events; 3) Explore the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and intraoperative HDI; and 4) Evaluate the clinical utility of an AI-based preoperative anesthesia assessment agent against human assessors.

Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Eligible patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective PPGL resection will be enrolled.

Prediction Model Validation: Preoperative data (symptoms, hemoglobin, tumor functional status, epinephrine/norepinephrine elevation multiples, phenoxybenzamine dose) will be used to predict the HDI subtype (mild vs. severe). The predicted subtype will be compared against the actual subtype determined by post-hoc K-means clustering of intraoperative hemodynamic data (24 metrics).

Real-time Warning Tool Validation: The tool will be used intraoperatively to predict vital signs (SBP, DBP, MAP, HR) 60 seconds ahead based on the preceding 200 seconds of data. Its predictions will be compared against actual monitored values, and its sensitivity/specificity for predicting hypertensive, hypotensive, and tachycardic events will be calculated.

CGM Exploration: Patients will wear a CGM sensor from the day before surgery to one day after. Metrics like mean glucose, glycemic variability, and time in hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia will be analyzed for their association with intraoperative HDI outcomes using multivariable regression.

AI Agent Evaluation: Each patient will undergo paired preoperative assessments: one by the AI agent and one by a junior anesthesiologist (≤5 years experience). A senior anesthesiologist (≥10 years experience) will provide the reference standard for risk stratification, tumor functionality, and preparation adequacy. Accuracy, inter-rater agreement (Kappa), and assessment time will be compared between the AI and junior anesthesiologist.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes include the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUROC) for the prediction model, the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) for the warning tool, the occurrence of intraoperative HDI for the CGM analysis, and the accuracy of the AI agent's risk stratification. Sample sizes have been calculated for each sub-study, with a total target enrollment of approximately 202 participants to meet all objectives.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pheochromocytoma
  • Paraganglioma
  • Hemodynamic Instability
  • Intraoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Pheochromocytoma
  • Paraganglioma
  • Hemodynamic Instability
  • Predictive Model
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring
  • Prospective Cohort
03

In context

Pheochromocytoma

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Pheochromocytoma; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 186 across 54 observational studies indexed under Pheochromocytoma.

Browse Pheochromocytoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking Union Medical College Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,115 studies on the registry; 463 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma scheduled for elective surgical resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosed with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma by imaging and laboratory tests and scheduled for elective resection.
  • Planned intraoperative continuous invasive arterial pressure monitoring.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Able to comply with preoperative CGM monitoring, AI agent assessment, and postoperative follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intraoperative hemodynamic data missing ≥20%.
  • Postoperative histopathology excludes PPGL diagnosis.
  • Cardiac paraganglioma or metastatic PPGL.
  • Severe cardiac disease (e.g., severe valvular disease, severe heart failure) that could independently cause intraoperative HDI.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Mental illness, cognitive impairment, or communication barriers that prevent compliance with study procedures.
  • Refusal to undergo CGM monitoring or AI agent assessment.
  • Major illness (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, severe infection) within 3 months prior to surgery.
  • Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency (Child-Pugh class C, eGFR \<30 ml/min/1.73 m²).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • PPGL Resection Cohort

    Patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who are scheduled for elective surgical resection. All participants will undergo the same study procedures: preoperative data collection, CGM monitoring, AI and human preoperative assessment, intraoperative application of the real-time warning tool, and postoperative follow-up. No intervention is applied; this is purely observational.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Predictive Model Discrimination (AUROC)

    Discriminative ability of the preoperative 6-variable model for predicting severe intraoperative hemodynamic instability (HDI) subtype, assessed by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC).

    Time frame: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Heart Rate (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for heart rate, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored heart rate values. Unit of Measure: %

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

  2. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Systolic Blood Pressure (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for blood pressure parameters, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored values for systolic blood pressure (SBP). Unit of Measure: %

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

  3. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Diastolic Blood Pressure (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for blood pressure parameters, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored values for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Unit of Measure: %

    Time frame: Intraoperative period

  4. Predictive Model Calibration

    Calibration of the preoperative 6-variable predictive model, assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p-value), calibration curve, and Brier score. Unit of Measure: p-value (dimensionless), Brier score (dimensionless)

    Time frame: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery

  5. Predictive Model Clinical Utility (DCA)

    Clinical utility of the preoperative model, assessed by Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) to evaluate net clinical benefit at different threshold probabilities. Unit of Measure: Net benefit (dimensionless probability)

    Time frame: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery

  6. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Mean Arterial Pressure (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for blood pressure parameters, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored values for mean arterial pressure (MAP). Unit of Measure: %

    Time frame: Time Frame: Intraoperative period

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07516275
Lead sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 7, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 7, 2026

Study contacts

YE MA, MD
Contact
maye_thu16@163.com
+86 18801015226
LE SHEN, MD, PhD
study chair · Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion