ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07514949SOLUTION-ICDUpdated Apr 7, 2026

The Feasibility and Safety of RK-4 Injection Bypassing Blood-brain Barrier in the Treatment of Acute Large Hemispheric Infarction Using Intracalvariosseous Injection Device

An interventional study of RK-4 ICO injection and Conventional treatment in Stroke, Acute Ischemic Stroke and Blood-Brain Barrier, sponsored by yilong Wang. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-07.

Primary conditionIschemic StrokeRegistry: StrokeReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Stroke — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Ischemic Stroke
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Ischemic Stroke, a narrower term within Stroke.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by yilong Wang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A pilot study confirmed the feasibility and safety of neuroprotectant RK-4 intracalvariosseous(ICO) injection in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (mMCAI), showing a trend in improving 90-day functional scores compared to conventional treatment. The aim of this trial is to investigate the feasibility and safety of neuroprotective agent RK-4 injection using intracalvariosseous injection device in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction (LHI) who has contraindications of reperfusion therapy or have got poor reperfusion therapy outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The mortality rate of large hemispheric infarction (LHI) is up to 40%-60%, while current available treatment is limited. Mainstream therapeutics include endovascular reperfusion therapy and decompressive craniectomy. But endovascular-reperfusion has limits such as short time window and hemorrhagic transformation risk, while decompressive craniectomy can reduce mortality but not infarct volume. Curative effect of intravenous injection of neuroprotective drugs is severely limited because of the blood-brain barrier. Microchannels connecting the skull bone marrow and dura may be effective drug delivery shortcuts bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Cytoprotective drug RK-4 affects dual aspects of ischemic cascade by disrupting both function of the synaptic folding post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95), as well as α2-v#Aminobutyric acid type A receptor (α2-GABAAR) agonist. Phase I and Phase II clinical trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of intravenous infusion of RK-4 in treating cerebral infarction, with the optimal dosage being 40mg. Preclinical testing proved that ICO injection of RK-4 solution 24h post rat permanent middle cerebral artery infarction reduced rat infarction volume and improved neurological function. Previously, our team has conducted the RK-4 intracalvariosseous administration in the earlier SOLUTION clinical trail through the existing neurosurgical devices. Although the safety and efficacy were preliminarily demonstrated, present administration device is not minimally invasive and requires operation in the ICU, which leads to a higher risk of the inner plate penetration. The new intracalvariosseous injection device shows promising prospective in precise control of the drilling speed and depth, and better achievement of accurate, high-efficiency and microinvasive drug delivery.

The study is a single-centered, prospective, randomized, open-label study. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of RK-4 injection using intracalvariosseous injection device in acute LHI patients with contraindications of reperfusion therapy or poor outcomes.

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups at 1:1 ratio.

ICO injection group: RK-4 ICO injection through intracalvariosseous injection device (using an electric bone drill to drill 3 holes (each for 1-time administration) from the outer plate of the skull without penetrating the inner cranial plate), dose was given as 32 ug/kg once a day for 3 consecutive days, as well as standard treatment and management according to the related guidelines. Conventional treatment group: Conventional treatment group will receive standard treatment and management according to related guidelines.

Face to face interviews will be made on baseline, 4±1 days after randomization, 8±1 days after randomization, 14±1 days after randomization or discharge day, and 90±7 days,180±14 days after randomization.

The primary outcomes include feasibility outcomes and safety outcomes. Feasibility Outcomes include the internal plate of skull was drilled thoroughly, drug leakage during injection, the patient refused to continue, failure for other reasons during 3 days'treatment. Safety Outcomes includes Infection events (skin infection, osteomyelitis, or intracranial infection), symptomatic and non- symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, moderate to severe bleeding (defined by the GUSTO), hepatic insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency during the treatment, severe or extremely severe anaemia (hemoglobin \<60g / L), mortality, incidence of other adverse events / serious adverse events reported.

The secondary outcomes include the effectiveness outcomes. The effectiveness outcomes include change of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores from baseline values to 14±1 days or at discharge, the change of the The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores from baseline to 14±1 days or at discharge, the modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 points at 90±7 days and the mRS 0-3 points at 180±14 days.

A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will regularly monitor safety during the study. The trial has been approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee (EC) in Being Tiantan hospital, Capital Medical University.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Blood-Brain Barrier

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • large hemispheric infarction
  • postsynaptic density protein 95 inhibitor
  • BBB-bypassing route
  • brain drug delivery
  • intracalvariosseous injection
  • intracalvariosseous injection device
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke Reclassified

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 6 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

yilong Wang is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Compared within Ischemic Stroke, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Stroke. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18≤Age≤80 years;
  • First stroke or complete self-care before the onset of current stroke (mRS 0-1);
  • Administration of drugs can be completed within 24h of the onset of signs and symptoms of neurological deficits (in patients with wake-up strokes or unwitnessed strokes, the time of onset is defined as the time of last normal presentation);
  • Clinical symptoms, signs and imaging diagnosis of cerebral infarction in the area supplied by the middle cerebral artery, together with the following features:

    1. 16≤ NIHSS ≤32 points, and the sum of the scores of motor arm and motor leg is ≥6;
    2. Imaging suggestive of core infarct area: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values \<620×10-6mm2/s lesion volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences or cerebral blood flow (CBF) \<30% of volume 70-300 ml on computed tomography perfusion imaging (CTP) or an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 0-6, with inconsistent findings, the investigator is required to make a reasoned judgement by taking into account all the information (scanning time, the imaging method that best responds to the size of infarct, etc.) and record it.
  • NIHSS score not improving or progressing after reperfusion therapy and total score still ≤32.
  • signed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complications with other cerebrovascular diseases meet one of the following conditions:

    1. Complicated with acute cerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage;
    2. Complicated with acute posterior circulation cerebral infarction or severe posterior circulation stenosis (>70%);
    3. Or imaging suggests that the area of cerebral infarction is involved bilaterally;
    4. The cause of the TOAST classification was considered as intracranial artery dissection, vasculitis, moyamoya disease and other etiological types.
  • Hemorrhage transformation in the infarction area, hematoma area ≥30% of the infarction area, and has obvious space-occupying effect;
  • Presence of clinical signs of brain herniation formation, e.g., unilateral or bilateral pupil dilation and fixation; cerebral oedema-associated loss of consciousness (NIHSS 1a > 2 points), or other loss of brainstem reflexes in the judgement of the investigator, caused by cerebral oedema or cerebral herniation formation; or other signs of instability of vital signs that are difficult to control;
  • Craniotomy decompression was planned before randomization;
  • hypertension (systolic > 200mmHg or diastolic > 110mmHg) or hypotension (systolic \< 70mmHg or diastolic \< 50mmHg) that is difficult to control with medication;
  • Abnormal blood glucose before randomization (random venous blood glucose \< 2.8mmol/L or > 23mmol/L);
  • Presence of significant abnormal liver function markers or renal function markers prior to randomization; Note: Severe liver function abnormalities were defined as serum (ALT), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 times the (ULN). Significant renal insufficiency is defined as less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR, calculated using the CKD-EPI formula)
  • Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and/or decompensated heart failure (meeting the New York College of Cardiology () Heart function grades III and IV) within the past 3 months;
  • Presence of to intracalvariosseous injection, e.g., skull fracture in the last 3 months, skull infection, subdural/extradural hematoma, subcutaneous hematoma, skin or subcutaneous infection of the scalp, poorly displayed skull bone marrow niches;
  • Bleeding tendencies considered by the investigators to be detrimental to the procedure include, but are not limited to, counts \< 100×109/L, and the presence of clotting disorders such as hemophilia;
  • Presence of severe or very severe anemia ( \<60 g/L) at randomization;
  • Patients with severe respiratory diseases (severe , respiratory failure, etc.) should be corrected by intubation, tracheotomy, or ventilator;
  • The subjects were considered to have developed serious infections, including severe local infections or systemic infections;
  • Diagnosed severe degenerative diseases of the central nervous system such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Parkinson's Disease (PD), and severe dementia of all causes, or psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, depression, etc.);
  • Subjects with a of less than 3 months due to conditions not considered current by the investigators, such as tumors;
  • Known allergy to any component of process therapy drugs and contrast agents;
  • Subjects who are pregnant, breastfeeding or have the possibility of becoming pregnant or plan to become pregnant;
  • Subjects are unable to comply with trial protocols or follow-up requirements;
  • Other circumstances deemed by the investigators to be unsuitable for enrollment (registration of reasons for inability to enroll is required);
  • Have participated in other interventional clinical trials.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
6 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ICO injection group

    RK-4 ICO injection through intracalvariosseous injection device (drilling 3 holes (each for 1-time administration) from the outer cranial plate without penetrating the inner plate), dose was given as 32 ug/kg once a day for 3 consecutive days, as well as standard treatment and management according to the related guidelines.

    Device: RK-4 ICO injection · Other: Conventional treatment

  • Sham comparator
    Conventional treatment group

    standard treatment and management according to related guidelines.

    Other: Conventional treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceRK-4 ICO injection

    Patients included will be given skull outer plate drilling surgery and RK-4 ICO injection under local anesthesia and sedation using the intracalvariosseous injection device. The drilling and injection will be conducted once a day for 3 consecutive days.

  • OtherConventional treatment

    standard treatment and management according to related guidelines

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failed of drilling

    The rate of the internal plate of skull was drilled through

    Time frame: during 3 days of treatment

  2. Number of drug-leakage events

    Number of drug-leakage events

    Time frame: during 3 days of treatment

  3. Patients' tolerance of therapy

    The number of patients who refused to continue the treatment because of the intolerance

    Time frame: during 3 days of treatment

  4. Failed for other reasons

    Number of failed for other reasons

    Time frame: during 3 days of treatment

  5. Rate of participants with infection events

    Rate of participants with infection events (including skin infection, osteomyelitis of skull, or intracranial infection)

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  6. Rate of intracranial hemorrhage

    Rate of symptomatic and non-symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  7. Rate of bleeding

    Rate of bleeding (moderate to severe bleeding, defined by the GUSTO)

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  8. Rate of hepatic insufficiency

    Rate of hepatic insufficiency: serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase (APL)\> 2 times the ULN or the multiple of the abnormal baseline value before medication; Or, serum total bilirubin (TBil) \> 2.5 mg/dL (42.75 μmol/L), accompanied by increased levels of serum AST, ALT or ALP.

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  9. Rate of severe renal insufficiency

    Rate of severe renal insufficiency: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)\<30 ml/min/1.73m2 during the treatment.

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  10. Severe or extremely severe anaemia

    Severe or extremely severe anaemia (hemoglobin \<60g / L)

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  11. Mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

  12. Adverse events / serious adverse events

    Incidence of other adverse events / serious adverse events reported.

    Time frame: within 90±7 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of GCS scores from baseline

    The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score is a validated and reliable scale to evaluate level of consciousness in patients. The scale assesses 3 functions: Eye Opening, Verbal Response, and Motor Response. GCS scores range from 15 (best) to 3 (worst).

    Time frame: baseline#14±1 days after randomization or at discharge

  2. Change of the NIHSS scores from baseline

    Change of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores from baseline to 14±1days or at discharge. The NIHSS is a standardized neurological examination score that is a valid and reliable measure of disability and recovery after acute stroke. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating increasing severity.

    Time frame: 14±1 days after randomization or at discharge

  3. 90 days functional improvement

    The modified Rankin Scale 0-3 points at 90±7 days. Functional improvement is defined as a dichotomized modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 outcome. The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. The scale runs from 0-6 with "0" being perfect health without symptoms to "6" being death. Score 0: No symptoms Score 1: No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. Score 2: Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. Score 3: Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. Score 4: Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. Score 5: Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. Score 6: Dead

    Time frame: 90±7 days after randomization

  4. 180 days functional improvement

    The modified Rankin Scale 0-3 points at 180±14 days. Functional improvement is defined as a dichotomized modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 outcome. The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. The scale runs from 0-6 with "0" being perfect health without symptoms to "6" being death. Score 0: No symptoms Score 1: No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. Score 2: Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. Score 3: Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. Score 4: Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. Score 5: Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. Score 6: Dead

    Time frame: 180±14 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mazzitelli JA, Smyth LCD, Cross KA, Dykstra T, Sun J, Du S, Mamuladze T, Smirnov I, Rustenhoven J, Kipnis J. Cerebrospinal fluid regulates skull bone marrow niches via direct access through dural channels. Nat Neurosci. 2022 May;25(5):555-560. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01029-1. Epub 2022 Mar 17. PubMed 35301477 ↗
  • Pulous FE, Cruz-Hernandez JC, Yang C, Kaya Zeta, Paccalet A, Wojtkiewicz G, Capen D, Brown D, Wu JW, Schloss MJ, Vinegoni C, Richter D, Yamazoe M, Hulsmans M, Momin N, Grune J, Rohde D, McAlpine CS, Panizzi P, Weissleder R, Kim DE, Swirski FK, Lin CP, Moskowitz MA, Nahrendorf M. Cerebrospinal fluid can exit into the skull bone marrow and instruct cranial hematopoiesis in mice with bacterial meningitis. Nat Neurosci. 2022 May;25(5):567-576. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01060-2. Epub 2022 May 2. PubMed 35501382 ↗
  • Brioschi S, Wang WL, Peng V, Wang M, Shchukina I, Greenberg ZJ, Bando JK, Jaeger N, Czepielewski RS, Swain A, Mogilenko DA, Beatty WL, Bayguinov P, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Schuettpelz LG, Fronick CC, Smirnov I, Kipnis J, Shapiro VS, Wu GF, Gilfillan S, Cella M, Artyomov MN, Kleinstein SH, Colonna M. Heterogeneity of meningeal B cells reveals a lymphopoietic niche at the CNS borders. Science. 2021 Jul 23;373(6553):eabf9277. doi: 10.1126/science.abf9277. Epub 2021 Jun 3. PubMed 34083450 ↗
  • Herisson F, Frodermann V, Courties G, Rohde D, Sun Y, Vandoorne K, Wojtkiewicz GR, Masson GS, Vinegoni C, Kim J, Kim DE, Weissleder R, Swirski FK, Moskowitz MA, Nahrendorf M. Direct vascular channels connect skull bone marrow and the brain surface enabling myeloid cell migration. Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1209-1217. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0213-2. Epub 2018 Aug 27. PubMed 30150661 ↗
  • Xie J, Shen Z, Anraku Y, Kataoka K, Chen X. Nanomaterial-based blood-brain-barrier (BBB) crossing strategies. Biomaterials. 2019 Dec;224:119491. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119491. Epub 2019 Sep 14. PubMed 31546096 ↗
  • Charabati M, Rabanel JM, Ramassamy C, Prat A. Overcoming the Brain Barriers: From Immune Cells to Nanoparticles. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Jan;41(1):42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Dec 12. PubMed 31839374 ↗
  • Terstappen GC, Meyer AH, Bell RD, Zhang W. Strategies for delivering therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021 May;20(5):362-383. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00139-y. Epub 2021 Mar 1. PubMed 33649582 ↗
  • Daneman R, Prat A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Jan 5;7(1):a020412. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020412. PubMed 25561720 ↗
  • Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, Nogueira RG, McTaggart RA, Demchuk AM, Poppe AY, Buck BH, Field TS, Dowlatshahi D, van Adel BA, Swartz RH, Shah RA, Sauvageau E, Zerna C, Ospel JM, Joshi M, Almekhlafi MA, Ryckborst KJ, Lowerison MW, Heard K, Garman D, Haussen D, Cutting SM, Coutts SB, Roy D, Rempel JL, Rohr AC, Iancu D, Sahlas DJ, Yu AYX, Devlin TG, Hanel RA, Puetz V, Silver FL, Campbell BCV, Chapot R, Teitelbaum J, Mandzia JL, Kleinig TJ, Turkel-Parrella D, Heck D, Kelly ME, Bharatha A, Bang OY, Jadhav A, Gupta R, Frei DF, Tarpley JW, McDougall CG, Holmin S, Rha JH, Puri AS, Camden MC, Thomalla G, Choe H, Phillips SJ, Schindler JL, Thornton J, Nagel S, Heo JH, Sohn SI, Psychogios MN, Budzik RF, Starkman S, Martin CO, Burns PA, Murphy S, Lopez GA, English J, Tymianski M; ESCAPE-NA1 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):878-887. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30258-0. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PubMed 32087818 ↗
  • Zhou L, Li F, Xu HB, Luo CX, Wu HY, Zhu MM, Lu W, Ji X, Zhou QG, Zhu DY. Treatment of cerebral ischemia by disrupting ischemia-induced interaction of nNOS with PSD-95. Nat Med. 2010 Dec;16(12):1439-43. doi: 10.1038/nm.2245. Epub 2010 Nov 21. PubMed 21102461 ↗
  • Ugalde-Trivino L, Diaz-Guerra M. PSD-95: An Effective Target for Stroke Therapy Using Neuroprotective Peptides. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;22(22):12585. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212585. PubMed 34830481 ↗
  • Kolias AG, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Decompressive craniectomy: past, present and future. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Jul;9(7):405-15. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.106. Epub 2013 Jun 11. PubMed 23752906 ↗
  • Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp HB, Hacke W; DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Mar;6(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70036-4. PubMed 17303527 ↗
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30. PubMed 31662037 ↗
  • Wu S, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Z, Wang W, Anderson CS, Sandercock P, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui L, Pu C, Jia J, Zhang T, Liu X, Zhang S, Xie P, Fan D, Ji X, Wong KL, Wang L; China Stroke Study Collaboration. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):394-405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3. PubMed 30878104 ↗
  • Jadhav AP, Desai SM, Jovin TG. Indications for Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Guidelines and Beyond. Neurology. 2021 Nov 16;97(20 Suppl 2):S126-S136. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012801. PubMed 34785611 ↗
  • Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Padiglioni C, de la Ossa NP, Strbian D, Tsivgoulis G, Turc G. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33817340 ↗
  • Treadwell SD, Thanvi B. Malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Postgrad Med J. 2010 Apr;86(1014):235-42. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.094292. PubMed 20354047 ↗
  • Wijdicks EF, Sheth KN, Carter BS, Greer DM, Kasner SE, Kimberly WT, Schwab S, Smith EE, Tamargo RJ, Wintermark M; American Heart Association Stroke Council. Recommendations for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Apr;45(4):1222-38. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6. Epub 2014 Jan 30. PubMed 24481970 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07514949
Lead sponsor
yilong Wang
Responsible party
yilong Wang (Vice President of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing Tiantan Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 7, 2026
Start date
Apr 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 7, 2026

Study contacts

Yilong Wang, PhD+MD
Contact
yilong528@gmail.com
18842627325 ext. 13261655100
Yilong Wang, PhD#MD
principal investigator · Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion