ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07509541INSTAB-PEUpdated May 4, 2026

Hemodynamic and Respiratory Instability During Percutaneous Pulmonary Thrombectomy

An observational study in Pulmonary Embolism Acute, sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition caused by the obstruction of pulmonary arteries by thrombi. Patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE may require immediate reperfusion therapies, including percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy. However, this procedure can be associated with significant hemodynamic and respiratory instability, potentially leading to shock, cardiac arrest, or the need for advanced support such as mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

The mechanisms, timing, and causes of intraprocedural hemodynamic and respiratory deterioration during pulmonary thrombectomy are not well established. Factors such as catheter manipulation within the pulmonary arteries, increased pulmonary pressures, and the effects of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation may contribute to clinical instability. In addition, biomarkers such as NT-proBNP may reflect right ventricular strain and could help predict the risk of instability during the procedure.

The aim of this prospective observational study is to determine the incidence, causes, and timing of hemodynamic and/or respiratory instability during percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy in patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE. The study will also compare the occurrence of instability between different thrombectomy devices (FlowTriever® and Indigo® systems) and evaluate the prognostic role of baseline NT-proBNP levels. Secondary objectives include the assessment of in-hospital and 30-day mortality and their underlying causes.

This study will include adult patients undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy as part of routine clinical care. The results of this study may help improve risk stratification, guide procedural planning, and optimize the management of patients undergoing pulmonary thrombectomy, ultimately aiming to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Read the detailed description

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide and represents the third leading cause of cardiovascular death. Patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE may develop significant hemodynamic compromise due to acute right ventricular overload and impaired pulmonary circulation. While anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of treatment, reperfusion therapies are recommended in selected patients, including systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapies, and surgical embolectomy.

Percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy has emerged as an increasingly used reperfusion strategy, particularly in patients with contraindications to thrombolysis or in whom rapid hemodynamic improvement is required. Despite its growing use, the intraprocedural course of these patients is not fully understood. During thrombectomy, mechanical manipulation within the pulmonary arteries, transient increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, and the effects of anesthesia and positive pressure ventilation may contribute to hemodynamic and respiratory instability. These complications may manifest as hypotension, shock, hypoxemia, need for vasopressor support, endotracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or the requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the incidence, timing, and underlying mechanisms of intraprocedural hemodynamic and respiratory deterioration during percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy. In addition, the potential influence of procedural factors, such as the type of thrombectomy device used, has not been fully elucidated. The FlowTriever® (Inari Medical) and Indigo® (Penumbra) systems are among the most commonly used devices, yet comparative data regarding their safety profiles in terms of intraprocedural instability are scarce.

Furthermore, biomarkers reflecting right ventricular strain, such as N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), may provide prognostic information in acute PE. However, their role in predicting intraprocedural instability during thrombectomy remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

This prospective observational study aims to comprehensively evaluate the incidence, causes, and timing of hemodynamic and/or respiratory instability during percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy in patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk PE. The primary outcome is a composite of intraprocedural events including significant hypotension, escalation of vasopressor support, need for mechanical ventilation or intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and/or initiation of ECMO. The temporal relationship between instability and different procedural phases will also be analyzed.

In addition, the study will compare the incidence of intraprocedural instability between patients treated with different thrombectomy devices (FlowTriever® versus Indigo®), adjusting for baseline risk stratification. Secondary objectives include evaluating the prognostic value of baseline NT-proBNP levels for predicting intraprocedural instability and assessing in-hospital and 30-day mortality and their underlying causes.

By providing a detailed characterization of intraprocedural instability and its determinants, this study aims to improve risk stratification, optimize procedural planning, and guide clinical decision-making in patients undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy. Ultimately, these findings may contribute to improving patient safety and clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Embolism Acute

Keywords

  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Percutaneous Pulmonary Thrombectomy
  • Catheter-Directed Thrombectomy
  • Hemodynamic Instability
  • Respiratory Instability
  • Shock
  • NT-proBNP
03

In context

Pulmonary Embolism

832 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 171 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 361 across 366 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.

Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 276 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy in routine clinical practice.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients (aged ≥18 years) with high-risk or intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism
  • Patients undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy as part of routine clinical care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Low-risk pulmonary embolism
  • Patients not undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy
  • Patients presenting with shock upon arrival to the interventional suite
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • FlowTriever Group

    Patients with pulmonary embolism undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy using the FlowTriever system as part of routine clinical care. Device selection is based on physician discretion.

    Procedure: Percutaneous Pulmonary Thrombectomy (FlowTriever)

  • Indigo Group

    Patients with pulmonary embolism undergoing percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy using the Indigo system as part of routine clinical care. Device selection is based on physician discretion.

    Procedure: Percutaneous Pulmonary Thrombectomy (Indigo)

Interventions

  • ProcedurePercutaneous Pulmonary Thrombectomy (FlowTriever)

    Percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy performed using the FlowTriever system as part of routine clinical care. Device selection is based on physician discretion and not assigned by the study protocol.

  • ProcedurePercutaneous Pulmonary Thrombectomy (Indigo)

    Percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy performed using the Indigo system as part of routine clinical care. Device selection is based on physician discretion and not assigned by the study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraprocedural Hemodynamic and/or Respiratory Instability

    Composite outcome defined as the occurrence of any of the following events during percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy: sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg for ≥15 minutes), initiation or escalation of vasopressor support, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), oxygen saturation \<90% sustained, escalation of ventilatory support, or need for endotracheal intubation. Events will also be analyzed according to procedural timing.

    Time frame: During the percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prognostic Value of Baseline NT-proBNP for Intraprocedural Instability

    Association between baseline NT-proBNP levels measured prior to the procedure and the occurrence of intraprocedural hemodynamic and/or respiratory instability.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-procedure) and during the procedure

  2. In-hospital and 30-day Mortality

    All-cause mortality during hospitalization and within 30 days after the procedure, including analysis of underlying causes.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional data protection policies and patient confidentiality considerations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07509541
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2026
Start date
Apr 10, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 10, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
May 10, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 4, 2026

Study contacts

Susana González Suárez, MD; PhD
Contact
susana.gonzalez@vallhebron.cat
+34 934894092

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion