ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07504146ORIENTINGUpdated Mar 31, 2026

The Orienting Study

An observational study in CPPD - Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease and Gout, sponsored by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-31.

Sponsored by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
450
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study at IRCCS Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio Hospital involves patients with gout, CPPD, and osteoarthritis as a control group. Patients will receive routine care with regular clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessments every six months, alongside urgent visits as needed. The study aims to understand crystal deposits in joints and blood vessels and monitor their progression over time, assessing how these deposits respond to standard treatments and if they are associated with cardiovascular complications. Data will be collected from medical records over a follow-up period of up to 10 years, offering long-term insights into disease impact and treatment effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

This is a monocentric observational longitudinal study in which patients diagnosed with gout or CPPD and disease-controls with OA will be consecutively recruited from the outpatient clinics of the Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Hip Departments of the IRCCS Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio Hospital.

The investigators will enroll consecutive patients with CPPD and gout and disease-controls with OA fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, from the outpatient clinics of the Rheumatology Department and Orthopaedic Hip Department of the IRCCS Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, who will be seen for routine or urgent gout/CPPD/OA care following local scheduling processes, without applying any further selection criteria. All patients, in line with clinical routine practice, will undergo a standard clinical, laboratory and imaging assessment, both at baseline and during scheduled follow-up visits (every 6 months) and urgent follow-up visits, tailored to each patient's needs. The study comprises two phases. The first, aims to evaluate the extent of crystal deposition in joints and in blood vessels in patients with CPPD and gout. The second, focuses on monitoring the extension of crystals deposits, their associations with conventional therapies, and evaluating the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with CPPD and gout in comparison to disease-controls with OA. The data for the study will be retrieved from the medical records of the patients and recorded into an appositely created electronic case report form (CRF). The enrollment period will last 3 years (starting from the time of approval of the study), and the follow up period will last 10 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • CPPD - Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease
  • Gout

Keywords

  • CPPD
  • Gout
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Ultrasound
03

In context

Gout

345 studies on the registry are indexed under Gout; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 450 is above the median of 232 across 52 observational studies indexed under Gout.

Browse Gout studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients affected by gout, CPPD or osteoarthritis.

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria for CPPD patients are:

  • Patients diagnosed with CPPD disease according to the ACR/EULAR 2023 classification criteria.
  • Patients with evidence of asymptomatic CPPD on US or X-rays (not meeting the classification criteria) according to validated imaging definitions.
  • Aged older than 18 years.
  • Able to provide , according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.

The inclusion criteria for gout patients are:

  • Patients diagnosed with gout according to the ACR/EULAR 2015 classification criteria.
  • Aged older than 18 years.
  • Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.

The inclusion criteria for disease controls are:

  • A diagnosis of OA according to ACR classification criteria
  • No evidence of uric acid or calcium pyrophosphate deposits on US
  • Uric acid \< 6 mg/dL
  • Aged older than 18 years.
  • Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee

The exclusion criteria for gout/CPPD patients are:

  • Known history of other inflammatory arthropathies
  • Unable to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.

The exclusion criteria for disease controls are:

  • Known history of other inflammatory arthropathies
  • Unable to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
450 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Gout

    Patients affected by gout according to ACR/EULAR classification criteria

  • CPPD

    Patients affected by gout according to ACR/EULAR classification criteria

  • Disease control

    Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis according to ACR classification criteria

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Extent of CPP crystal deposition assessed by ultrasound over time

    Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD) will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for CPPD at patient level and at joint level. Each anatomical site will be graded on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3. According to the clinical scenario and the clinician decision, patients will undergo an US examination of the affected joints. Case by case the following joints will be evaluated: shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, Achilles tendon, foot. The total score will be calculated as the sum of scores across all evaluated sites and normalized by the number of sites assessed per patient. The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes in crystal deposition over time.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  2. Extent of MSU crystal deposition assessed by ultrasound over time

    Assessment of the extent of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD) will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for Gout Lesions (double contour sign, tophi, aggregates). Each lesion will be graded on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3. A total score will be calculated by summing scores across all evaluated joints. According to the clinical scenario and the clinician decision, patients will undergo an US examination of the affected joints. Case by case the following joints will be evaluated: shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, Achilles tendon, foot. The total score will be calculated as the sum of scores across all evaluated sites and normalized by the number of sites assessed per patient. The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes in crystal deposition over time.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  3. Progression of bone erosions assessed by ultrasound

    Bone erosions will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for Bone Erosions. Each site will be graded from 0 to 3 and summed across all evaluated joints to obtain a total erosion score. The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes over time.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  4. Progression of osteophites assessed by ultrasound

    Osteophytes will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for Osteophytes. Each site will be graded from 0 to 3 and summed across all evaluated joints to obtain a total osteophyte score. The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes over time.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. ESR

    Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR mm/h) between patients with CPPD and gout and disease-controls with OA

    Time frame: From baseline every 6 months up to 10 years

  2. CRP

    Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP mg/L) between CPPD and Gout patients and controls with OA

    Time frame: From baseline every 6 months up to ten years

  3. Synovitis Score Assessed by Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS)

    Synovitis will be evaluated thanks to Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS). Ultrasound evaluation will be performed on clinically relevant joints and anatomical structures as determined by the treating physician.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  4. Tenosynovitis Score Assessed by OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System

    Tenosynovitis will be assessed using the OMERACT ultrasound scoring system on a semi-quantitative scale. Ultrasound evaluation will be performed on clinically relevant joints and anatomical structures as determined by the treating physician.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  5. Joint Effusion Score Assessed by Ultrasound

    Joint effusion will be assessed using ultrasound on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3. The joints to be evaluated will be selected according to the clinician's judgement

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  6. Number of Tender Joints Assessed Using 68-Joint Count

    The number of tender joints will be assessed using the 68-joint count method.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  7. Number of Swollen Joints Assessed Using 66-Joint Count

    The number of swollen joints will be assessed using the 66-joint count method.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  8. Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Disease activity will be assessed by the physician using a visual analog scale (0-100)

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  9. Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Scale (0-100)

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  10. Patient-Reported Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Scale (0-100)

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  11. Patient-Reported Global Health Status

    Scale (0-100)

    Time frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years

  12. Functional Disability Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)

    Score (0-3) for every item of the questionnaire, then the sum is calculated

    Time frame: From baseline every six months up to ten years

  13. Cardiovascular Risk Assessed by SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP

    Cardiovascular risk will be estimated using SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP algorithms, depending on patient's age. Both scores express a percentage (%) of the 10-year risk.

    Time frame: At baseline and if clinically indicated during follow-up up to ten years

  14. Incidence of Cardiovascular Events

    Occurrence of cardiovascular events recorded during follow-up (Number of events / % of patients)

    Time frame: During the 10 years follow up

  15. Distribution of Clinical Phenotypes of CPPD and Gout

    Phenotypes of calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease and gout will be classified according to established classification criteria (ACR/EULAR recommendations and G-CAN consensus respectively).

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Serum suPAR Levels Assessed by Enzyme Immunoassay

    Serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels will be measured using an ELISA-based assay on blood and/or synovial fluid, whenever the patients undergo arthrocentesis for other reasons

    Time frame: Once during the 10 years follow up

  2. Intima media thickness at ultrasound of carothid arteries

    Measurment of intima-media thickness (CMIT) at ultrasound of carothid arteries performed as part of routine care will be collected to assess increased atherosclerotic risk. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) often highlights CMIT\> 0.9 as a critical threshold to determine an increased risk

    Time frame: As clinically indicated during follow-up up to ten years from baseline

  3. Assessment of joint damage using X-ray, CT or MRI

    On radiographs and CT, osteoarthritis severity will be evaluated based on osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and subchondral bone changes, using a semi-quantitative grading scale (e.g., Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0-4 for radiographs). On MRI, joint damage will be assessed including cartilage integrity and other structural abnormalities using appropriate semi-quantitative scoring systems (WORMS, MOAKS)

    Time frame: As clinically indicated during follow-up from baseline up to ten years

  4. Histological and Molecular Characteristics of Joint Tissues in Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty

    Biological samples (bone, cartilage, synovial membrane, ligaments/tendons, synovial fluid) collected during clinically indicated arthroplasty procedures will be analyzed using histology, immunohistochemistry, and Raman spectroscopy to assess tissue morphology, inflammatory features, and crystal deposition.

    Time frame: At time of surgery (as applicable)

  5. Coronary stenosis at Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)

    The presence of coronary stenosis at Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) will be recorded. An obstructive stenosis occupies more than 50% of the lumen.

    Time frame: As clinically indicated during follow up up to ten years

  6. Assessment of bone mineral density at DEXA

    Bone mineral density (BMD) will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and proximal femur. Results will be expressed in g/cm², T-scores, and Z-scores. Bone status will be classified as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis according to World Health Organization criteria.

    Time frame: As clinically indicated from baseline up to ten years follow up

  7. Evaluation of CPP crystal and MSU crystal deposition at X-ray, TC or MRI

    CPP and MSU crystal deposition in articular or periarticular structures at other imaging modalities (X-rays, CT scans, MRI) will be qualitatively assessed and documented as presence/absence.

    Time frame: As clinically indicated from baseline up to ten years follow up

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Moller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Bong DA, Martinoli C, Filippucci E, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Damjanov N, Hammer HB, Sudol-Szopinska I, Grassi W, Balint P, Bruyn GAW, D'Agostino MA, Hollander D, Siddle HJ, Supp G, Schmidt WA, Iagnocco A, Koski J, Kane D, Fodor D, Bruns A, Mandl P, Kaeley GS, Micu M, Ho C, Vlad V, Chavez-Lopez M, Filippou G, Ceron CE, Nestorova R, Quintero M, Wakefield R, Carmona L, Naredo E. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):1974-1979. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585. Epub 2017 Aug 16. PubMed 28814430 ↗
  • Hammer HB, Iagnocco A, Mathiessen A, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F, Kortekaas MC, Moller I, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Aegerter P, D'Agostino MA. Global ultrasound assessment of structural lesions in osteoarthritis: a reliability study by the OMERACT ultrasonography group on scoring cartilage and osteophytes in finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Feb;75(2):402-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206289. Epub 2014 Dec 17. PubMed 25520476 ↗
  • Naredo E, D'Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, Moller I, Balint PV, Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Karim Z, Terslev L, Bong DA, Garrido J, Martinez-Hernandez D, Bruyn GA; OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force*. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1328-34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092. Epub 2012 Sep 14. PubMed 22984169 ↗
  • Horta-Baas G. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Key Consideration for Evaluating Biosimilar Uptake? Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Mar 30;13:79-95. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S256715. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35388274 ↗
  • Duarte-Garcia A, Leung YY, Coates LC, Beaton D, Christensen R, Craig ET, de Wit M, Eder L, Fallon L, FitzGerald O, Gladman DD, Goel N, Holland R, Lindsay C, Maxwell L, Mease P, Orbai AM, Shea B, Strand V, Veale DJ, Tillett W, Ogdie A. Endorsement of the 66/68 Joint Count for the Measurement of Musculoskeletal Disease Activity: OMERACT 2018 Psoriatic Arthritis Workshop Report. J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):996-1005. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181089. Epub 2019 Feb 15. PubMed 30770518 ↗
  • Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Gray R, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Nov;33(11):1601-10. doi: 10.1002/art.1780331101. PubMed 2242058 ↗
  • Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 May;34(5):505-14. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340502. PubMed 2025304 ↗
  • Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816. PubMed 3741515 ↗
  • Sirotti S, Becce F, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Naredo E, Zufferey P, Pineda C, Gutierrez M, Adinolfi A, Serban T, MacCarter D, Mouterde G, Zanetti A, Scanu A, Moller I, Novo-Rivas U, Largo R, Sarzi-Puttini P, Abhishek A, Choi HK, Dalbeth N, Pascart T, Tedeschi SK, D'Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, Keen HI, Scire CA, Filippou G. Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiography for the Diagnosis of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition: Performance of the Novel Definitions Developed by an International Multidisciplinary Working Group. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;75(4):630-638. doi: 10.1002/art.42368. Epub 2023 Jan 19. PubMed 36122187 ↗
  • Abhishek A, Tedeschi SK, Pascart T, Latourte A, Dalbeth N, Neogi T, Fuller A, Rosenthal A, Becce F, Bardin T, Ea HK, Filippou G, Fitzgerald J, Iagnocco A, Liote F, McCarthy GM, Ramonda R, Richette P, Sivera F, Andres M, Cipolletta E, Doherty M, Pascual E, Perez-Ruiz F, So A, Jansen TL, Kohler MJ, Stamp LK, Yinh J, Adinolfi A, Arad U, Aung T, Benillouche E, Bortoluzzi A, Dau J, Maningding E, Fang MA, Figus FA, Filippucci E, Haslett J, Janssen M, Kaldas M, Kimoto M, Leamy K, Navarro GM, Sarzi-Puttini P, Scire C, Silvagni E, Sirotti S, Stack JR, Truong L, Xie C, Yokose C, Hendry AM, Terkeltaub R, Taylor WJ, Choi HK. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Oct;82(10):1248-1257. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224575. Epub 2023 Jul 26. PubMed 37495237 ↗
  • SCORE2-OP working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2455-2467. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab312. PubMed 34120185 ↗
  • SCORE2 working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2439-2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309. PubMed 34120177 ↗
  • Wang Y, Deng X, Zhang X, Geng Y, Ji L, Song Z, Zhang Z. Presence of tophi and carotid plaque were risk factors of MACE in subclinical artherosclerosis patients with gout: a longitudinal cohort study. Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1151782. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151782. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37143665 ↗
  • Dalbeth N, Gosling AL, Gaffo A, Abhishek A. Gout. Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1843-1855. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00569-9. Epub 2021 Mar 30. PubMed 33798500 ↗
  • Bashir M, Sherman KA, Solomon DH, Rosenthal A, Tedeschi SK. Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease: A Nationwide Study of Veterans. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;75(2):277-282. doi: 10.1002/acr.24783. Epub 2022 Oct 11. PubMed 34523251 ↗
  • Tedeschi SK, Huang W, Yoshida K, Solomon DH. Risk of cardiovascular events in patients having had acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Aug 11;81(9):1323-1329. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222387. PubMed 35613842 ↗
  • Salaffi F, De Angelis R, Grassi W; MArche Pain Prevalence; INvestigation Group (MAPPING) study. Prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in an Italian population sample: results of a regional community-based study. I. The MAPPING study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Nov-Dec;23(6):819-28. PubMed 16396700 ↗
  • Christiansen SN, Filippou G, Scire CA, Balint PV, Bruyn GA, Dalbeth N, Dejaco C, Sedie AD, Filippucci E, Hammer HB, Iagnocco A, Keen HI, Kissin EY, Koski J, Mandl P, Martin J, Miguel E, Moller I, Naredo E, Pineda C, Schmidt WA, Stewart S, Antonietta D'Agostino M, Terslev L; on the behalf of the OMERACT Ultrasound working group. Consensus-based semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring system for gout lesions: Results of an OMERACT Delphi process and web-reliability exercise. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Jun;51(3):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.11.011. Epub 2021 Jan 10. PubMed 33468347 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07504146
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2026
Start date
Oct 30, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2039 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 31, 2026

Study contacts

Georgios Filippou, MD
Contact
georgios.filippou@grupposandonato.it
0039 0283502707
Silvia Sirotti, MD
Contact
silvia.sirotti@grupposandonato.it
0039 0283502708
Georgios Filippou, MD
principal investigator · Università degli Studi di Milano / IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion