ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07500116NORAHOMEUpdated Mar 30, 2026

NORA-HOME: An Ambulatory Multimodal Monitoring Model In Patients With Minor Stroke And Transient Ischemic Attacks

An interventional study of Home hospitalization in Stroke (CVA) or TIA and Stroke Recurrence, sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Mar 2026).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this project, we aim to validate a Home Hospitalization plan for patients with TIA or minor stroke. Our hypothesis is that our Multimodal Home Hospitalization program (NORAHOME) for patients with TIA and minor stroke is safe, reduces the complications associated with conventional hospitalization, and is more efficient than Standard Clinical Practice. To conduct the study, we require the voluntary participation of patients with TIA and minor strokes.

Read the detailed description

Background: The risk of stroke recurrence is higher in patients who have previously experienced a minor or self-limited event. It is necessary to develop strategies that allow rapid evaluation of these patients and the early initiation of preventive treatment. However, early etiological study of these patients usually requires admission to an Acute Stroke Unit, which entails the cost of a potentially avoidable hospital stay, the inherent risks of hospitalization in fragile patients, and a suboptimal experience for both patients and their families. As an alternative to admission, these patients are discharged from the emergency department to be evaluated early on an outpatient basis in "TIA clinics," with suboptimal clinical and hemodynamic monitoring that does not effectively reduce the risk of early recurrence.

Hypothesis: Our hypothesis is that our Multimodal Home Hospitalization program (NORAHOME) for patients with TIA and minor stroke is safe, reduces the complications inherent to conventional hospitalization, and is more efficient than Standard Clinical Practice.

Objectives:

Primary: To validate that our Home Hospitalization program for patients with TIA or minor stroke (NORAHOME) is an efficient strategy compared to Standard Clinical Practice while maintaining the same level of patient safety.

Primary efficacy objective: Reduce the risk of early recurrence and hospital readmission compared to standard clinical practice.

Primary safety objective: No increase in the number of complications in patients with TIA/minor stroke (falls, recurrences, infections) compared to standard clinical practice.

Secondary:

Reduce direct hospital costs.

Improve patient-reported health outcomes (PROMS) and their experience with the healthcare system (PREMS) compared to standard clinical practice.

Reduce complications inherent to hospital admission (delirium, nosocomial infections, falls).

Improve knowledge about stroke and key secondary prevention recommendations after the acute stroke phase.

Improve control of vascular risk factors and treatment adherence after the acute stroke phase.

Improve assessment of basic (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) compared to standard clinical practice.

Evaluate point-of-care etiological diagnostic studies, including focused echocardiography and multimodal remote cardiac monitoring.

Methodology: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized study of consecutive patients with TIA and minor stroke admitted to the Emergency Department. After signing informed consent, patients will be consecutively randomized to the treatment group (NORAHOME) or the control group (Standard Clinical Practice). After completing a 3-month follow-up period, a comparative statistical analysis between the treatment and control groups will be conducted

Relevance: All guidelines recommend early management of TIA and minor stroke, but there is no consensus on the best care model. It is therefore necessary to develop fast-track pathways to dedicated facilities for evaluation, diagnosis, risk assessment of recurrence, and management of patients with TIA and minor stroke. If the study results confirm the hypothesis, in addition to reducing healthcare costs and relieving pressure on Stroke Units-given the increasing number of patients affected by this condition-it would demonstrate an improvement in the health and quality of life of these patients. The comprehensive care plan and technological development could also allow the inclusion of patients with more severe impairment, through the administration of telerehabilitation treatments (physiotherapy, speech therapy, and occupational therapy), ensuring proper follow-up and facilitating the patient's return to daily life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke (CVA) or TIA
  • Stroke Recurrence

Keywords

  • Stroke, TIA, Hospitalization at Home, Stroke Care, PROMs, PREMs
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 276 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms of (complete recovery of neurological deficits within \<24 hours) or minor stroke (NIHSS ≤ 5)

  • Age >18 years.
  • Availability of a smartphone for the patient or caregiver.
  • Family support and/or formal caregiver.
  • Clinical stability during the last 12 hours in the Emergency Department.
  • Signed by the patient and/or family member or legal representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe stenosis or symptomatic arterial occlusion requiring admission for potential reperfusion and/or arterial revascularization treatments.
  • Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric conditions that may interfere with or complicate follow-up and evaluations.
  • Clinical (terminal condition) or social (language barrier) impossibility to complete follow-up assessments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Randomized to be hospitalized at home

    Other: Home hospitalization

  • No intervention
    Control

    Randomized to conventional hospitalization

Interventions

  • OtherHome hospitalization

    patients randomized to the treatment group (NORAHOME) to validate that our Home Hospitalization program for patients with TIA or minor stroke

    Also known as: Norahome, Treatment group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary efficacy objective

    Change in the rate of early recurrence and hospital readmission compared to standard clinical practice.

    Time frame: 3months

  2. Primary efficacy objective

    Change in the rate of early recurrence and hospital readmission compared to standard clinical practice.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Primary safety objective

    Change in the number of complications (falls, recurrences, infections) in patients with TIA/minor stroke compared to standard clinical practice.

    Time frame: 3months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness

    Change in direct hospital costs compared to standard clinical practice.

    Time frame: 15days

  2. Security

    Change in the incidence of complications associated with hospital admission (delirium, nosocomial infections, falls).

    Time frame: 15 days

  3. Patient reported outcomes

    Change in patient-reported health outcomes (PROMs) and patient experience measures (PREMs) compared to standard clinical practice

    Time frame: 3months

  4. Patient information

    Change in patient knowledge about stroke and key secondary prevention recommendations after the acute stroke phase.

    Time frame: 3months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The variables collected will come from the structured electronic medical record and from the server where NORA information is stored. Data from the structured electronic medical record and NORA are hosted on the hospital's servers. No data will be shared outside the hospital. Based on this information, a database will be created with coded datasets from the different data sources, using a common encrypted code across the datasets to replace any information that could identify individuals. These datasets will be hosted on a specific server at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. The link between the code and the patient's identity will be handled with the highest level of protection on internal servers at Vall d'Hebron Hospital, accessible only to the Principal Investigator and co-investigators through a secure username and password.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 29 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 29 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 11, 2026
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
StartActual
Jan 29, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 29, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 29, 2027
Last update
Mar 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07500116
Collaborators
Vall Hebron Insitut Recerca, Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Start date
Jan 29, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 29, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 29, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Study contacts

Marian Muchada Lopez, MD, PHD
Contact
mangeles.muchada@vallhebron.cat
+34 934893000 ext. 4448
Marta Rubiera del Fueyo, MD, PhD
Contact
martaaurora.rubiera@vallhebron.cat
+34934893000 ext. 4997

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion