ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07499752SOFTUpdated Apr 13, 2026

Study on Fewer Tears (SOFT) - The Effect of Local Anesthesia on the Incidence of Perineal Tears in the First Vaginal Birth

An observational study in Perineal Laceration, Tear, or Rupture During Delivery, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,350
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The SOFT study investigates whether local anaesthesia during the second stage of labor decreases the incidence of perineal tears, including sphincter injuries, in women with their first vaginal birth (non-instrumental).

Read the detailed description

Introduction Perineal tears are the most common complications of vaginal birth. Severe tears can cause long-term physical and psychological morbidity. Preliminary observations suggest that pudendal block and perineal infiltration with local anaesthesia may relax the pelvic floor muscles, reduce pain, and facilitate a more controlled pushing phase. The SOFT study investigates whether local anaesthesia during the second stage of labor decreases the incidence of perineal tears, including sphincter injuries, in women with their first vaginal birth (non-instrumental).

Materials and Methods Data collection for a prospective observational study is ongoing at Danderyd University Hospital. The study documents perineal protection techniques and the incidence of perineal tears in women with their first vaginal birth (non-instrumental). Findings from this preparatory study will guide the design of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate whether pudendal block and perineal infiltration with mepivacaine or placebo have a protective effect on perineal trauma.

The aim is to include 1,350 participants in this observational study. Midwives complete a case report form indicating the use of manual perineal protection, fetal presentation and position, the duration of the second stage, the detailed degree of perineal tear, pain management during the pushing phase, and the need for local anaesthesia during suturing. The full analysis will evaluate associations among perineal protection techniques, local anaesthesia, and the incidence and severity of perineal tears.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perineal Laceration, Tear, or Rupture During Delivery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Perineal injury
  • childbirth
  • vaginal birth
  • local anesthesia
  • pudendal nerve block
  • perineal protection techniques
  • midwifery
03

In context

Lacerations

174 studies on the registry are indexed under Lacerations; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,350 is above the median of 100 across 37 observational studies indexed under Lacerations.

Browse Lacerations studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women 18-64 years undergoing their first vaginal birth which is non-instrumental with one or more live fetuses, all presentations accepted, at gestational week 34+0 or more.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant individuals giving birth.
  • Live fetus/fetuses.
  • Gestational week 34 or more at birth.
  • First vaginal birth, i.e., individuals with prior cesarean section can be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intrauterine fetal death or stillbirth.
  • Labor resulting in cesarean section or instrumental delivery.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,350 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • First vaginal birth

    Women having their first vaginal birth, which is non-instrumental.

    Other: Perineal protection techniques

Interventions

  • OtherPerineal protection techniques

    Perineal protection techniques used by the midwife during a non-instrumental vaginal birth including wet-warm compresses, verbal guidance, oil/gel, perineal massage, two midwives support, pressure relieving position, manual control of the speed of the head's birth, two-step technique, C-grip or Finnish grip for manual perineal protection, supporting the perineum during the delivery of the shoulders, breathing technique during pushing, water birth, acupuncture.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Second-degree perineal injury or worse

    Perineal injury after childbirth diagnosed clinically resulting in the diagnostic codes O701, O702, or O703 (i.e. second, third or fourth degree injury).

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. OASI

    Perineal injury affecting the external or internal anal sphincter muscles (third- or fourth-degree tear, O702 or O703).

    Time frame: Within 24 hours from birth

  2. Episiotomy

    Any incision or cut in the perineum to enlarge the vaginal opening during birth.

    Time frame: Immediately at birth.

Other outcomes

  1. Perineal or vaginal injury of any degree

    All types of tears and injuries resulting from and diagnosed at childbirth.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours from birth

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — IPD can be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request, provided ethical approval and all applicable requirements have been met.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07499752
Collaborators
Danderyd Hospital
Responsible party
Sophia Brismar Wendel (Associate Professor, MD, PhD, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Start date
Oct 20, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 20, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Sophia Brismar Wendel, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion