ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07498062FITSUpdated Mar 27, 2026

Multimodal Chewing Gum Flavour Training to Aid Flavour Perception Recovery - a Pilot Study.

An interventional study of Flavour impairment training using chewing gum group (FIT) and Olfactory training group (OT) in Anosmia, Parosmia and Phantosmia, sponsored by University of Nottingham. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by University of Nottingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Mar 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Olfactory training is developed for people who have partly or completely lost their sense of smell (olfactory dysfunction). Participants expose themselves to odours twice daily for usually 12 weeks or longer. It has been proven to effectively help people improve their sense of smell. However, when abnormal flavour perception is reported it may involve not only a dysfunctional sense of smell, but also taste and trigeminal perception (e.g. burning from chilly, cooling from mint, etc.). The stimulation of multiple sensations can theoretically enhance overall flavour perception. Therefore, we propose a pilot study to test the feasibility testing multi-sensation flavour impairment training approach using chewing gum that target sensations of smell, taste and trigeminal. This will be in comparison with an existing olfactory training approach.

Individuals (aged 18 to 65) with changed flavour perception (self-perceived, within 3 months to 2 years) will be invited to take part in this study. Participants will be randomly and evenly allocated to 3 groups which are: flavour impairment training using chewing gum (FIT), olfactory training (OT) using smelling strips, and a waiting list control group (CTR) (delaying FIT training for 12 weeks). In the first two groups, a 12-week training will be conducted. The training will be undertaken twice a day (in the morning and evening). All participants will use four flavours in a pre-determined and randomised order. One flavour of chewing gum (FIT group) or smelling strips (OT group) will be used each time. Each training session is expected to last around 3 minutes. In addition to the training, all participants will be asked to pay two visits to the lab, once before and once after completing the 12-week training, or the 12-week wait, to evaluate their flavour (smell, taste and trigeminal) perception capability. Participants will also be asked to conduct flavour perception tests at home before and after training following instructions to evaluate if their flavour perception capability has improved due to the training. The OT group and the CTR group will be offered the FIT treatment after they have undertaken the 12 weeks of their study group allocation.

Read the detailed description

Eligibility will be checked via an online questionnaire, where information of flavour perception impairment (self-report), chewing gum consumption habit, potential allergy to chewing gum/smelling bottle ingredients, and difficulty in chewing gums will be checked according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria .

Eligible participants will then be contacted via email for session time confirmation and taking consent. Upon their first visit to the lab, written consent will be taken, and training kit will be given to them.

Participants will be asked to pay two visits to the lab - to evaluate their smell perception using Sniffin' Sticks following a standard protocol (Rumeau et al., 2016) and taste perception using filter-paper disc (Nishijima et al., 2013). Upon their first lab visit, they will taste the four flavours (1 tablet per flavour) of the chewing gum that will be used in the following training. They will be given a questionnaire to indicate their perception and liking of all flavours. If there is any flavour, they find particularly disturbing that they do not wish to use to conduct the training, they have the opportunity to withdraw. Please see Fig.2. participant activities for lab visits and training at home. For both lab visits, participants will be given aromatic sticks to sniff to evaluate their Threshold, Discrimination and Identification (TDI score) of olfactory functions. Participants will also be given filter-paper discs of four tastes of sweet (sucrose), salty (sodium chloride), sour (citric acid) and bitter (quinine), and two trigeminal of cooling (menthol) and hot/burning (capsaicin) to evaluate their identification capability and threshold of taste and trigeminal sensations. Each session is expected to take up to 2 hours. On their first lab visit, participants will also be given logging-in information (by participant number) to an Xerte webpage so that they can access training protocol and their flavour selection if needed. Subsequently to the two lab visits, participants will be asked to conduct two at-home tests (once before and once after the 12-week training/waiting) to evaluate their smell, taste and trigeminal perception. For both OT and CTR groups, participants will be offered chewing gum training kit on their second lab visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anosmia
  • Parosmia
  • Phantosmia
  • Dysgeusia
  • Ageusia

Keywords

  • Multimodal flavour perception
  • flavour training
  • chewing gum
  • flavour perception recovery
03

In context

Anosmia

180 studies on the registry are indexed under Anosmia; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Anosmia.

Browse Anosmia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nottingham is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Aged between 18 and 65 years male and female

      • Have impairment in smell and/or taste (with a medical diagnosis or self-perception of between 3 months and 2 years)
      • Were able to smell and taste normally prior to the impairment (we anticipate that participants will have experienced the condition following a viral infection or idiopathically, etc)
      • Voluntary participation in the study
      • Willing to travel to Nottingham for 2 lab visits
      • Able to give informed written consent
      • Having not taken part in olfactory training or related research in the last 3 months or any study providing an inconvenience allowance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Physical damage in oral and/or nasal cavity due to surgery, trauma, etc.

      • Active infection with a virus that impedes smell and/or taste perception, sinonasal diseases, Parkinson's disease
      • Chewing or biting difficulty that would restrict chewing gum regularly
      • Allergy to chewing gum ingredients
      • Pregnancy or lactating
      • Having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months involving invasive procedures or an inconvenience allowance (this must remain for ALL UoN FMHS UREC approved studies)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Waiting list control group

    Participants are randomly allocated once baseline data has been collected to a waiting list control group where no action will be taken.

    Other: Waiting list control group

  • Experimental
    Flavour impairment training using chewing gum group (FIT)

    Participants are randomly allocated to chew gum twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.

    Other: Flavour impairment training using chewing gum group (FIT)

  • Active comparator
    Olfactory training group (OT)

    Participants are randomly allocated to smell liquid flavouring twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.

    Other: Olfactory training group (OT)

Interventions

  • OtherFlavour impairment training using chewing gum group (FIT)

    Participants are randomly allocated to chew gum twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.

  • OtherOlfactory training group (OT)

    Participants are randomly allocated to smell liquid flavouring twice a day for 12 weeks whilst at home.

  • OtherWaiting list control group

    Participants are randomly allocated once baseline data has been collected to a waiting list control group where no action will be taken.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Threshold Discrimination and Identification (TDI) score using Sniffin' Sticks.

    Participants will be required to sniff aromatic pens to evaluate their Threshold Discrimination and Identification of aromas at the at start and end of the study.

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identification of taste using four basic taste solutions

    Participants are required to identify whether they can taste four different basic tastes at the start and end of the study.

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

  2. At home smell test

    Participants, whilst blindfolded, will be required to attempt to identify 5 smells commonly found in the home.

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

  3. Training compliance

    Participants will be required to submit weekly completion questionnaires online for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

  4. Reflection on training and feasibility of the study.

    Participants will be required to complete a questionnaire exploring their perceptions of the feasibility of the study.

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

  5. Reflection on severity of abnormality in flavour perception

    Participants will be required to complete a questionnaire recording their perception of the severity of their abnormality in flavour perception

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

  6. Perception of impact on life experience of changes in flavour perception.

    Participants will be required to complete a questionnaire exploring the impact of their flavour perception on their life experience.

    Time frame: From enrolment to study to after 12 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Nottingham
    Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li Z, Stolper S, Draf J, Haehner A, Hummel T. Smell, taste and trigeminal function: similarities and differences between results from home tests and examinations in the clinic. Rhinology. 2022 Aug 1;60(4):293-300. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.430. PubMed 35926120 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All aspects

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: April 2025- indefinitely

Access criteria: Information will be available on request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2024 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 16 months.

Of 50 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anosmia, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 37. This study's 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 50 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 23, 2026
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
StartActual
Oct 21, 2024
Primary completionActual
Mar 19, 2026
CompletionActual
Mar 19, 2026
Last update
Mar 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07498062
Collaborators
TasteTech
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Start date
Oct 21, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 19, 2026
Completion
Mar 19, 2026
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Ni Yang, PhD
principal investigator · University of Nottingham
Rebecca Ford, PhD
principal investigator · University of Nottingham
Moira A Taylor, PhD
principal investigator · University of Nottingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion