ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07488858Updated Mar 23, 2026

Thyroidectomy: Microscopic Versus Conventional

An interventional study of Microscopic Thyroidectomy and Conventional Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Cancer and Thyroid Surgeries, sponsored by Shahida Islam Medical Complex. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-23.

Sponsored by Shahida Islam Medical Complex · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Despite promising findings from international studies, the use of microscopic thyroidectomy remains limited in local surgical practice, where conventional thyroidectomy is traditionally followed. There is a scarcity of local data evaluating the benefits of MT, and inconsistencies in reported outcomes highlight the need for further research. The lack of standardized protocols and limited surgeon experience with microscopic techniques contribute to hesitation in its adoption.

This study aims to address the research gap by providing comparative data on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications in microscopic versus conventional thyroidectomy in our setting. The findings will aid in determining whether MT should be incorporated into routine surgical practice to improve patient outcomes and reduce postoperative complications.

Read the detailed description

Thyroid disorders requiring surgical intervention are common, with conditions such as multi nodular goiter, thyroid malignancies, and hyperthyroidism frequently necessitating thyroidectomy. The procedure, while effective, poses risks due to the intricate anatomy of the thyroid gland and its proximity to critical structures such as the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN), and parathyroid glands. Complications like RLN palsy, hypocalcemia, and hematoma can result in significant morbidity. Hypocalcemia occurs in 20%-30% of cases, while RLN injury is reported in 5%-11%, with bilateral RLN paralysis being a rare but life-threatening complication. Minimizing these risks requires precise surgical techniques, adequate anatomical knowledge, and surgeon expertise. Thyroid surgery has evolved significantly, incorporating various approaches to enhance safety and outcomes. Conventional thyroidectomy (CT) remains the standard procedure, providing direct visualization and effective gland excision. Endoscopic thyroidectomy, utilizing minimal access techniques, has improved cosmetic outcomes but often involves longer operative times. The use of robotic-assisted thyroidectomy has further advanced precision, though cost and availability remain limiting factors. Microscopic thyroidectomy (MT), which involves magnification techniques for enhanced visualization, has been introduced to minimize complications. Studies suggest MT offers superior preservation of RLN, EBSLN, and parathyroid glands, reducing transient nerve palsies and hypocalcemia rates compared to conventional approaches.

However, it is essential to assess its efficacy in routine clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thyroid Cancer
  • Thyroid Surgeries

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • thyroidectomy
  • microscopic
  • laryngeal nerve palsy
03

In context

Thyroid Neoplasms

785 studies on the registry are indexed under Thyroid Neoplasms; 204 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is above the median of 53 across 520 interventional studies indexed under Thyroid Neoplasms.

Browse Thyroid Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Shahida Islam Medical Complex is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both Male or female patients.
  • Patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing thyroidectomy for benign or malignant thyroid disease.
  • Patients with multinodular goiter, Grave's disease, thyroid carcinoma indicated for surgery based on their workup.
  • Candidates scheduled for unilateral lobectomy, subtotal thyroidectomy, or total thyroidectomy.
  • Patients with preoperative normal vocal cord mobility confirmed by laryngoscopy.

Hemodynamically stable patients without significant comorbidities affecting surgery or anesthesia based on (Class I-III).

  • Patients who provide to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of prior thyroid surgery.
  • Patients with evidence of lateral lymph node or local invasion on preoperative imaging (ultrasonography or computed tomography).
  • Patients with pre-existing hypocalcemia or parathyroid disorders.
  • Patients with severe medical comorbidities, including uncontrolled diabetes ( > 8%), chronic kidney disease ( \< 30 mL/min/1.73m²), liver cirrhosis ( class B or C), or coagulopathy ( > 1.5 or count \< 50,000/μL), will be excluded from the study.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with invasive thyroid carcinoma, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, or thyroid lymphoma requiring extensive radical surgery.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Microscopic Thyroidectomy

    Procedure: Microscopic Thyroidectomy

  • Placebo comparator
    Conventional Thyroidectomy

    Procedure: Conventional Thyroidectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicroscopic Thyroidectomy

    The procedure was done under general anesthesia but with an endotracheal intubation. Transverse cervical incision (45 cm) was done along a natural skin line. Magnification (Zeiss Sensera, 3-5x magnification) was employed in order to make the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN), and parathyroid glands easier to dissect. The ligatures were done at the superior pole of the thyroid gland and not at EBSLN. The RN was determined on the entry site to the larynx and kept in perfect condition. The parathyroid glands were distinguished, frozen or remedied in the event of the devascularization. The thyroid gland had been removed according to the intended operation (lobectomy, sub-total, or the total thyroidectomy). The wound was closed in layers and hemodynamics was restored

  • ProcedureConventional Thyroidectomy

    A similar method was employed except that no microscopic magnification was employed. The standard visual techniques were used to identify RN and EBSLN and the process was accomplished according to the traditional approach. The traditional methods were used to identify and preserve parathyroid glands without any further magnification. The recovery room paid close attention to patients following surgery in case of any immediate complications such as bleeding or airway obstruction. Serum calcium levels were tested 24 hours after operation to determine whether they were hypocalcaemic and indirect laryngoscopy carried out prior to discharge to determine the functioning of the vocal cords

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean intraoperative blood loss

    It will be defined as the mean total volume of blood lost during the surgical procedure, measured in milliliters (mL). Blood loss will be estimated using the difference between preoperative and postoperative suction canister volumes, accounting for irrigation fluids, and by weighing surgical sponges and gauze (1 g of blood = 1 mL).

    Time frame: 0 days

  2. Percentage of Transient Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) Palsy

    postoperative unilateral or bilateral impairment of vocal cord mobility due to RLN dysfunction, confirmed by indirect laryngoscopy or videolaryngostroboscopy performed by an otolaryngologist. Diagnosis will be based on reduced or absent vocal cord movement compared to preoperative assessment. Patients exhibiting hoarseness, breathiness, or dysphonia with confirmed vocal cord dysfunction on laryngoscopic evaluation within one month postoperatively will be labeled as transient RLN palsy. Any patient showing full recovery of vocal cord mobility on follow-up laryngoscopy at one month will be classified as transient.

    Time frame: one month

  3. Percentage of Permanent Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) Palsy

    persistent postoperative unilateral or bilateral vocal cord paralysis confirmed by indirect laryngoscopy or videolaryngostroboscopy at one month postoperatively by an otolaryngologist. Diagnosis will require complete absence of vocal cord movement on objective examination at one month, without any signs of recovery. Patients with persistent hoarseness, dysphonia, or aspiration symptoms accompanied by vocal cord immobility at one month will be definitively classified as having permanent RLN palsy.

    Time frame: one month

  4. percentage of Transient Hypocalcemia

    It will be labeled as transient hypocalcemia if the patient experiences symptoms such as perioral numbness, carpopedal spasms, or tetany within one month of surgery, with laboratory confirmation of serum calcium \< 8.0 mg/dL. Diagnosis will be based on serial calcium measurements, and resolution within one month without continued supplementation will confirm its transient nature.

    Time frame: one month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore
    Lahore, Punjab Province 60000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2025 to primary completion in Mar 2026, 2 months.

Of 126 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Thyroid Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 78. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 127 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 78.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2026
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
StartActual
Dec 16, 2025
Primary completionActual
Mar 15, 2026
CompletionActual
Mar 15, 2026
Last update
Mar 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07488858
Lead sponsor
Shahida Islam Medical Complex
Responsible party
Dr Mudassar Saeed Pansota (Associate Professor, Shahida Islam Medical Complex) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Dec 16, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2026
Completion
Mar 15, 2026
Last update
Mar 23, 2026

Study contacts

mudassar saeed pansota
principal investigator · Assistant Professor of Urology, Shahida Islam Teaching Hospital, Lodhran, Pakistan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion