CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07486804Updated Mar 23, 2026

Effects of taVNS Combined With tACS on Adolescents With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury

An interventional study of 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation and sham 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and 10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation in Non-suicidal Self-injury, sponsored by Anhui Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 22 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-23.

Sponsored by Anhui Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Mar 2026).
  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 22 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

NSSI behavior is highly prevalent among adolescents, and its mechanisms are closely associated with attentional bias toward self-injury-related information and impulsivity, both of which may be related to reduced dlPFC activation levels. Introducing taVNS as a priming stimulus to pre-regulate brain state and optimize subsequent tACS treatment response provides a novel approach to addressing inconsistent intervention effects. Simultaneously, this facilitates a shift in the brain from passive stimulus reception to active state regulation, offering important theoretical foundations for developing more precise and efficient cross-modal neuromodulation therapies.This study aims to systematically validate the efficacy of a combined protocol using taVNS as a priming modality followed by tACS over the left dlPFC through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The investigators hypothesize that:

① Compared to tACS intervention alone, this combined approach will not only demonstrate non-inferiority in overall therapeutic efficacy but, more importantly, significantly reduce inter-individual variability in treatment response to tACS. This would mitigate the issue of high clinical response heterogeneity and enhance the stability and predictability of treatment outcomes.

② Early behavioral biomarkers of intervention response are anticipated: Immediate improvements in attentional bias following a single combined intervention session will significantly predict reductions in the frequency and intensity of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) after a full course (14 sessions) of treatment. This suggests that early positive changes in cognitive function could serve as valid indicators predicting long-term clinical efficacy, offering a critical time window for implementing individualized treatment adjustments.

③ The study will elucidate the effects of the taVNS-primed combined tACS treatment on neuroimaging mechanisms in adolescents with NSSI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-suicidal Self-injury

Keywords

  • non-suicidal self-injury
  • transcranial alternating current stimulation
  • taVNS
  • tACS
  • state-dependant
03

In context

Self-Injurious Behavior

249 studies on the registry are indexed under Self-Injurious Behavior; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 66 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Self-Injurious Behavior.

Browse Self-Injurious Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Anhui Medical University is the lead sponsor of 102 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 22 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet the proposed diagnostic criteria for non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), with ≥5 documented self-injury episodes and at least one incident within the past month as assessed by the Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment Questionnaire (ANSAQ)
  • Aged 12-18 years
  • Right-handed
  • Possess formal education experience sufficient to comprehend experimental protocols
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal binocular visual acuity
  • Voluntarily participate with legal guardians providing written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score \< 26
  • History of suicide attempts
  • History of epilepsy, brain surgery, tumors, or clinically significant head trauma
  • History of substance abuse or severe physical diseases
  • Received physical or psychological interventions within the past three months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combined Stimulation Group

    deliver 15 minutes taVNS and 20 minutes of 10hz tACS intervention

    Device: 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

  • Active comparator
    tACS-Only Group

    deliver sham 15 minutes taVNS and 20 minutes of 10hz tACS intervention

    Device: sham 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and 10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

  • Placebo comparator
    taVNS-Only Group

    deliver 15 minutes taVNS and 20 minutes of sham 10hz tACS sham intervention ,but 10 Hz active sham control the current will be ramped up to 2 mA and then ramped down to 0 mA within the first 30 seconds.

    Device: active 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and sham10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

Interventions

  • Device25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

    The active taVNS stimulation was applied to the cymba conchae, an area exclusively innervated by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Active taVNS stimulation protocol was set as follows: pulse width of 300 μs, frequency of 25 Hz, and current intensity adjusted based on each participant's individual threshold, set at 80% of the sensory threshold. The stimulation duration was 15 minutes. Active 10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation: 10 Hz tACS delivered through a 4×1-ring high-definition electrode montage centered on left DLPFC (F3), 2 mA peak-to-peak, 100 % intensity, gradually ramped up over 30 s, maintained for 20 min, then ramped down over 30 s; two sessions per day with at least 4 h between sessions, repeated for 7 consecutive days (14 total sessions).

  • Devicesham 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and 10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

    The sham taVNS stimulation was placed on the earlobe. The two procedures were indistinguishable in terms of appearance, ensuring effective blinding. The stimulation duration was 15 minutes. Active 10HZ transcranial alternating current stimulation: 10 Hz tACS delivered through a 4×1-ring high-definition electrode montage centered on left DLPFC (F3), 2 mA peak-to-peak, 100 % intensity, gradually ramped up over 30 s, maintained for 20 min, then ramped down over 30 s; two sessions per day with at least 4 h between sessions, repeated for 7 consecutive days (14 total sessions).

  • Deviceactive 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and sham10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

    The active taVNS stimulation was applied to the cymba conchae, an area exclusively innervated by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. active taVNS stimulation protocol was set as follows: pulse width of 300 μs, frequency of 25 Hz, and current intensity adjusted based on each participant's individual threshold, set at 80% of the sensory threshold. The stimulation duration was 15 minutes. Sham 10HZ transcranial alternating current stimulation: identical 4×1-ring high-definition electrode montage centered on left DLPFC (F3), 2 mA peak-to-peak current ramped up over 30 s and immediately ramped down to 0 mA, followed by 19.5 min of no stimulation to match the 20-min session duration of active tACS; delivered twice daily (≥4 h apart) for 7 consecutive days (14 total sessions).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adolescent Non-suicidal Self-injury Assessment Questionnaire (ANSAQ) reduction in the frequency of self-injury

    The ANSAQ is a brief, self-report tool specifically designed for adolescents aged 12-18 to quantify non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) over the past year. It is used both to screen for clinically relevant self-harm and to track changes in self-injury frequency after an intervention. Higher frequencies indicate more severe NSSI behavior.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.

  2. Brief Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BBIS)

    The BBIS is an 8-item, self-report subset of the well-known Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Each item (e.g., "I act on the spur of the moment") is answered on a 4-point scale: 1 = rarely/never, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, 4 = almost always/always. Total scores range 8-32; higher scores indicate greater impulsivity. Total score: 32. Higher scores indicate greater impulsivity.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  3. Eye movement index-fixation counts

    A free-viewing paradigm consisting of 60 images was employed, with eye movements recorded using an SMI-RED eye-tracking system. Each trial comprised a four-image array: three neutral stimuli and one NSSI-related stimulus, presented for 4000 ms. A dot-probe paradigm consisting of 204 trials was employed, with eye movements recorded using an SMI-RED eye-tracking system. Each trial comprised a pair of images: one neutral stimulus and one NSSI-related stimulus, presented for either 200 ms or 500 ms.The region of interest (ROI) was defined as the area containing the NSSI-related cue. 'Dwell time' was operationalized as the total duration (in milliseconds) that the eyes remained fixated within the ROI during image presentation. Values were averaged across all NSSI-related cue images at baseline (Day 0) and post-intervention (Day 8). A clinically relevant improvement in inhibitory control was defined as a ≥20% reduction in total dwell time on NSSI-related cues relative to baseline.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  4. Stop Signal Task(SST)

    The experiment consisted of 192 trials (64 × 3), preceded by a 20-trial practice phase. Each trial began with a 1.5-second fixation cross, followed by a left- or right-pointing arrow (maximum duration: 2 seconds), to which participants responded as quickly and accurately as possible. In approximately 25% of trials, an auditory stop signal was presented after a variable delay, requiring participants to inhibit their response. The stop-signal delay (SSD) was dynamically adjusted using a staircase procedure (initial delay: 250 ms; ±50 ms based on performance) to index inhibitory control. The inter-trial interval was fixed at 30 seconds.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  5. Delay Discounting Task (DDT)

    The study employed a Delay Discounting Task (DDT) to assess individuals' preference for immediate versus delayed rewards. The task included 80 trials, generated by fully crossing four delayed reward amounts (¥25, ¥50, ¥100, ¥500), five delay durations (7, 14, 30, 90, and 180 days), and four discount rates (70%, 85%, 90%, and 95%). Each trial began with a 1.5-second fixation cross, followed by a simultaneous presentation of two options: a smaller immediate reward and a larger delayed reward, with their positions randomized across trials. Participants selected their preferred option using the left or right arrow keys, and no feedback was provided.、

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) score

    The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) is a clinician-administered questionnaire widely used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The 17-item version (HAMD-17) is the most commonly used, with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  2. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14) score

    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14) is a clinician-administered scale assessing the severity of anxiety symptoms. It comprises 14 items, with total scores ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  3. the score of PANSI

    14-item self-report that gauges both protective (positive) and risk-related (negative) aspects of suicide ideation in adolescents. Items are rated 1-5; higher totals on the 6-item Positive Ideation sub-scale (range 6-30) indicate greater resilience, while higher totals on the 8-item Negative Ideation sub-scale (range 8-40) signal increased suicide risk.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  4. The score of Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS)

    The Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) is a self-report measure assessing rumination, defined as repetitive and passive thinking about negative emotions and their causes. The 22-item version yields total scores from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating more frequent rumination.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  5. The score of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-16)

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-16) is a 16-item self-report measure assessing emotion dysregulation across multiple dimensions. It assesses five dimensions: non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity.Total scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

  6. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item self-report scale assessing depression severity based on DSM-5 criteria. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Scores ≥10 suggest moderate depression.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.

  7. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item self-report screening tool for anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity. Scores ≥10 indicate moderate anxiety.

    Time frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences
    Hefei, Anhui, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07486804
Lead sponsor
Anhui Medical University
Responsible party
Hongyan Zhu (Graduate Student Researcher, Anhui Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 16, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 23, 2026

Study contacts

Hongyan Zhu
Contact
2445011125@stu.ahmu.edu.cn
+ 86 18155313002
Hongyan Zhu
principal investigator · School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion