ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07486440SALTOUpdated Mar 20, 2026

Shoulder Dislocation: Assessment of Lesions, Trajectories and Outcomes (SALTO)

An observational study in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation, Shoulder Dislocation Closed Traumatic and First Time Shoulder Dislocation, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-20.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Recurrence)No conditionIs this wrong?Recurrence describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
180
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide epidemiological and prognostic data from a defined urban population and to improve understanding of risk factors and long-term outcomes following first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients aged 16 years and older presenting to the Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • What is the incidence of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations in the Oslo region?
  • What is the prevalence and extent of bipolar bone loss and soft tissue injuries measured by CT and MR after a first-time shoulder dislocation?
  • Does bone loss increase the risk of recurrent shoulder instability?
  • How do imaging findings and recurrence influence long-term shoulder function and quality of life?

Participants will:

  • Undergo standard clinical evaluation and conventional radiographs as part of routine care and asked to participate and followed longitudinally
  • Be offered additional CT and MRI imaging to assess glenoid and humeral bone loss and to evaluate soft tissue injuries.
  • Complete electronic questionnaires (WOSI, EQ-5D-5L, pain score, Rowe score, return to sport/work) at 3 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years.
  • Be invited to long-term follow-up, including radiographs at 10 years to evaluate signs of osteoarthritis.
Read the detailed description

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation is a common injury, particularly among young and active individuals. Recurrence after a first-time anterior dislocation is frequent and varies substantially depending on age, activity level, and structural injury. Established risk factors include young age, male sex, hyperlaxity, participation in contact or overhead sports and concomitant bony or soft tissue injury. Despite the high recurrence risk in selected patient groups, most first-time dislocators are treated non-operatively in current Norwegian practice.

Subtle bony defects may be underdiagnosed on plain radiographs. Approximately one-third of patients sustain a bony Bankart lesion, and more than 70% present with a Hill-Sachs lesion. The size and location of the Hill-Sachs lesion, as well as its on-track/off-track classification, have implications for treatment strategy. CT with three-dimensional reconstruction is considered the most reliable method for assessing glenoid and humeral bone loss, while MRI enables detailed evaluation of associated soft tissue injuries, including labral and capsuloligamentous lesions.

The SALTO study is a prospective observational cohort including all eligible patients aged ≥16 years presenting with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation at a defined urban emergency clinic. The study will systematically assess bone loss using CT and characterize soft tissue injuries using MRI. Patients will be followed longitudinally with clinical data and patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate recurrence, shoulder function, and long-term shoulder function.

By correlating imaging findings with recurrent instability and long-term outcomes, the study aims to improve risk stratification after first-time anterior shoulder dislocation and identify patients who may benefit from early surgical intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
  • Shoulder Dislocation Closed Traumatic
  • First Time Shoulder Dislocation
  • Shoulder Instability
  • Hill Sach Lesion
  • Bankart Lesion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • First time shoulder dislocation
  • Shoulder instability
  • Primary shoulder dislocation
  • Recurrence
  • Bone loss
  • traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation
  • prospective
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 834 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All eligible patients presenting with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation at Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic (Oslo University Hospital, OUS) during the inclusion period will be asked to participate.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥16 years
  • Diagnosis of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation
  • Resident in the Oslo region who presents to Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic for treatment or follow-up within two weeks after initial injury
  • Ability to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous shoulder dislocation requiring reduction (Patients uncertain about prior dislocation are excluded)
  • Age \< 16 years
  • Chronic substance abuse affecting compliance
  • Inability to understand Norwegian or English
  • Adult not able to provide consent or severe medical or psychiatric condition precluding follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Traumatic first time anterior shoulder dislocators

    All eligible patients presenting with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation at Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic (Oslo University Hospital, OUS) during the inclusion period will be asked to participate and followed longitudinally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Epidemiology of first time shoulder dislocations in Oslo, Norway

    Incidence of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations in the Oslo region and prevalence of bipolar bone loss and soft tissue injuries assessed by CT and MRI

    Time frame: From enrollment through completion of inclusion, an average of 2 years

  2. Prevalence of bipolar bone loss assessed by CT

    Presence and extent of bipolar bone loss (glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesion) assessed using computed tomography (CT)

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Prevalence of soft tissue injury assessed by MRI

    Presence of soft tissue injuries (e.g., Bankart lesion, ALPSA lesion, HAGL lesion, SLAP lesion, rotator cuff injury) assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of instability after first time shoulder dislocation

    Prevalence of recurrent instability after first time shoulder dislocation, defined as glenohumeral redislocation requiring reduction. To identify clinical, demographic, and imaging-related risk factors, especially bipolar bone loss, for recurrent instability.

    Time frame: From enrollment, data analysis and questionnaire after 3 and 12 months, 2, 5 and 10 years

  2. Patient reported outcomes and shoulder function (WOSI)

    Patient-reported shoulder function measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score. The WOSI score ranges from 0 to 2100, where lower scores indicate better shoulder function and quality of life. Scores may be converted to a percentage scale ranging from 0-100%, where higher scores indicate better shoulder function and quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year and 10 years after first time shoulder dislocation

  3. Glenohumeral osteoarthritis after first time shoulder dislocation

    To evaluate radiographic signs of glenohumeral osteoarthritis at 10-year follow-up and examine their association with recurrence and baseline bone loss

    Time frame: 10 years after first time shoulder dislocation

  4. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Responses from the five dimensions will be converted into an EQ-5D-5L index score using the Norwegian value set. The index score ranges from less than 0 (health states worse than death) to 1 (perfect health), where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months, 1, 2, 5 years and 10 years

  5. Shoulder pain intensity

    Shoulder pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  6. Shoulder function (Rowe Score)

    To measure general shoulder function included pain, stability, range and function using the Rowe Score, ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better shoulder stability and function.

    Time frame: 3 months and 10 years

  7. Return to sport

    Return to sport after first-time shoulder dislocation assessed using a patient questionnaire evaluating whether the participant has returned to sport and at what level compared with pre-injury activity.

    Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2, 5 years and 10 years

  8. EQ-VAS

    EQ-VAS is a self-reported health status measured using the EQ-5D visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 3 months, 1,2,5 and 10 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wasserstein DN, Sheth U, Colbenson K, Henry PD, Chahal J, Dwyer T, Kuhn JE. The True Recurrence Rate and Factors Predicting Recurrent Instability After Nonsurgical Management of Traumatic Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2616-2625. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.039. Epub 2016 Jul 31. PubMed 27487737 ↗
  • Rutgers C, Verweij LPE, Priester-Vink S, van Deurzen DFP, Maas M, van den Bekerom MPJ. Recurrence in traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations increases the prevalence of Hill-Sachs and Bankart lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2130-2140. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06847-7. Epub 2022 Jan 6. PubMed 34988633 ↗
  • Olds M, Ellis R, Donaldson K, Parmar P, Kersten P. Risk factors which predispose first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations to recurrent instability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(14):913-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094342. Epub 2015 Apr 21. PubMed 25900943 ↗
  • Nakagawa S, Iuchi R, Hanai H, Hirose T, Mae T. The Development Process of Bipolar Bone Defects From Primary to Recurrent Instability in Shoulders With Traumatic Anterior Instability. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):695-703. doi: 10.1177/0363546518819471. Epub 2019 Jan 23. PubMed 30673556 ↗
  • Liavaag S, Svenningsen S, Reikeras O, Enger M, Fjalestad T, Pripp AH, Brox JI. The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations in Oslo. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Dec;21(6):e334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01300.x. Epub 2011 Apr 21. PubMed 21507063 ↗
  • Hurley ET, Manjunath AK, Bloom DA, Pauzenberger L, Mullett H, Alaia MJ, Strauss EJ. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Conservative Management for First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020 Sep;36(9):2526-2532. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.046. Epub 2020 May 8. PubMed 32389771 ↗
  • Enger M, Skjaker SA, Nordsletten L, Pripp AH, Melhuus K, Moosmayer S, Brox JI. Sports-related acute shoulder injuries in an urban population. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Aug 12;5(1):e000551. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000551. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31548901 ↗
  • Dickens JF, Slaven SE, Cameron KL, Pickett AM, Posner M, Campbell SE, Owens BD. Prospective Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss After First-time and Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability Events. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1082-1089. doi: 10.1177/0363546519831286. PubMed 30943084 ↗
  • Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS. Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from "engaging/non-engaging" lesion to "on-track/off-track" lesion. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jan;30(1):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.004. PubMed 24384275 ↗
  • Delage Royle A, Balg F, Bouliane MJ, Canet-Silvestri F, Garant-Saine L, Sheps DM, Lapner P, Rouleau DM. Indication for Computed Tomography Scan in Shoulder Instability: Sensitivity and Specificity of Standard Radiographs to Predict Bone Defects After Traumatic Anterior Glenohumeral Instability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 30;5(10):2325967117733660. doi: 10.1177/2325967117733660. eCollection 2017 Oct. PubMed 29119123 ↗
  • Belk JW, Wharton BR, Houck DA, Bravman JT, Kraeutler MJ, Mayer B, Noonan TJ, Seidl AJ, Frank RM, McCarty EC. Shoulder Stabilization Versus Immobilization for First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Level 1 Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2023 May;51(6):1634-1643. doi: 10.1177/03635465211065403. Epub 2022 Feb 11. PubMed 35148222 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data are stored in a secure research database (TSD, University of Oslo) containing sensitive health information. De-identified data may be considered for sharing with other researchers upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the data protection authorities and the study investigators.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07486440
Responsible party
Tea Berge (Principal Investigator, Orthopaedic surgeon, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 20, 2026
Start date
Apr 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2037 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2026

Study contacts

Tea Berge
Contact
teaberge@gmail.com
+47 95751146
Martine Enger
Contact
uxrten@ous-hf.no
+ 47 93035414

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion